Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
hot for your stockings?
#1
In this thread a place for discussing/analysis of pertinent claims (and allure of Castaneda teachings in this regard).
Thats especially the death.. aka to vanish without corpse/cremation

lets start with Spontaneous human combustion
http://www.viceland.com/int/v18n2/htdoc ... er-705.php
http://spontaneous-human-combustion.generalanswers.org/
Reply
#2
Scout1 - why do you care what anyone may or may not believe?    What are you to gain from your "proof" that this is all bull ****?    I am not sure I understand your intent.    I personally do not need to be saved by anyone.....Jesus, Carlos, or you.
Reply
#3
Perhaps the "fire from within" was a metaphor? Perhaps like burning with desire, or burning with passion, or hot for your stockings?
Reply
#4
Scout:
I can't decide if you're just being facetious, trying to waste everyone's time, or if you actually think you are funny, or if you really believe the nonsense you write.  No matter.  If you think for a moment that burning with the fire from within has anything to do with spontaneous human combustion, you are not only mistaken, but so far off in left field it is doubtful you will ever find you way back to centerpoint. 
To burn with the fire from within is to leave this earth in the manner of a sorcerer.  It involves moving the assemblage point beyond the organic and inorganic realms and into the totality of oneself - in an instant.  The effect is so profound that it may or may not leave behind a physical body, and that physical body may be living or dead if it does remain.  If a physical body DOES remain, and remains alive, it is no longer the same person and probably won't even have the memories of the essence that has just departed. 
I've concluded (for now) that you really don't understand the teachings of Castaneda, which may explain why you are constantly railing against them, yet at the same time, returning to them.
Reply
#5
That exloded-burned body is not "warrior", i.e. the third attention mythis maneuver from CC canon is something else, its a shift, e.g. its possible to vanish physically from this Earth by a mojor shift and then there is not a trace of your body anywhere, so the fire from within there is no corpse at all.
Why i write this.. this fire from within death (without burned meath) is documented in pali canon i.e. buddhist canon some monks living in historic Buddhas time achieved this, also accounts in tantric buddhist and tibetan buddhist domain, specifically the Rainbow body, so ultimatetely in this respect
IT IS NOT IMPOSSIBLE :-)))
---
EDIT: QS posted it in sync with me, seconds before me. NO QS, i understand it very well, and i ask You all here to spare personal personal comments on my personal, i am a neutral agent in hermeneutical experiment... (joke). but understand it please.. You should write like me, like a scientist only to the subject to push it more forward... mkay. 
allright..
Gonzo does not understand it !!!! Tell him QS !!!! Lets everybody tell it to Gonzo !!!!! DD i.e. not me !!! )))
You must have a ban by Dreamways Gonzo ) You are trolling like that on everything... but funny. although sometimes pretty pissing up !!
Reply
#6
My little brother from another mother, you plead with us to treat you as a colleague...a fellow scientist.  You gonna hafta suck it up, bro.  Scientist levy the most scrutinizing criticism of one another right out in public forum...to "test the metal" so to speak of their science.  Your making alot of statements laced with the word "fact" in them, of late, capice?  Well then, you're just going to have to endure a little back-and-forth banter, mon ami....a little taking of what yer dishing, savvy?
Reply
#7
All right ))

Here they go!
Reply
#8
LOL
Reply
#9
that is a wonderful photograph
Reply
#10
When entering third attention you may have to pull yourself together LOL
Reply
#11
scout1 wrote:In this thread a place for discussing/analysis of pertinent claims (and allure of Castaneda teachings in this regard).
Thats especially the death.. aka to vanish without corpse/cremation

lets start with Spontaneous human combustion
http://www.viceland.com/int/v18n2/htdoc ... er-705.php
http://spontaneous-human-combustion.generalanswers.org/
Reply
#12
scout1 wrote:

---
EDIT: QS posted it in sync with me, seconds before me. NO QS, i understand it very well, and i ask You all here to spare personal personal comments on my personal, i am a neutral agent in hermeneutical experiment... (joke). but understand it please.. You should write like me, like a scientist only to the subject to push it more forward... mkay. 

allright..
Gonzo does not understand it !!!! Tell him QS !!!! Lets everybody tell it to Gonzo !!!!! DD i.e. not me !!! )))
You must have a ban by Dreamways Gonzo ) You are trolling like that on everything... but funny. although sometimes pretty pissing up !!
You can't really expect to post the kind of "stuff" you do and have all of us "spare personal personal comments", since you are HARDLY a "neutral agent". You do not write like a scientist. You write like a fanatic. Sorry - I intend no offense, but most of your commentary is little more than stabbing at Carlos or posting links. I see nothing "scientific" in your approach.
Reply
#13
scout1 wrote:You should write like me, like a scientist only to the subject to push it more forward... mkay. 
allright..
Gonzo does not understand it !!!! Tell him QS !!!! Lets everybody tell it to Gonzo !!!!! DD i.e. not me !!! )))
You must have a ban by Dreamways Gonzo ) You are trolling like that on everything... but funny. although sometimes pretty pissing up !!
That's a rather interesting sequence.
Reply
#14
Gonzo wrote:
scout1 wrote:
You should write like me, like a scientist only to the subject to push it more forward... mkay. 
allright..
Gonzo does not understand it !!!! Tell him QS !!!! Lets everybody tell it to Gonzo !!!!! DD i.e. not me !!! )))
You must have a ban by Dreamways Gonzo ) You are trolling like that on everything... but funny. although sometimes pretty pissing up !!
That's a rather interesting sequence.

Like I said... hardly scientific.
Reply
#15
scout1 wrote:---
EDIT: QS posted it in sync with me, seconds before me. NO QS, i understand it very well, and i ask You all here to spare personal personal comments on my personal, i am a neutral agent in hermeneutical experiment... (joke). but understand it please.. You should write like me, like a scientist only to the subject to push it more forward... mkay. 
allright..
Gonzo does not understand it !!!! Tell him QS !!!! Lets everybody tell it to Gonzo !!!!! DD i.e. not me !!! )))
You must have a ban by Dreamways Gonzo ) You are trolling like that on everything... but funny. although sometimes pretty pissing up !!
Ah Scout1, you crack me up!
Reply
#16
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)