07-26-2010, 12:06 AM
The Fool wrote:Gonzo said: "I presume that's a qualified "yes"."
It is unique to each individual in its display. In the absolute it is unmodified, unborn, like Padmasambhava explains.So, we have then, unique albeit unconditioned awareness. The key adjective remains unique, imo. If that is the case, then there is individuality; i.e. uniqueness. That is, each unconditioned awareness has specific qualities and aspects that make it uniquely identifiable. And further, it would appear, each awareness possibly has the capacity to recognize other unique awarenesses.
Is that reasonable?
It is unique to each individual in its display. In the absolute it is unmodified, unborn, like Padmasambhava explains.So, we have then, unique albeit unconditioned awareness. The key adjective remains unique, imo. If that is the case, then there is individuality; i.e. uniqueness. That is, each unconditioned awareness has specific qualities and aspects that make it uniquely identifiable. And further, it would appear, each awareness possibly has the capacity to recognize other unique awarenesses.
Is that reasonable?