Death Roads

[Guest]

The curious thing here is though, that I have quite often witnessed manifestations of an underlying cognitive system ...... before I have even learned or known anything about the terminology of that system. Thus doing it all back to front it seems.
The very first cognitive system being my own Finno-Ugric/Siberian shamanic heritage, which my parents and grandparents, and people in general went all silent about.
It was only some years back, that when I reconnected with that said heritage, I realized just where, what cognitive system the symbolism of my psyche had originated.
The Eagle/Thunderbird playing The Most Sacred and The Most Important Central role within that cognitive system.
Here in Australia, the natives call the underlying cognitive system as "Dreaming" (well ... not really, but that is the closest English translation).
And here the very same experience, what we call The Thunderbird/Eagle .... witnessed, is named as "The Rainbow Serpent".
But the experience of The Eagle or The Rainbow Serpent doesn't really match what you have stated above Lujan ....
Quote:What I saw was the presence of inorganic beings, or shadow beings, outside of a living construct ....
.... though agreeing with you here ... I wouldn't call that T-h-e Eagle either !
... Also; -nor can the "powers" of hallucinatory substances or "dreaming abilities" (themselves) summon The Eagle .... much more is required of the person.
Artnwere

[Guest]

Quote:.. Also; -nor can the "powers" of hallucinatory substances or "dreaming abilities" (themselves) summon The Eagle .... much more is required of the person.
Artnwere
Well if thats the way you see it then so be it
Mmm... genetic heritage ,
Seems you have a great deal to defend. Accessing cellular memory mmm... superb manouver!
I do agree that hallucinogens by themselves are very limited but did you know you can have a journey of dreaming with a hallucinogen when you have not even partaken in the ingestion of that hallucinogen.
And as for dreaming,this living construct is a dream. Everything outside of this living construct that can be organized through the composition and active participation of awareness is a dream.
And also a dream can be created through intending and participating in pursuing an endeavor, which in essence then becomes a reality and if this dream becomes collective then the participating intent will be tenfold, and to break the governance of that intent would be a manouver requiring more skill than enhanced terminologies, don't you think?
Because in essence if something can be composed then in essence that composition has been partaken in.[/b] In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

P.S.
If one approaches the whole question about The Eagle or The Rainbow Serpent for that matter .... purely from "Modern Western Reality Orientation" perspective .... then I am likely to agree with you Lujan, yet again ... there is no Eagle. ( .... in terms of, that if a tree falls down in the forest, and there is nobody to hear it ... ).

[Guest]

Quote.S.
If one approaches the whole question about The Eagle or The Rainbow Serpent for that matter .... purely from "Modern Western Reality Orientation" perspective .... then I am likely to agree with you Lujan, yet again ... there is no Eagle. ( .... in terms of, that if a tree falls down in the forest, and there is nobody to hear it ... ).
Well if thats the way you see it then so be it
So assumptions mmm... my education - have I got one? Did I go to school? And for how long? When did I learn to read? And how well can I spell? Am I dictating this to somebody?
Yes it is true, if no-one hears the tree fall then they can't assume they know something unless they have direct experience in that something or about that something.
If I were to tell you that all my education transpired in dreaming, would you believe me?
Would you believe me if I told you I only learnt to read when I was 21, and still can't spell, and left home and school at the tender age of 12?
Where does that leave me in terms of education?
And how did I eventuate the terms; the cognitive skills, that are a direct reflection of the syntax portrayed? Where did that come from?
Think. Education "Modern Western Reality Orientation" perspective....
There is the tree. I brought you to where it has fallen. And that is what it is all about; elucidation upon that tenuous rope we walk upon called communication.[/b] In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

Quote: A friend of mine said
Anything that represents something can NEVER be the thing it is representing...
There is a limit to how "accurately" you can model something, and if you want to have a "true model" you must have the phenomena in front of you doing what it does.
This comes from the fact that any representation cannot be composed out of the same components as the natural phenomena, or else it would be the natural phenomena it self.
This sheds light on what philosophy seems to be, at least light that enters my eye..
Philosophy is an elongation of conceptual fields, which elongate by liberty of fragmentation into a multidimensional compartmentalization. This fragmentation takes place during any transference of information. Upon transfer the difference between the expressed structure and the receptive structure causes a fragmentation which is the adaptation of the receptive structure by the imparted information within the expressed structure.
Smile
Such a naughty friend too - he has elongated his vocabulary by using my terminologies, but that's okay. In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

Quote:Mmm... genetic heritage ,
Seems you have a great deal to defend. Accessing cellular memory mmm...
Genetic heritage has been something which I have defended for the longest time, yes .... but now I feel that this defending is no longer necessary, not in the same way anyway as before, as I have "recaptured" a lot of the "energy-patterns" dormant in the cellular memory. Now it is more like the time to get on with it.
Quote:I do agree that hallucinogens by themselves are very limited but did you know you can have a journey of dreaming with a hallucinogen when you have not even partaken in the ingestion of that hallucinogen.
Yes, I can imagine such a journey. Good isn't it ! And the picture looks great !
And sometimes I have wondered ... if certain fungi is responsible for the heightened awareness states one enters in some particular places I have known in the forests ?
Quote:
And as for dreaming, this living construct is a dream. Everything outside of this living construct that can be organized through the composition and active participation of awareness is a dream.
And also a dream can be created through intending and participating in pursuing an endeavor, which in essence then becomes a reality and if this dream becomes collective then the participating intent will be tenfold, and to break the governance of that intent would be a manouver requiring more skill than enhanced terminologies, don't you think?
Totally agree.
I see it to be a matter of acquiring enough Inner Silence needed to focus and having enough awareness energy, as in terms of "Free and Independent Will" .... to be able to Intent/Create the Dreaming Reality, one wants to reflect and be a reflection of as some Dreamings are more worth having than others.
Usually we do get so carried away by our own emotional and thought processes, that we do not see our underlying Dreaming Version beneath it all which produces these in the first place & then it is like in that old Zen story:
A man sees his friend on a horse galloping down the road at high speed. He calls out "What are you doing ?" and his friend replies: "I don't know. ask the horse !"
Artnwere

[Guest]

A man sees his friend on a horse galloping down the road at high speed. He calls out "What are you doing ?" and his friend replies: "I don't know. ask the horse !"
I like this it is very funny In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

Quote:There is a limit to how "accurately" you can model something, and if you want to have a "true model" you must have the phenomena in front of you doing what it does.
Agreed.
Though I'd say we live within the "true model".
As Buddhists would say: "The world is an Enlightened set-up already".
Quote:This comes from the fact that any representation cannot be composed out of the same components as the natural phenomena, or else it would be the natural phenomena it self.
Why couldn't we be able to represent natural phenomena ????

I think that most Siberian tribes ... Altaics included revere The Eagle "as the first Shaman" .... as The Eagle initiates a person into The Greater ... Sacred Reality .... (hence the Eagle is also called "Grandfather" (of Siberian shamanic lineages) ....
Sometimes one just needs an "Empowerment" to realize this .... and being initiated by The Eagle into The Greater/Sacred Reality is referred to as "Shamanic Death Experience".
The Grater/Sacred Reality is experiencing directly The True ... Natural Reality beyond the dual mind created illusions/constructs.
www.venajaseura.com/venaj...50x175.jpg

[Guest]

Quote:Artnwere
There is a limit to how "accurately" you can model something, and if you want to have a "true model" you must have the phenomena in front of you doing what it does.
Agreed.


Agenda.

Do you think I am silly I.C.U coming


:

Entrapment How frightening!
Even more frightening when you see this element appearing behind the eyes of those who speak. Encasement; whispering which way to proceed.
But the question is whose voice and what reality proceeds that voice?
Misappropriation in essence is a contributing factor to the construct created.
Whether one is delivered to a cognitive state of enhancement or degradation in essence all elements of syntax are being embezzled by virtue of being here.
The largest contributing factor to our perception is the misappropriation of our awareness in terms of it having the calculative maneuverability to discover in essence that it has been misappropriated.
Ones inner voice can appropriate through assimilation, historical data and also ones inner voice can appropriate through experience and even through that experience be misled by virtue of the construct formed.
A context arising from inner silence may seem to be loud in terms of assimilation that from within challenges the boundaries and emotionality of the conceptual fields that compose the cognitive system of those who witness.
Agenda.

Being threatened absolutely to the core by an inanimate object that did increase to the entire construct that contained me within that experience of shock.
It sits behind everything. For example, like when you are in a dream there is something in that dream that is pursuing you on a level of intent that frightens you.
Nevertheless it is a construct that follows the intent of our eyes that manifest that never-ending universe that is created in correspondence to the entities behind the scenes.
All the available energy of all that focus upon the terminologies put forth, has and will create the manifestations of that terminology, therefore bringing it into being; a description that will only reflect the cognitive system that has been borrowed from one to another.

That is why it is so very important to break fixations upon the terminologies because in essence the terminologies that are not the truth have not come from Juan Matus are slowly becoming the realities which are the wish or the intent of those who want to be beyond who they are and within that wishing they may get what they want, and you know the old saying be careful what you wish for, because in the end that will be the outcome of the intent outlaid, in terms of the compartmentalization, in all its diversity and all forms.
We are in a state of mastery and do not realize this mastery may trap us if we are not careful or has it already?
but remember there are two sides to a coin
At the moment the coin is spinning from one to the other because nobody has worked out what is going on and where CC has added himself and said that it was Juan Matus,

and if you believe that there is an eagle you will manifest that eagle,
Think about it.
But is the eagle in essence a manifestation of inorganic beings through the terminology outlayed through the intent given?
Ones inner voice can appropriate through assimilation, historical data and also ones inner voice can appropriate through experience and even through that experience be misled by virtue of the construct formed.
In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

Multiple conclusions that are fluid within a fluctuating viewpoint that is equal to that which presents itself at the moment that has escaped us. What I was implying is that we are a body of information. Ironic isnt it, when we talk about the human form, it is a body of knowledge that is equal to the containment that is held by each individual?
Imagine if one were to pick up a thimble and within that thimble was water. The thimble represents the containment of water which is an unknown substance yet still to be fully comprehended by humanity. Now take this thimble of water and put it in a ceramic jar; then we have containment within containment.
The larger containment field will say to the lesser: come join me there is more to be known out here.
But the thimble then says, I cant. I cannot comprehend the empty space between my containment field and yours.
And then a jug comes along full of water to give a helping hand and fills the jar with water to help accommodate the traversing of the inner stratosphere of the cup which is the thimbles external stratosphere.
Bear in mind at this point the jar is wondering how did the jug comprehend to pour its water into the empty jar. Thus is the dilemma of identification and comprehending how a concept is arrived at through the idea of containment and transferal of bodies of knowledge into containment fields for comprehension, which in essence will bear its own reflection upon the water poured in.
Bear in mind this analogy is to do with containment only and the structural restrictions caused by containment. The water is really the element to understand.
And the question is: how did the thimble, even though it is so small, contain water in the first place, and why did the jar have more empty space, yet no fluidity? And how did the jug work out it could pour itself into others?


Artnwere - you've changed your post above and I've answered and as you can see I cut and pasted the post you originally put there before you edited it.
My friend you have too much to defend. This shows me clearly where you are. I do not wish to be drawn into this loop anymore because it is obvious you cannot see where I am coming from.
What I have written are personal experiences. I do not need to refer to any buddhist teachings, shamanic traditions. My truths are first hand truths, not second hand and if you think this is arrogant then so be it. But here is where the conversation is going to end.
You'll have to play with somebody else for your entertainment; not me.


To see within dimension is compartmentalization; structures within structures.. This structural anomaly occurs when one is in the living construct. And then when one becomes luminous, one becomes perception itself; intent or will.
This perception can be broken up into luminous compartments outside of the living construct but once this compartmentalization is amalgamated through unification of these compartments, within the living construct, one begins the journey; the traversing of the unknown.
And yes, if one of these compartments is localized within, then this compartment becomes a construct, and if seen from only one perspective, then this perspective becomes linear and then trapped within that localization.
Localization upon intellectual conceptualization is the trap of the ideology . It is linear within nature.
The old sorcerers travelled upon one avenue at a time and in the end when they tried to amalgamate all the avenues, they failed.
To have each separate compartment lit at the same time, one must remember simultaneously upon those avenues or compartments that have been traversed.
Within our luminous form we are compartmentalized within dimension. To be aware of this multilateral facility one must let go of the former ideological structure to become what we are, and in nature this is beyond language; even though this seems to be a contradiction in terms, it just is, when seen. In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

Yes I edited/changed it, because I thought more about it.
But remember, I also already told you earlier that my (personal first hand experiences also) .... came, before I knew any of the terminology or data ... of my own heritage even.
I guess it all really does come to the difference about the personal Dreamings .... as to what we do experience.
Quote:What I have written are personal experiences. I do not need to refer to any Buddhist teachings, shamanic traditions.
Only the thing is, that I did discover my "psychic continuity" as having originated from those shamanic traditions ... and after doing 9 years of a "Buddhist trip" ... something of it did stick also.
But suit yourself.
I seem to have a talent for angering you.

[Guest]

Quote:But suit yourself.
I seem to have a talent for angering you. Very interresting Assumption.
My friend you have too much to defend. This shows where you are.
Think about the word validation, and what you are willing to do personally, to achieve that Validation! [/b] In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

The Three Spheres of Stalking


The first time I met Lujan Matus was a pivotal point in my life, the scope of which I could never have imagined then and probably even now cannot really fathom. We met through a close friend who had known him for many years and who had told me all kinds of fascinating stories about this elusive character. I was intrigued by his accounts, which painted a picture of a truly unique and unpredictable individual who obviously had a lot of personal power and had impacted the life of my friend unlike anyone else. When we went to meet in a cafe in town I was initially struck by the fact that Lujan was not Chinese, for in listening to all the stories I had imagined an older, unconventional Chinese martial artist with a wicked sense of humor. Lujan was very welcoming and friendly and sat opposite me. We didn't have very much to talk about, evidently neither of us being inclined to small talk, but while we were sitting there I sensed that his attention was unlike any I had encountered before. Lujan asked me what I was thinking and I answered that I felt he was acutely aware of everything. I don't remember much else that happened there except that I was impacted by his robust physical presence and noticed that he was simultaneously energetic and self-contained. I was also struck by the generous and uncomplicated affection he had for my friend and how my friend had so much respect for him.
Something about Lujan was very unnerving for me though. His presence stirred up all kinds of strange emotion and made me feel deeply uncomfortable, even though I liked him immediately. We went for a walk and talked a bit more, still not really about anything because there was a slightly awkward feeling that didn't allow an easy flow of energy. I felt revealed and 'unnatural' because I was not accustomed to being seen, I was used to being the one noticing everything and to have it happen to me made me feel very apprehensive. After half an hour or so we said goodbye and by this time, though it had been on the surface an easy and relaxed meeting, I was really feeling stretched and couldn't wait to be out of the spotlight. In the last moments before we parted I looked into Lujan's eyes and felt truly hunted, which made me defensive and hard. He asked me what the look was about and I immediately checked myself and said it was nothing, though I knew that it was something his presence had brought to the surface. He waved goodbye and drove away, leaving me in an absolute emotional turmoil. My good friend and I walked a little way, continuing on to wherever we were going, with me in a stubbornly distant and odd mood. With a mischievous glint in his eye, my friend asked me, What did you think of Lujan? I said I liked Lujan, which was true, but I was stewing over what had arisen within me and wasn't prepared to open up about it because I felt I had no handle on what was going on and I was deeply threatened by how vulnerable that made me feel.
The next thing I knew I was having an emotional meltdown. I stopped and sat at a deserted bus stop, bawling my eyes out and trying to explain to my friend what was going on. I knew straight away that being around Lujan had confronted the deepest compromises of my character. Lujan was the first person I had ever met who lived completely within their integrity. I knew this in an inescapable, cellular, undeniable sense, and it rocked me to my core. His presence was a massive demand on me to live up to myself, and all the years of not doing so, along with all the frustration, self-doubt, denial and heaviness that had engendered, was bursting to the surface in an explosion of loaded emotion. My reaction included everything from anger to self-pity, relief, hope and fear. Even now writing this, the retrieval of this memory is bringing about a cathartic release. When I conveyed this to Lujan he said that this is my inner spirit expressing gratitude, for I'm seeing myself from an elevated position and also being reminded of my purpose, which is the true expression of my spirit. He spoke about this as a recovery that delivers one into a perpetual state of gratitude, in which the world becomes so beautiful because your base plate is stationed in the deep appreciation that you have a chance in this world, which is the clear-hearted humbleness of a warrior.
Immediately after we had this conversation I had a break from writing and went to the supermarket near my house to buy some groceries. At the deli I stood next to an old man with a radiant expression. We looked at each other and I had to say something to him because he looked so beautiful. "You have a nice face." I said, and he answered, "So do you." We then saw each other again at the counter and greeted one another warmly. There wasn't much we could say and no point in making it into anything other than a simple exchange of recognition, but the interaction was really lovely and filled me with gentle elation. I stopped for a coffee on the way back home and some of the other people in the cafe seemed to be lit with beauty and character. I wished I could acknowledge it to them but instead I just admired those qualities silently and hoped they didn't think I was fixated on them in some bizarre way. The next time I spoke to Lujan I told him of my experience and he said this was a definite indication that gratitude had saturated my whole perception and was being reflected in every encounter.
The reason this memory had come to the surface at this time was that Lujan had started to explain the three types of stalking to me and told me that an individual with their personal power intact will cause an upheaval by their mere presence. This took me back to that time in the past when exactly this phenomenon had occurred and which, amazingly, up until that point we had never discussed. When I told him about what transpired after he left that day he began to explain exactly what had taken place in the cafe when he was watching me and I had felt the pressure of his awareness. Lujan said that the eyes of a seer shield the entry of any projections from another by noticing everything that is put forth. When something is seen this disallows permeation by reflecting back that observation, which causes that projection to return to its source and necessitates a process of introspection. He said this is how a seer's personal power strikes someone whose integrity is not in place, bringing about cathartic upheaval that causes them to react, either by reflecting upon themselves or by directing that emotional reaction towards the seer. The shield created by the eyes of the seer comes about through observation without interference. Instead of that projection slipping by unnoticed and establishing a co-dependant lodgment that can be built upon, by being simply observed the cycle of habitual self identification is stopped in its tracks and cannot be perpetuated. Lujan described the catharsis that arises as the loosening of sedentary material associated with the original imprinted sites, which then allows other realizations to be accessed and that pivotal point of reference to transform into something other than it was before.
Lujan explained to me that someone with their personal power intact will be in a position to observe this process as it happens and therefore is able to make a choice at this point to either subdue or enlighten the one whose imprints are activated. He said that this is the fundamental distinction between the two types of stalking applied in the living construct: shadow stalking and light stalking. Shadow stalking is applied to subdue another's power by misdirecting their life force and drawing them away from their purpose. He then said that no-one can take away your personal power but they can direct your attention and draw you into areas that will absorb time and energy in matters that are not in line with your personal growth. Light stalking is applied to align a person with their source of power and enable them to access the tools and energy needed to pursue their personal path in the way that is correct for them. The third type of stalking involves the reordering of ones imprints within a dreaming context to allow freedom from the preoccupations that have been established in the living construct, and this gives the ability to apply multiple angles of cognitive insight in order to extract wisdom and power from those experiences which form the fundamental base plate of ones character. This is dream stalking.
Lujan warned me to be very aware of shadow stalking in the living construct as it is the basis from which the majority of people operate most of the time and presents a grave danger, in that the primary aim is to subdue purpose and waylay awareness in endless avenues of distraction and distortion. Shadow stalking identifies the imprints within ones character and once they are located establishes them as a usable base of operation. Land marked sites can be utilized as a point of reference from which shadow stalking can adapt and manipulate its position in correspondence to what is presented, using the technique of 'bait and switch', which is polymorphic by nature. The expression of shadow stalking in daily life is multifold but essentially will manifest as engagement in something other than the truth of the heart and being drawn away from the tasks that relate to progression along ones true life path. Lujan pointed out that one of the key arenas where shadow stalking manifests is within the application of all forms of dependency. He said that all of us have to be acutely aware that dependency can take an individual off their personal life path, drawing one away from self empowerment and the ability to self-regulate.
Dependency can appear in the form of adopting an ideology and pasting it over a personal inherited imprinted site or underpinning that needs to be brought to the surface and worked on. If a person takes on an ideology that is derived from the wisdom of another then that ideology can become fixed; a usable item that can be placed over ones personal circumstances, but which inhibits ones ability to see what truly should be seen because of the dependency and self identification that has been attached to that wisdom. Lujan said that in essence what this creates is a situation where ideology is adapted as a tool with which to transfix or manipulate circumstances in a state of certainty that only complements the agenda of the shadow stalker. When someone identifies with a wisdom and presents it as a statement of their own subjectivity, though that wisdom may be a jewel within itself, if it is applied within a rigid format this sets forth an arena of denial, because that borrowed wisdom covers the inconsistencies within a persons character. When Lujan brought this up he called it "the jewel of denial" and we laughed uproariously at the images that this concept presented. Lujan explained that the jewel of denial provides a mask to represent the me, which shields one from true introspection and also fosters a tendency to stand within arrogance and spiritually elitist attitudes. He said that true spirituality is not to take a position of superiority but to be contained within ones personal power, which is a direct reflection of ones life experience, and to be within the simplicity of the realizations that come about in the moment that is continually escaping us.
Lujan said that we must be mindful to observe dependency so that it does not transform into a crutch of reliance that brings about justification, which is shadow stalking. Similarly, one must be careful that false certainty does not become a rigid conceptualization that is viewed as bonafide seeing. Independence and self-empowerment come about when one follows ones life path, which gives the ability to see when it is appropriate to act or to withdraw. The only way this can occur, when one takes on another's wisdom, is to embrace the concept of simultaneous enhancement, that corresponds to your life path and does not pull another off theirs. Do not be anything other than yourself.
The distinctions between the characteristics of shadow stalking and light stalking are clear. Shadow stalking redefines another's world in accordance with an agenda, subduing purpose, redirecting energy into preconceived tasks that are not really of the heart but may be right for the one directing them, utilizing that person's attention and taking them off their life path. In the realm of shadow stalking one finds laughter without joy, purpose without fulfillment, repression of character and vitality, disempowerment and loss of direction. Light stalking is to define ones true direction, which enlivens and establishes a genuine base of personal power and proceeds in accordance with the indications presented, putting aside ones personal agenda to knowingly facilitate the growth of oneself and others. Energy is directed into purpose, enabling individuals to pursue their tasks wholeheartedly and find their true calling in life. In the realm of light stalking one feels elated in the knowing that true enhancement is occurring, for one is on their life path and as a consequence abundant energy is available.
Dream stalking is an advanced method that takes place in the dreaming realm and has profound implications in the living construct. This is how Lujan described dream stalking when he first presented the subject to me.
"The most essential lesson I learnt from my wards was dream stalking and the recovery of awareness. The way that a master dream stalker proceeds is to travel into the most heavily imprinted sites that belong to an individual and rearrange the key elements that govern awareness, within a dream context. This occurs by transferring daytime cognition, which is like a multiplex of imprinted awareness, into a dream state where the pivotal elements can be reordered, thus translating that habitual identification into a source of power that becomes more potent than could have ever been previously imagined. Dream stalking can also be seen as a process that can happen consciously, by taking those heavily imprinted sites and reviewing them in a subtle state of observation, or they can be translated into a dream state by your architect of observation or by a dream master, as I have related in 'Fear Not, Be Free' and also in 'Haunted Awareness'.
See The Art of Stalking Parallel Perception, www.parallelperception.com
In 'Fear Not, Be Free, Barak, as an accomplished dream master, took an event from the elemental structure of my being and transformed it into an item of power. This is true dream stalking; true recovery. These landmarked sites can be used to lever your awareness into a new alignment that yields true personal power.
As I have explained, these sites can also be pressured by a person whose internal stratosphere is clear, through their presence alone. When ones personal power bursts upon another's imprints it becomes apparent where those imprinted sites are stationed. Once the individual is alerted, they must review the emotion or upheaval that arises and revert into a state of self-examination instead of attaching the element of drama to the personal power of the one who has triggered the upheaval. This is one way to pinpoint what is occurring within ones conscious awareness, by isolating and identifying that upheaval, which is an imprinted site, so it can be reviewed internally. Many particular events of my life were transferred into the Dream Maker's realm as pivotal points that were shifted, changed and reordered to become a recovery of power. It is vital to identify with power, and not with drama."
Copyright 2005 Lujan Matus and Naomi Jean. In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

Quote:This wonderful response to the above article was written by Samuel.
Hello all, Sam here.
I am very interested in the topics covered in "The Three Spheres of Stalking" article,
I have the following input
In the field of interpersonal relations it is obvious that the light stalking approach is the only path to walk that is favorable to both the stalker and the stalked. If this path is chosen then the stalkers clarity is sharpened and the one-who-has-been-stalked is provided with opportunities to employ self-help to break free from unresolved involvement with conditioned sites. When involvement with the unhealthy sites is broken (through persistent hard work) then the one-who-has-been-stalked becomes self-empowered and is equipped to help more people uncover their own self-truths and thus the cycle of interpersonal healing gains momentum.
It is obvious that the shadow stalking approach leads to all-around confusion and misguided purpose. Not only is the target of the shadow stalking damaged by the ill-intent of the stalker, but the one performing the stalking is actually inflicting self-harm by destabilizing the very foundation of their own personal power through the activation of self-imprinted sites of maliciousness and irresponsibility.
What I am really alluding to is this: one who shadow stalks another is actually establishing erroneous traits within his/her own being and is totally accountable for the manipulative behavior. Through such ill doing the shadow stalker is not only misleading others, but is simultaneously sowing seeds of self-corruption that will have to be bitterly swallowed in the light of the future. Through the action of light stalking / shadow stalking others, we in effect stalk ourselves.
I agree that it is very important that we do not cling to each other in blind dependency due to fear of facing our own personal challenges. It is very important that we communicate and aid each other, but we must ultimately seek truth according to our own innate vision and capacity. Indeed, Don Juan says that, There is very little value in instruction. Sorcerers maintain that shiftin awareness is all that matters. And that movement depends on increased energy and not on instruction. Also, We are geared to expect instruction, teaching, guides, masters. And when we are told that we need no one, we dont believe it. We become nervous, then distrustful, and finally angry and disappointed. If we need help, it is not in methods, but in emphasis. [Castaneda The Power of Silence, chapter 5, pp166-167]. It is definitely a case of self-deception to attempt to own anothers wisdom and to resultantly behold a jewel of denial. Consideration of this theme prompts me to ponder the very important area of responsibility, please let me explain:
If one realizes certain insights within oneself, and then seeks to benefit others by providing lessons pertaining to the realized insights, then the others run the risk of clinging to the second-hand truths that are not realized through direct personal experience. It is therefore very important that the one who has the insights is totally responsible with any distribution of these insights so that others do not misinterpret the information and repress a genuine understanding of their own personal condition because of convenient attachment to the inherited knowledge. The wisdom-bearer may have the best of intentions in extending realizations to others. Indeed the wisdom-bearer may seek to light stalk others by imparting knowledge. However, if this imparting is not performed skillfully then the intended light stalking can transform into unwitting shadow stalking that arises out of an unexpected dependency from the unfortunate bearer of the jewel of denial toward the would-be light stalker. In this case the giving of a gift has turned into the giving of a poison. A personal experience of mine provides an example of the potentiality for such a situation to manifestI once met a very nice man on the train and we struck up a conversation. The mans eyes sparkled and it was clear to me that he had attained certain self-realizations. The man proceeded to tell me about his faith and suggested that we meet so that he could teach me his ways. I was very happy that the man was walking a path that rung true with his being and I was touched by his honest and generous intention to share his insights with me. However I instinctually knew that my calling was different from his and that if I chose to accept his gifts I would be steered away from the path of truth that lies before my own feet. Our meeting was very wholesome and we parted company on friendly terms.
It is clear that we must strive to maintain the highest standards of responsibility on both the giving and receiving ends of all interactions. And we must be aware that good intentions can cause undesirable consequences if not directed appropriately. If we are responsible with our interactions then we co-author the story of a bright future. If we are irresponsible with our interactions then we pull each other down.
Let me now provide a personal story of how Lujan and Naomis acts of stalking themselves has had the healthy spin-off effect of helping me to more effectively stalk myself. My story provides an example of how other peoples personal insights have assisted me to shed light on my own truth, according to my own language.
At an early stage of my reading into The Art of Stalking Parallel Perception I was presented with a confronting internal revelation of my personal situation. I documented this realization and called it, Where I am at. This vision was recorded nearly two months ago and is documented below.

Where I am at
I have surrendered my past to the wind and have shattered many illusions surrounding misconceived identities of self. I now stand in the midst of a personal transformation that empowers me to foster the development and implementation of constructive activities and modes of being. This momentous phase excites and inspires me through the awesome challenges and corresponding opportunities that it brings to my life direction. The movement of the phase also strips away blockages of vision and leaves me feeling somewhat naked and exposed before my present condition, which is this:
My heart is speared by a malleable devise of biological weaponry. This parasitic entity clings desperately to my life energy center and prevents me from living in full contact with the wealth of abundant energy that I know flows from this center. I am therefore left feeling somewhat rigid in movement and detached from my true potential.
An awareness of the existence of this parasite shakes me to the core of my being and demands a large-scale restructuring of my conscious life approach so that I may efficiently dislodge this inhibiting menace from my functionality. This is my most pressing challenge and I am most grateful to have this wonderful opportunity for development and learning.
I have come to the realization that developmental challenges are to be embraced rather than shied away from. Through an acceptance of my challenge I now have strong motivation to direct all of my endeavors to the processes of healing and purification.
As my purpose becomes clarified a compassionate strength wells up from my life energy center and gently counteracts the draining effects of the insidious parasite. In response to the rising of this seeping compassion the parasite struggles to burrow further into the center of my being in a bid to smother it from my perception. But as I persevere with my challenge I see the parasite recoil from the conscious spotlight that now illuminates its existence and I smell its ghastly skin burn under the steady direction of the spotlights gaze. The parasite has long fed unnoticed and has grown fat in its feeding frenzy. It is horrified at having been discovered and is fighting dirtily to defend its destructive existence. But the power of honest heartfelt compassion, merged with the power of conscious spotlight illumination is working harmoniously to expel the parasitic entity. Thus the battle for my heart ensues
Coming into contact with Lujan Matus and Naomi Jean has been catalytic in assisting me to behold this revelation, and to find power within myself to actively deal with the content of the revelation. I sincerely thank you both for extending yourselves into my sphere of existence and for giving me the most precious of gifts. In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

Quote:When the other dreams us is it seeking renewal through the inference of light that is being transformed within the living construct?
And is not the transformation recreating itself through the neurological processes of light that create the dreamer, which in the end finds its source in the dreamed, or the other?
Is this not seeking equilibrium?
And do we not within dimension compartmentalize constructs and from these constructs source information that is either relevant to the fixation or evident upon the truth of that fixation?
So in essence within this compartmentalized state do we draw from those constructs fragments that become our present day cognition that is reinforced through syntax? And if not reinforced through syntax then is that fixation a reflection of the truth that is continually escaping us upon the point that we wish to fixate?
And in the elucidation of those concepts is this also not seeking equilibrium through the construction of fragments that have been accessed from various compartmentalized constructs?
Is this not the way that we traverse the unknown through consolidating these known procedures into an elucidation that moves from the original constructs that in essence are compartmentalized by virtue of being fractured by extraction? And the term associated to this process is evolution; whether it be structurally admissible in terms of verification, or verified through directly knowing through ones seeing.
The amalgamation of the two latter is of essence; essentially true physics. And are not anthropology and physics to be combined to bring about this union?
When one sees and then traverses upon that light that one sees, the light within itself does seek equilibrium in comparison to that, which has sourced its essence. But in actuality that essence within itself is baseless; void like. In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

Oh, nothing wrong in defending some good traditions, which can be very helpful indeed for the journey, as they do provide some practical means and a "map" describing some "check points" about "where one is at" .... along the journey. Though of course (quoting here) "the map" never can be the "territory".
And at some point, when witnessing radiance, luminosity .... "sing" ... direct inner knowing .... Ken Wilbers writings about non-duality came in very handy also.
www.khandro.com/kenwilber/bhe2.html
So if someone was to try to run these teachings down ... I guess, I would try to defend them verbally as well.
Though at times, it is true .... there really is no point in even getting into that subject either .... if the personal experience of the "non-dual luminosity" isn't there.
Quote: Think about the word validation, and what you are willing to do personally, to achieve that validation!
Validation is very important as well, not meaning it in the sense of "ego-validation" .... but validation in the sense of verifying things by testing them out against "The Sanity of Earth".
Ok. I'll stop now.
But I must say .... I have enjoyed the gallop !
Artnwere

[Guest]

Fear Not, Be Free
Excerpt from 'The Art of Stalking Parallel Perception'

www.parallelperception.com
I had gone to bed relaxed, not knowing that on this night I would be pulled into the Dream Maker's realm. I was awoken by a howling wind that penetrated and passed through my neck. As I became more aware of the texture of this auditory phenomenon I realized it was Jagr's roar, awakening me into that mysterious realm where my benefactor and his companions were conspiring to change the fundamental fabric of my cognitive system. I was suddenly standing in the room where the four men had appeared previously and from the darkness leapt Jagr. She flew through the air and pinned me by the chest and as we hurtled backwards, scenes and memories of past events streamed by sequentially. While plummeting towards the floor I realized that the imagery was somehow erupting from behind Jagr's paw, and when we landed she intently locked my eyes with her gaze. There was a determination in this animal, the same determination you would see in a wild cat just before it snapped the neck of it's prey; but her purpose was not to kill me. She was taking me into past events through her fierceness. I heard from behind her a voice, calling:
"Jagr."
Looking past her I saw an enormous man approaching. His head was clean-shaven and when he reached forward I saw that his forearms were like tree-trunks. He clasped my hand and pulled me effortlessly to a standing position.
"Jagr's actions may seem to be harsh and at your expense, but what she has pushed onto you, which is within you, is more than pertinent. The scenes that you were witnessing as you flew backwards in time are imprinted anchors that you must review, with our guidance, so that we can free you from the insidious loop of repetition that is supplied by these sites. Come with me and we shall sit by the void and discuss these issues of pertinence." Walking by my side he did not seem as tall as I'd thought, but the energy that emanated from his being was massive. He introduced himself.
"My name is Barak. I have no fear. My body is powerful and full of courage. Focus on my inner strength and I will guide you through the void so that you can understand how to access this power within your own being."
I focused on his chest and saw that he bore a large black tattoo of a jaguar's paw on his left pectoral muscle. He acknowledged my observation with a nod and continued.
"You have been marked as I have been marked. You have sustained your strength and clarity while Jagr pressed upon your chest. The tattoo that you gaze at is a representation of Jagr's power. I bear that mark out of respect for her. Jagr's fierceness is direct and unrelenting and her lesson is that if you face the world with anything less than purpose, you will be engulfed by that which surrounds you."
I looked into Barak's eyes and the void began to appear in front of me. I knew I was being split.
"Listen as I speak to you," he said to me. "It has been said that there is nothing to fear but fear itself. If fear is our nemesis and that fear is an installation, then the question is: how can we mute fear's existence through understanding?
"Fear is an installed socially stabilized site of preoccupation. The key to resolving fear is to understand the installation and how the installation comes into existence in the first place. If our society were structured in fairness, the trained repetitive roles of inner and outer dominance would not exist. It is through domination that the first window of opportunity is given for a controlling force to install an overview of fear, which suffocates the recipient and opens up avenues of possibilities for controlling factors to be set in place. Through practice, this leads to the development of a hidden network of activity that corrals circumstances and neutralizes the possibility of growth and awareness.
"If you have fear you must be aware of three things. You are born alone, you live isolated, and you die alone. The second and third concepts, if focused on, are relevant for those who have fear in their life. When a child is born it is born without fear but when that very same child travels toward the inevitable conclusion of life, ninety-nine percent of the time there is fear of death. So why do we fear our death at the end when in the beginning there was no possibility of fear? A child is just there. The reason why there is fear is because one has not lived their full potential and within that realization feelings of remorse for not being the way one should have been bring a sense of loss. This sense of loss reforms and recreates itself into rigid arrogance that is sustained through justifications so one never has to face what one should have faced.
"When such an individual is ultimately confronted with the end of their life they do not have the calculative resource to let go of who they are so that they can become something more than what they were. Such people imprint their children with the same mechanisms of denial, to ensure through this replication that they do not have to face that which they have not done. This imprinting is energetic rape and those offspring, within their dysfunctional viewpoint, will perpetuate what they have learnt and further evolve the intellectual conceptualizations that will enable them to entrap their environment within denial. This is the shadow's mind that haunts the very fabric of humanity. The primary reason why humanity guards and protects these sites is that when they are revisited, they cause enormous amounts of regret, and if that regret is a state of realization, then we would have to admit that we have invested in the wrong elements, and for some this is more than devastating. For those in this position the idea of death is as frightening as the catharsis they avoid.
"We are the Architects of our own construct. The trick is to look back on that instead of looking forward and damaging everything in our path. It is best to stop and consider our options intelligently instead of blindly moving forward with the destructive imprint that does not allow the Architect full expression. These things will be explained to you in greater depth when we stalk that element which stalks us. Your task will be to awaken in those you educate the understanding that what they speak and what they do comes from somewhere other than themselves, because it is foreign to that emptiness we should possess as human beings.
"We are born alone and we should not fear to be alone as we live. There is a centralized focal point within all of us. It is invisible to our eye and impossible to touch. We cannot smell, taste nor hear this focal point but we can feel and adjust our perceptions appropriately to outline our inner integrity, through not compromising this inner feeling. That focal point is our inner child. I say to you, Lujan, stand within this premise that I am to give you.
"Give of yourself, except for that which weakens you. Accept what is given, but not that which compromises.
"If this premise is adhered to then the inner child will be free to outline its perimeter of integrity and through this one simple technique the deliberation of one's true self will be arrived at. Upon this arrival one will be confronted with installations of fear that will preoccupy and attempt to inhibit growth: a cloak of sorts. At this crucial junction the cloak installed that inhibits renewal will reveal it's mind and say, "How will my world be if I do not act in a way which is familiar? Will I lose what is dear to me?" Or will the seer within, which is that state of renewal, say, "Will I gain power in my life?" What must be remembered is that if an element of your life cannot survive under the premise just outlined then it was not meant to be there, for in truth it is not what leaves that makes us fear. It is what is activated within ourselves that we truly fear. The idea of loss that we have given to ourselves repetitively makes us cling to what is not right for us. What we have in all circumstances of fear is a self-perpetuating momentum, which can be transferred from an external force, and can be reinforced through internally repeating and fortifying our weaknesses. In both cases the recipient and the perpetrator lose power. We all know within ourselves how far to go, how much to give and how much to take before this part of us is damaged. If we see ourselves as an accumulation of momentive force and progressively activate the architectural element of observation, and learn to listen to the cues given, our feelings will give us arrival at a place of power. As this power accumulates it will become communal and in its sense of community will neutralize isolation.
"We must imagine that something has been pushed upon us and the absorption of what's been pushed upon us is an agreement - even though we don't agree. The fear inside your body tells you it's not right, but one thing fear has, as an advantage is that it closes positive possibilities out of the range of perception. If someone in the position of fear were to touch upon something that would give them a new sense of possibility, you can be sure that the element controlling them will make them confirm to themselves that this possibility is not a viable option. This occurs in society through repetitive loops that reinforce the non-viability of positive change. These loops reinforce within individuals the idea of how weak and powerless they are, and these loops are imprints: inwardly stationed sites.
"Essentially each one of us builds a construct through repetitious acts so that we may confirm to ourselves that the construct itself is intact. This would refer basically to a form of self-reflection that is outside of ones real self, because in essence our inner silence is never really touched or damaged by the construct, the organization. It seems that the construct is so alive, and silence is so non-invasive that its appearance is hard to hook onto, so we simply go to what is familiar and by doing that we forget who we essentially are and instead reinforce the only thing that can be possibly known at that point, which is our trained, repetitive response to circumstances. The reason that we can build such complexity is because of our inner silence, but the complexity itself has stolen us from silence. If we could go back into our introspective self we would certainly re-evaluate what we are doing.
"For fear to exist the cognitive system that surrounds that feeling has to be sustained. We must reform our cognition and give different views to the construct so that we may move away from negative self-perpetuation and reformulate the original construct into a baseless configuration that holds more possibilities, which will be a state of dimensional lateralism. Our imprints are the basis, the territories and boundaries that we are protecting, which by virtue of being protected need to be extensively examined. We can all see that we are defending something but what we need to see is that we can live without these imprints that bring separation and fear. We must learn to dissolve those reference points, those imprints, so that humanity can be brought into a state of resolve, and this resolve comes about from completion. I will now travel with you into a vision that will be composed of past enactments upon you. Break now your fixation from the void."
I suddenly had the feeling of being released. I looked up to my left to observe Barak's face. To my surprise his eyes were bright blue and piercing. He commanded me to focus on his left pupil. Gazing into the darkness that was behind his eye, I saw Jagr leaping at me from the depths. Her roar was deafening and I was transported by that sound back to a time in my childhood. Jagr stood by my side as I viewed a man beating a child. As I watched and the scene became more distinct I realized it was my father. His big hand had the child held by the left arm and in his right hand he was holding a large white sand shoe. I was more than shocked to see this past event reoccurring so vividly in front of me. Standing there watching, I was struck by the fact that this large man kept continually hitting the child and not stopping. What impacted me the most was the sound of the child's distress, and this distress related to the feeling in my own chest. He wanted the beating to stop but it just kept going and going. Jagr began to growl and hiss. I then heard Barak's voice in the distance.
"Put your hand through the scene and stop the man," he said.
I immediately thrust my hand forward into what seemed to be a type of pressure and as I put my hand through that seal, it popped. I placed my hand on my father's shoulder and said:
"Stop."
With this gesture the occupants of that vision turned into shadows and became stationary. I walked around the two people that I had been viewing and realized that which was my memory had disappeared, in terms of the intensity of feeling that had first impacted me upon encountering the original scene. Jagr roared again at that point and we appeared back in the Dream Maker's realm. In front of me was the void. Barak spoke suddenly.
"What you have viewed was a memory from your past. This memory is a portion of your base plate imprint, and as you witnessed that memory, you must have realized the energy that it would take to sustain such a vibrant imprint within you. This living scene that you have remembered is a past event that you have attached too much importance to, not intellectually mind you. It is on an emotional level where you have placed so much emphasis. What you have recalled was obviously a time capsule of reviewal and within this time capsule existed the feeling of fear, and desperation at losing so much control. This imprint, this time capsule that is sustained deep within your being, has resonance. For this resonance to lose its power over you, you must detach emotion from the memory itself. Even though the memory is full of distress and fear, the predominant element that has evolved from that resonance is the need not to be controlled and be made to do what you don't want to do by people in positions of authority. Under certain circumstances this is not a bad thing, but if the original emotion attached to your need not to be controlled is not subdued, you will fight when you shouldn't and be consumed by fear when you should fight."
Barak then instructed me once more to look into his left eye and in doing so I was transported back to that memory. The boy and the man were still stationary shadows and Barak was standing by my side.
"Push your hand through and perforate the scene once more," he said, "and as you push forward, visualize what you would do under these circumstances with your own child."
When my hand touched the shadowed figure that was my father, the mood of the scene changed from violence to tranquility and I heard the little boy explaining what had happened.
"I was with a friend of mine on the outskirts of town," he began. "We went to the middle of a property and there was a house that had been deserted. When we looked inside and saw no furniture, I thought it was going to be condemned and pulled down so I said to my friend "Let's break all the windows", because I'd thought to myself that all these windows will be broken anyway when it is bulldozed down."
My father reached across and touched my hand, obviously very annoyed.
"How can you make such an immature assumption?" he asked with a serious expression. "The neighbors saw you breaking the windows and knew who you were, and knew that you were my son. They consequently rang the owners, who had the damage assessed and now I have a bill and I will have to work hard and earn nothing until this is paid off."
"I am sorry, I didn't realize," the young boy answered sincerely. "I hadn't thought deeply enough about what I was doing. Can I come to work with you on the weekends to help rectify my mistake?"
"Yes," said my father. "Even though I am very annoyed with what you have done, I love you. Please learn to think before you act."
Upon this conclusion I was pulled back from the scene and once again appeared in front of the void with Barak, who began to explain what had taken place.
"Now that you have stalked your past within parallel perception, it is up to you which memory you take to bolster yourself as a man. If you take the first you will be full of resentment and anger and always be fearful of authoritarians. If you take the third circumstance as your preferred memory then you will be understanding and compassionate to those around you who are controlling and authoritarian. You will know that they carry a wound and that it is this self imposed wound that makes them bleed. Take this understanding back with you to the second scene, the visualization of shadows, and I will show you what you must do to release yourself completely."
When he said this Jagr leapt toward me with such ferocity that we were propelled back into that memory that was composed of shadows. Barak was standing to my right and he commanded me once again.
"Break the seal in front of you," he said.
I perforated that seal with my right hand and Barak instructed me to blow air into that vision. I blew, and as my hand touched the shadow's shoulder it dissolved and turned into dust, and was blown away till there was nothing left at all. While we stood in that emptiness Barak spoke once more.
"You now have three choices," he said with finality. "The first choice is to perpetuate your behavior through unconsciously living an emotional proposition that will never find conclusion, because in that first circumstance you were never given understanding as a basis to build your power upon. The third circumstance, which you have visually inserted into the scene after it was turned to shadows, yielded the correct response and course of action that should have been taken. This has been noted by your awareness while within this lateral scene. The second response yields understanding from the first and the third circumstance. When you blow away that which has been you are left with an empty perspective. This empty perspective can draw from either circumstance, positive or negative, and this choice is the only one that will yield true wisdom. Even though the shadows have been blown from the memory the emptiness that exists within that void will take the appropriate mask from the rejected scenes and throw it magically onto your oncoming circumstances, to reveal to you the truth of who approaches.
"Our emptiness is aware of that interconnective fabric that links us through time and space, which seems to be invisible but is tangible, and this fabric is intention. Is this intention truly ours? Have we manufactured this intent that invades every corner of reality and holds us fixed, or is it something else? Take with you only what is necessary, and what is necessary in this reality is what appears after you have blown away what was contained within that scene: nothing. By virtue of this emptiness, inverted continuity will replace that which you used to know."
I understood then how to proceed with all of my memories that had heavily imprinted me. I had to review them, turn them into shadows and blow them from myself so that I may be free from that which holds awareness stationary within superfluous past events. Barak placed his left hand reassuringly on my right shoulder and we reappeared in that room which possessed the void.
"Recovering the items of ones past is in essence all that we can do, and what we do with that recovery will define us as human beings. Be strong and resolve to face this insoluble part of yourself, which is there for a reason."
The dream scene ended as abruptly as it had begun. I woke within my bed and within my chest was left a profound knowing of how to dislodge those heavy imprints that had been implanted within the past.

Give of yourself,
except for that which weakens you.
Accept what is given,
but not that which compromises.
In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

whatisthesecret.tv/reveal...r_wmv.html In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

Recovery and the concept of temporal transmutation and the implications that these conceptual focal points represent.

To recover is to retrieve but in essence what is retrieved is a moment that has escaped the fundamental fabric of our being.
This is what I heard the old nagual say: We are a tapestry of that which has escaped us. For us to advance we must be absorbed within a memory that is ever-present within the solidity of a construct that has been created, yet no longer exists. To advance into the unknown we must traverse all known memories, for behind the veil lays the ever-present existence of the void. To know that empty vastness one must be absorbed within that vastness, and the vastness ushers all that has been into an endless abyss that expands upon that which has existed.
The old nagual and I were immersed in a blackness beyond comprehension. His being swelled to encompass the living presence of my awareness. Within that dome that was his personal power we traversed the unknown, and the old nagual brought this unknown into known comprehension through his capacity to sustain awareness within that incomprehensible vastness where seers tread to discover why existence exists.
For you to know, you must be, and to be is to remember. There is no future. There is no moment. There is only that which has escaped us. To create we travel upon the intent of that which used to be, and upon those morsels we expand upon our intent, inch by inch; recovering. If the advancement is too swift then our being will become swamped in that which we cannot comprehend. Yet that which we cannot comprehend, comprehends that which has been.
When I recovered this memory, not only was I overwhelmed, I was totally shocked at the implications of what had been transmitted. Even though I advance with age, upon every second I am traversing this living construct. I am aging yet when I look at the construct that has passed, only can I comprehend that which has been.
I sit in my present moment yet I know this moment does not exist. And when I visualize my future I know that I am only transporting visual constructs created in the moments that have escaped me within that present that does not exist. Yet I age.
For those beings who travel from the future to the past I know now that the manipulation of their future is only their past, and their transportation back to that moment that is their future is that present moment that has escaped them, yet has advanced upon those who wait for their return.
Yet is not their past our future? Such is that which we struggle with in attempting to comprehend the incomprehensible.
So when I die, I know it is only the past of me that will expand upon that void that looks back upon the luminous fibers that extend to my future as a luminous being, yet that vibratory force, that pulsating template of energetic filaments is known to itself and within that vibratory force time does not exist. Yet it advances and expands upon itself; eternally looking back upon itself to beckon our luminosity to traverse its never-ending thread of light.
Upon these things we must ponder. The present moment exists because it was created and this creation is something that is built upon, through the memory of what has been. So within the conceptual field of this cognitive system we reach back to extend ourselves into new and encompassing worlds that are beyond our comprehension until we become composed of luminosity that extends itself from nothing and reaches into that future that is a past event.

Copyright 2005 Lujan Matus In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

Quote:Haunted Awareness
Excerpt from 'The Art of Stalking Parallel Perception'

www.parallelperception.com
I had fallen asleep early that evening and at about three oclock in the morning was partially awoken by an urgent voice.
Watch out! Theres a man coming.
I opened my eyes in panic but couldnt move my body quick enough and by the time I was in a state of realization to react, it was too late. The man had entered my room and had hit my internal organs. What I saw upon hearing the warning was a grayish whirlwind entering my room, making its way along the foot of my bed. This being had not touched me in a way that you could imagine being touched, but the impact of its presence injured me to such an extent that I was sick for four weeks solid. This event took place about two years after I met my benefactor, the Dream Maker, and I was incapable of dreaming for this period of time. The next opportunity I had to be in the Dream Makers realm was five weeks after the incident.
I woke up suddenly, not in my world, but into the domain of my wards. Opening my eyes I saw Lucien standing in front of me. His expression was calm and clear and when I told him what had occurred he replied matter-of-factly:
The voice that awakened you to the man entering your room was an entity from our realm. That entity is your guardian and has been with you for many years. If you had been struck without being warned your injuries may have been fatal.
There are men who live in your world that dream as you do. The man that struck you was the possessor of ancient information that has been passed down from generation to generation in his family. He had obviously seen the power that you possess and did not want you to succeed in your endeavors. These men are true sorcerers. They were and still are highly intelligent and sophisticated men in comparison to the general populous in their day and in ours, and they had and still have enormous amounts of energy from the secrets they possess. These old sorcerers still are, as they were centuries ago, heavily involved in the dark art of manipulating the psyche of their peers. They discovered through trial and error the fundamental building blocks of that psyche and manipulated it extensively so that they could gain the energy lost from those individuals through a repositioning of the fundamental base plate of their being, which is our primal imprint. They discovered that this fundamental building block, this first imprint, was sustained by pure energy that translated into explosive emotions of passion for life and intelligence. Because of their need to be superior they injected fear and moroseness into the inner landscape of humanity so that they could work on the base plate imprint that supplies integrity individually and collectively. Their prime objective was to break down the inner world that encompasses ones personal power and then manipulate this world with their high level of intelligence and degrade the collective conceptualizations that lie within the truth of the heart, and when that collective power was lost they gained that power.
"And you may ask How could this base plate imprint possibly be broken into?. The way to see this is very simple. Imagine through the avenue of this pictorial analogy that I am to give you that the sensibilities that lie within ones personality are like a mask or a shield. Knowing this is the first step. The second step is to discover and pinpoint areas within these sensibilities that are vulnerable and more available because of the importance attached to the belief systems that uphold the social fabric of that time. The third step that the old sorcerers took to break in to this base plate imprint was to put forth a random precept to discover what may offend that individual. But remember this insertion would be so subtle and so craftily done that the individual would not even be half aware of their reaction. Now this reaction within itself creates a crack in the mask or the protective shield that these individuals have placed in front of themselves. The fourth step that these old sorcerers employed was to peer into that crack, and the way this occurs is that the crack itself creates a looking glass into the weakest link of that individuals integrity. Once they discovered this it was easy for them to dislodge any integral boundary that encompasses that individuals personal power. Unfortunately these were the preliminary steps of the art of stalking.
"This dark method of stalking was passed from generation to generation orally and somewhere within this history they struck an agreement with the shadows and this agreement has been ongoing for millennia. What initially attracted the shadow entities to these men was their cold, calculating unemotional state, which in actual fact ended up being diametrically opposite to what they are attracted to now. In the beginning these beings were searching for a form of alignment that would allow them to cross the boundaries of perception so that they may go beyond what they were. But unfortunately the old sorcerers, as you know, had no control over their need for power and ended up abusing this relationship and tainting those entities with their corrupt intentions."
In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

Quote:Observation without interference

The principle of observation without interference has become for me one of the most valuable and interesting concepts to be outlined in 'The Art of Stalking Parallel Perception' by Lujan Matus www.parallelperception.com There is so much in this simple precept that it is hard to know where to begin discussing what it has brought about for me in terms of understanding. What I find most fascinating is the connection between our subjective perception and the influence that has on 'reality'. More and more it appears to me that the way we see the world and all its components, especially ourselves and the people we come into contact with, either in our immediate experience or through the media, is something we have to learn to take responsibility for on a moment to moment basis. The reason it is so important is that with our every perception we are creating and influencing the multidimensional dream that is our world. The difference between noticing something or seeing it for what is at that moment and the act of holding it fixed within a perception that has become a judgment or a certainty is a crucial distinction that must be consciously made.

When we observe something, whether we assess in depth or make a flash observation, which can be quite 'complete' even in the briefest of moments, we contribute our perception to the reality of what we are observing and influence it in the direction of our particular way of seeing. There are so many ways that I can understand this to be a truth. In terms of interpersonal interactions I can experience it within myself when I'm with different people. Training in martial arts is a good example. As a beginner, when I trained with more experienced students I would notice marked changes in my ability to learn and physically perform with different people. Obviously there are elements of compatibility and friendship involved but this was something different. When an older student who was encouraging and patient was my partner, I could respond to their higher ability with fluidity and ease, 'upping my game' just by playing with someone more experienced. When the older student was disdainful of having to train with someone of lesser ability, my co-ordination (which is usually very good) would go out the window, my focus would be scattered and my movements became clumsy. This may seem simplistic and you could say that all sorts of factors are involved, but it is an immediate and tangible experience of the way we affect and are affected by one another. If I have a limiting view of myself it will restrict what I am able to achieve and my ability to grow. If I hold a limiting view of another, it will hinder their ability to express their potential because their environment, communicating on a cellular level and in the realm of feeling, holds them in a place of limitation. It may not even be an actual judgment or idea of what they are capable of - it might be an emotion that is generated through a personal imbalance or preoccupation, and that feeling harbored will translate into an energetic emanation that warps the energy field of the situation or person attention is directed towards. One can't afford to be careless or unconscious with this kind of influence.

There is so much to notice about the ways people perceive, affirm and contribute to the world. It is deeply disturbing to hear people frequently making statements that include words along the lines of "that's just the way it is", when mostly it is an assertion of how bad, difficult, unfair, boring, mundane and cruel 'life' is. Nearly always a statement along these lines is asking for an agreement from the surroundings and there is a strong expectation that this will be provided. This is a kind of deep seated insanity verging on criminal if you take into consideration the ripple effects such an attitude of morbid, limiting certainty has on 'life', through the gravity of this collective perception of what 'life' is! It is evident that the world is full of tragedy and unfairness and wrongdoing that would be futile to deny, but part of our responsibility as co-creators is to expand our awareness, refuse to agree on the suffocating limitations that are given to us by our environment as 'the way things are' and not participate in continually affirming a negative state of awareness that incapacitates our ability to see beyond where we are now!

Observation without interference relates to allowing things to be in a true state of atomic flux, not holding them in rigidity or stasis with an inflexible point of view loaded with mental dogma and emotional energy that is linked to a personal agenda, which may or may not be recognized by the person who carries it. Undertaking to practice this principle is a moment by moment decision. We catch ourselves in the act of recognizing the qualities of our own perceptions, absorbing what we need to become aware of and releasing those perceptions to allow new input to arrive into an unprejudiced arena, that we may see things from another perspective and become more complete within an evolving understanding - not to mention freeing up what we observe to allow it to naturally become other than what it was a moment ago! To close off from that possibility by adopting an attitude of judgment or certainty is to curtail the processes of learning and expansion and transformation. Through the practice of observation without interference a new self awareness arises as we begin to know who we are as a perceiver, and therefore creator, of our world - not as our identification with habits, social circumstances, physicality or repetitive self-reflection. This understanding hits home as both a grave responsibility and a truly liberating realization that gives the ability to recognize the power we have to change simply the world through our perception of reality!

The scope of what comes about as a result of the heartfelt and ongoing intention to engage our awareness without interference with what we observe cannot be underestimated. Obviously total objectivity is near impossible to achieve in a true sense - we are all subject to our own subjectivity and to take a position of self identification as "the observer" is still a stance that by its nature pressures the environment with a demand to conform with that self reflection. This arena of discussion is a potential minefield of intellectual meanderings and arguments, which may be interesting in a scientific sense but ultimately draw us away from the point of taking responsibility for the roles we play in shaping the nature of our world and the quality of our interactions. Our task is to release ourselves and our environment to allow expression of the moment to unfold without the burden of preconceptions, expectation, judgment and self perpetuation weighing heavy upon that fine balance of potentiality that presents itself to us at all times. We can open a portal into our own liberation by letting go of our fixations as we become aware of them and what will be revealed is infinitely more than anything that can be referenced via the previous experiences through which we are so accustomed to defining ourselves and our world.

To approach our responsibility with this awareness has immeasurable depth and multidimensional ramifications which can be experienced by anyone who makes a choice to proceed in this manner. I urge anyone who is interested in these concepts to delve into The Art of Stalking Parallel Perception, which has been an invaluable tool for me. I have been under Lujan Matus' guiding influence for approximately five years and the process of integrating his teachings stands out as the most intensive and fruitful learning curve of my life. This hardcore apprenticeship is the ultimate challenge as I've been purposefully coaxed away from the shackles of fixed awareness and a frightening attachment to limiting imprints that were previously a signature of my character, and into a field of real time that disallows the re-emergence of the previous stagnancy and limitation. It is a true pleasure and continuous source of amazement to be discovering the extent of resonance and consistency that is revealed as I go deeper into the teachings outlined in The Art of Stalking Parallel Perception and begin to explore them independently on my journey, which is intrinsically linked to a communal awareness that surrounds Lujan and is now expanding exponentially to include all those who long for the deeper resonance of the heart to become the pervasive force in their lives.

We welcome your presence on the website, where we have an active forum that is open to questions, contributions, dreams and insights from the community.

Copyright 2005 Naomi Jean
In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

Quote:
Interweaving elements of entrapment that appear as one thing yet are seen as another. How frightening!
Even more frightening when you see this element appearing behind the eyes of those who speak. Encasement; whispering which way to proceed.
But the question is whose voice and what reality proceeds that voice?
Misappropriation in essence is a contributing factor to the construct created. Whether one is delivered to a cognitive state of enhancement or degradation in essence all elements of syntax are being embezzled by virtue of being here.
The largest contributing factor to our perception is the misappropriation of our awareness in terms of it having the calculative maneuverability to discover in essence that it has been misappropriated.
Ones inner voice can appropriate through assimilation, historical data and also ones inner voice can appropriate through experience and even through that experience be misled by virtue of the construct formed.
The voice of interpretation will deliver and interpretation in comparison to the one who possesses it. A voice in essence is but a voice but it is the interpretation of that voice that is the central issue.
A context arising from inner silence may seem to be loud in terms of assimilation that from within challenges the boundaries and emotionality of the conceptual fields that compose the cognitive system of those who witness.
Warmest regards,
Lujan Matus.In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?

[Guest]

False Mask

[Guest]