06-28-2010, 12:01 AM
Tiff wrote:nemo wrote:Tiff wrote:In what way do you see it as a good thing?
The Toltec knowledge base is a complete, self contained discipline, that has clear goals of understanding and attainment, Why muddy the waters with cross referencing it with eastern and western belief systems.
Its not complete because its not completely examined, such as the talk of darting past the eagle, yet "there is no eagle or eagle's emanations". So its not been fully figured out or explained. Just blind belief in something that contradicts and then settling with the contradiction as if its complete by going back to the thought that there is in fact "something" If not emanations, what is that "something" living creatures cannot grasp? Still stuck with a form of "something". This is explained here as absolutism. The belief in a first cause. If there IS a first cause, then we would be able to locate it.
And no its not the void either. "The void" If it were a thing it would be a permamnent void and could not be anything outside of what it is, and thus it would lack the ability to change from being a void into being anything different if its inherently a void. So even the void cannot be a void.
You can reexamine and change the wording, but it is complete.
The Toltec knowledge base is a complete, self contained discipline, that has clear goals of understanding and attainment, Why muddy the waters with cross referencing it with eastern and western belief systems.
Its not complete because its not completely examined, such as the talk of darting past the eagle, yet "there is no eagle or eagle's emanations". So its not been fully figured out or explained. Just blind belief in something that contradicts and then settling with the contradiction as if its complete by going back to the thought that there is in fact "something" If not emanations, what is that "something" living creatures cannot grasp? Still stuck with a form of "something". This is explained here as absolutism. The belief in a first cause. If there IS a first cause, then we would be able to locate it.
And no its not the void either. "The void" If it were a thing it would be a permamnent void and could not be anything outside of what it is, and thus it would lack the ability to change from being a void into being anything different if its inherently a void. So even the void cannot be a void.
You can reexamine and change the wording, but it is complete.