07-27-2010, 12:07 AM
He proves there can be no essence (no first cause and no beginning of "being"). Tiff speaking of NJ
When I read NJ I see that the emphasis is more on how illogical the reasoning is that claims such things as first cause or inherent essence of things. That is what is so fascinating because people do not see that they are depending on reasoning to make their claims and that such reasoning is illogical by even their own standards and on and on its goes.
When I read NJ I see that the emphasis is more on how illogical the reasoning is that claims such things as first cause or inherent essence of things. That is what is so fascinating because people do not see that they are depending on reasoning to make their claims and that such reasoning is illogical by even their own standards and on and on its goes.