07-29-2010, 12:07 AM
ninth octave wrote:
lex icon wrote:
He proves there can be no essence (no first cause and no beginning of "being"). Tiff speaking of NJ
When I read NJ I see that the emphasis is more on how illogical the reasoning is that claims such things as first cause or inherent essence of things. That is what is so fascinating because people do not see that they are depending on reasoning to make their claims and that such reasoning is illogical by even their own standards and on and on its goes.
Lex,
Could you demonstrate how you came to logically conclude your spiritual knowledge of God was just illogical reasoning on your part. I have been asking you this for years. What really gave you this grand shift in perception in order to cancel God out of the equation totally. In short how did you empty God from all that you thought you knew about God and yourself.Lex,
was the other post before this your way of avoiding answering the direct questions here?
lex icon wrote:
He proves there can be no essence (no first cause and no beginning of "being"). Tiff speaking of NJ
When I read NJ I see that the emphasis is more on how illogical the reasoning is that claims such things as first cause or inherent essence of things. That is what is so fascinating because people do not see that they are depending on reasoning to make their claims and that such reasoning is illogical by even their own standards and on and on its goes.
Lex,
Could you demonstrate how you came to logically conclude your spiritual knowledge of God was just illogical reasoning on your part. I have been asking you this for years. What really gave you this grand shift in perception in order to cancel God out of the equation totally. In short how did you empty God from all that you thought you knew about God and yourself.Lex,
was the other post before this your way of avoiding answering the direct questions here?