Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Art of Stalking by Carlos Castaneda
#1
~The art of stalking was introduced to me as a set of procedures and attitudes that enabled one to get the best out of any conceivable situation. 
The stalkers are the ones who take the brunt of the daily world. They are the business managers, the ones who deal with people. Everything that has to do with the world of ordinary affairs goes through them. The stalkers are the practitioners of controlled folly, just as the dreamers are the practitioners of dreaming. In other words, controlled folly is the basis for stalking, as dreams are the basis for dreaming. Don Juan said that, generally speaking, a warrior's greatest accomplishment in the second attention is dreaming, and in the first attention his greatest accomplishment is stalking. 
Don Juan said that his benefactor had taken extra time and care with him and his warriors in everything that pertained to their mastering the art of stalking. He used complex ploys to create an appropriate context for a counterpoint between the dictums of the rule and the behavior of the warriors in the daily world as they interacted with people. He believed that that was the way to convince them that, in the absence of self-importance, a warrior's only way of dealing with the social milieu is in terms of controlled folly. 
Don Juan said that the force with which his benefactor carried out his designs originated from his knowledge that the Eagle is real and final, and that what people do is utter folly. The two together gave rise to controlled folly, which don Juan's benefactor described as the only bridge between the folly of people and the finality of the Eagle's dictums. 
I asked her how she expected me to address her.  "Just Florinda will do," she said.  "Insofar as to who I am, I can tell you right off that I am a woman warrior who knows the secrets of stalking. And insofar as that I am supposed to do for you, I can tell you that I am going to teach you the first seven principles of stalking, the first three principles of the rule for stalkers, and the first three maneuvers of stalking." 
"The first principle of the art of stalking is that warriors choose their battleground," she said.  "A warrior never goes into battle without knowing what the surroundings are”. 
"To discard everything that is unnecessary is the second principle of the art of stalking”. 
Florinda said that Celestino's anger had also permitted the curer to point out, not to her reason, but to her body, the first three precepts of the rule for stalkers. Although her mind was focused entirely on herself, since nothing else existed for her outside her physical pain and the anguish of losing her beauty, still her body had acknowledged what had happened, and needed later on only a reminder in order to put everything in place. 
"Warriors don't have the world to cushion them, so they must have the rule," she went on.  "Yet the rule of stalkers applies to everyone. 
"Celestino's arrogance was his undoing and the beginning of my instruction and liberation. His self-importance, which was also mine, forced us both to believe that we were above practically everybody. The curer brought us down to what we really are - nothing. 
"The first precept of the rule is that everything that surrounds us is an unfathomable mystery. 
"The second precept of the rule is that we must try to unravel these mysteries, but without ever hoping to accomplish this. 
"The third, that a warrior, aware of the unfathomable mystery that surrounds him and aware of his duty to try to unravel it, takes his rightful place among mysteries and regards himself as one. 
Consequently, for a warrior there is no end to the mystery of being, whether being means being a pebble, or an ant, or oneself. That is a warrior's humbleness. One is equal to everything." 
"Don't complicate things," she said in a tone of command. "Aim at being simple. Apply all the concentration you have to decide whether or not to enter into battle, for any battle is a battle for one's life. 
This is the third principle of the art of stalking; A warrior must be willing and ready to make his last stand here and now. But not in a helter-skelter way." 
Without knowing I had used the third principle of the art of stalking. I had put my life, or what was left of it, on the line. I was willing and ready to die. It wasn't such a great decision for me, I was dying anyway. It is a fact that when one is half dead, as in my case, not with great pain but with great discomfort, the tendency is to get so lazy and weak that no effort is possible. 
"Good," Florinda said. "I see that you're applying the fourth principle of the art of stalking. 
Relax, abandon yourself, fear nothing. Only then will the powers that guide us open the road and aid us. Only then." 
"You've correctly applied the fifth principle of the art of stalking" she said. "Don't let yourself wander away." 
"What is the fifth principle?" I asked. 
"When faced with odds that cannot be dealt with, warriors retreat for a moment," she said.  "They let their minds meander. They occupy their time with something else. Anything would do. 
"You've done just that. But now that you've accomplished it, you must apply the sixth principle: Warriors compress time; even an instant counts. In a battle for your life, a second is an eternity; an eternity that may decide the outcome. Warriors aim at succeeding, therefore they compress time. Warriors don't waste an instant." 
She explained that a recapitulation is the forte of stalkers as the dreaming body is the forte of dreamers. It consisted of recollecting one's life down to the most insignificant detail. Thus her benefactor had given her that crate as a tool and a symbol. It was a tool that would permit her to learn concentration, for she would have to sit in there for years, until all of her life had passed in front of her eyes. And it was a symbol of the narrow boundaries of our person. Her benefactor told her that whenever she had finished her recapitulation, she would break the crate to symbolize that she no longer abided by the limitations of her person. 
She said that stalkers use crates or earth coffins in order to seal themselves in while they are reliving, more than merely recollecting, every moment of their lives. The reason why stalkers must recapitulate their lives in such a thorough manner is that the Eagle's gift to man includes its willingness to accept a surrogate instead of genuine awareness, if such a surrogate be a perfect replica. Florinda explained that since awareness is the Eagle's food, the Eagle can be satisfied with a perfect recapitulation in place of consciousness. 
Florinda gave me then the fundamentals of recapitulating. She said that the first stage is a brief recounting of all the incidents in our lives that in an obvious manner stand out for examination. 
The second stage is a more detailed recollection, which starts systematically at a point that could be the moment prior to the stalker sitting in the crate, and theoretically could extend to the moment of birth. 
She assured me that a perfect recapitulation could change a warrior as much, if not more, than the total control of the dreaming body. In this respect, dreaming and stalking led to the same end, the entering into the third attention. It was important for a warrior, however, to know and practice both. She said that for women it took different configurations in the luminous body to master one or the other. Men, on the other hand, could do both with a degree of ease, yet they could never get to the level of proficiency that the women attained in each art. 
Florinda explained that the key element in recapitulating was breathing. Breath for her was magical, because it was a life-giving function. She said that recollecting was easy if one could reduce the area of stimulation around the body. This was the reason for the crate; then breathing would foster deeper and deeper memories. Theoretically, stalkers have to remember every feeling that they have had in their lives, and this process begins with a breath. She warned me that the things she was teaching me were only preliminaries, that at a later time, in a different setting she would teach me the intricacies. 
Florinda said that her benefactor directed her to write down a list of the events to be relived. 
He told her that the procedure starts with an initial breath. Stalkers begin with their chin on the right shoulder and slowly inhale as they move their head over a hundred and eighty degree arc. 
The breath terminates on the left shoulder. Once the inhalation ends, the head goes back to a relaxed position. They exhale looking straight ahead. The stalker then takes the event at the top of the list and remains with it until all the feelings expended in it have been recounted. As stalkers remember the feelings they invested in whatever it is that they are remembering, they inhale slowly, moving their heads from the right shoulder to the left. The function of this breathing is to restore energy. Florinda claimed that the luminous body is constantly creating cob-weblike filaments, which are projected out of the luminous mass, propelled by emotions of any sort. Therefore, every situation of interaction, or every situation where feelings are involved, is potentially draining to the luminous body. By breathing from right to left while remembering a feeling, stalkers, through the magic of breathing, pick up the filaments they left behind. The next immediate breath is from left to right and it is an exhalation. With it stalkers eject filaments left in them by other luminous bodies involved in the event being recollected. 
She stated that these were the mandatory preliminaries of stalking, which all the members of her party went through as an introduction to the more demanding exercises of the art. Unless stalkers have gone through the preliminaries in order to retrieve the filaments they have left in the world, and particularly in order to reject those that others have left in them, there is no possibility of handling controlled folly, because those foreign filaments are the basis of one's limitless capacity for self-importance. 
In order to practice controlled folly, since it is not a way to fool or chastise people or feel superior to them, one has to be capable of laughing at oneself. Florinda said that one of the results of a detailed recapitulation is genuine laughter upon coming face to face with the boring repetition of one's self-esteem, which is at the core of all human interaction. 
Florinda emphasized that the rule defined stalking and dreaming as arts; therefore they are something that one performs. She said that the life-giving nature of breath is what also gives it its cleansing capacity. It is this capacity that makes a recapitulation into a practical matter. 
Florinda said that her benefactor considered the three basic techniques of stalking - the crate, the list of events to be recapitulated, and the stalker's breath - to be about the most important tasks a warrior can fulfill. Her benefactor thought that a profound recapitulation is the most expedient means to lose the human form. Thus it is easier for stalkers, after recapitulating their lives, to make use of all the not-doings of the self, such as erasing personal history, losing self importance, breaking routines and so forth. 
Florinda said that her benefactor gave all of them the example of what he meant, first by acting out his premises, and then by giving them the warrior's rationales for his actions. 
In her own case, he, being a master of the art of stalking, acted out the ploy of her disease and cure which not only was congruous with the warrior's way, but was a masterful introduction to the seven basic principles of the art of stalking. He first drew Florinda to his own battleground where she was at his mercy; he forced her to discard what was not essential; he taught her to put her life on the line with a decision; he taught her how to relax; in order to help her regroup her resources, he made her enter into a new arid different mood of optimism and self-confidence; he taught her to compress time; and finally he showed her that a stalker never pushes himself to the front. 
Florinda was most impressed by the last principle. To her it summarized everything she wanted to tell me in her last-minute instructions. 
"My benefactor was the chief," Florinda said. "And yet, looking at him, no one would've ever believed it. He always had one of his female warriors as a front, while he freely mingled with the patients, pretending to be one of them, or he posed as an old fool who was constantly sweeping dry leaves with a handmade broom." 
Florinda explained that in order to apply the seventh principle of the art of stalking, one has to apply the other six. Thus her benefactor was always looking on from behind the scenes. Thanks to that he was capable of avoiding or parrying conflicts. If there was strife, it was never directed toward him, but towards his front, the female warrior. 
"I hope that you have realized by now," she went on, "that only a master stalker can be a master of controlled folly. Controlled folly doesn't mean to con people. It means, as my benefactor explained it, that warriors apply the seven basic principles of the art of stalking to whatever they do, from the most trivial acts to life and death situations. 
"Applying these principles brings about three results. The first is that stalkers learn never to take themselves seriously; they learn to laugh at themselves. If they're not afraid of being a fool, they can fool anyone. The second is that stalkers learn to have endless patience. Stalkers are never in a hurry; they never fret. And the third is that stalkers learn to have an endless capacity to improvise." 
She explained that stalkers are inherently different than dreamers in the way they use the world around them, and that what dona Soledad was doing was trying to help me to turn my head. 
When don Juan had described the concept of turning a warrior's head to face a new direction, I had understood it as a metaphor that depicted a change in attitude. Florinda said that that description was true, but it was no metaphor. It was true that stalkers turn their heads; however, they do not turn them to face a new direction, but to face time in a different way. 
Stalkers face the oncoming time. Normally we face time as it recedes from us. Only stalkers can change that and face time as it advances on them. 
He said that the most effective strategy was worked out by the seers of the Conquest, the unquestionable masters of stalking. It consists of six elements that interplay with one another. 
Five of them are called the attributes of warriorship: control, discipline, forbearance, timing, and will. They pertain to the world of the warrior who is fighting to lose self-importance. The sixth element, which is perhaps the most important of all, pertains to the outside world and is called the petty tyrant. 
Don Juan stopped talking and stared at me fixedly. There was an awkward silence; then he started to talk about stalking. He said that it had very humble and fortuitous origins. It started from an observation the new seers made that when warriors steadily behave in ways not customary for them, the unused emanations inside their cocoons begin to glow. And their assemblage points shift in a mild, harmonious, barely noticeable fashion. 
Stimulated by this observation, the new seers began to practice the systematic control of their behavior. They called this practice the art of stalking. Don Juan remarked that the name, although objectionable, was appropriate, because stalking entailed a specific kind of behavior with people, behavior that could be categorized as surreptitious. 
The new seers, armed with this technique, tackled the known in a sober and fruitful way. 
By continual practice, they made their assemblage points move steadily. 
"Stalking is one of the two greatest accomplishments of the new seers." he said. "The new seers decided that it should be taught to a modern-day nagual when his assemblage point has moved quite deep into the left side. The reason for this decision is that a nagual must learn the principles of stalking without the encumbrance of the human inventory. After all, the nagual is the leader of a group, and to lead them he has to act quickly without first having to think about it. 
"Other warriors can learn stalking in their normal awareness, although it is advisable that they do it in heightened awareness - not so much because of the value of heightened awareness, but because it imbues stalking with a mystery that it doesn't really have; stalking is merely behavior with people." 
He said that I could now understand that shifting the assemblage point was the reason why the new seers placed such a high value on the interaction with petty tyrants. Petty tyrants forced seers to use the principles of stalking and, in doing so, helped seers to move their assemblage points. 
I asked him if the old seers knew anything at all about the principles of stalking. 
"Stalking belongs exclusively to the new seers," he said, smiling. "They are the only seers who had to deal with people. The old ones were so wrapped up in their sense of power that they didn't even know that people existed, until people started clobbering them on the head. But you already know all this." 
He said that as time passed and the new seers established their practices, they realized that under the prevailing conditions of life, stalking only moved the assemblage points minimally. For maximum effect, stalking needed an ideal setting; it needed petty tyrants in positions of great authority and power.  It became increasingly difficult for the new seers to place themselves in such situations; the task of improvising them or seeking them out became an unbearable burden. 
He explained that stalking practices are not something one can rejoice in; in fact, they are downright objectionable. Knowing this, the new seers realize that it would be against everybody's interest to discuss or practice the principles of stalking in normal awareness. 
I pointed out to him an incongruity. He had said that there is no way for warriors to act in the world while they are in heightened awareness, and he had also said that stalking is simply behaving with people in specific ways. The two statements contradicted each other. 
"By not teaching it in normal awareness I was referring only to teaching it to a nagual," he said. "The purpose of stalking is twofold: first, to move the assemblage point as steadily and safely as possible, and nothing can do the job as well as stalking: second, to imprint its principles at such a deep level that the human inventory is bypassed, as is the natural reaction of refusing and judging something that may be offensive to reason." 
The art of stalking is the riddle of the heart; the puzzlement sorcerers feel upon becoming aware of two things: first that the world appears to us to be unalterably objective and factual, because of peculiarities of our awareness and perception; second, that if different peculiarities of perception come into play, the very things about the world that seem so unalterably objective and factual change. 
"We are going to talk now about the third abstract core," don Juan said. "It is called the trickery of the spirit, or the trickery of the abstract, or stalking oneself, or dusting the link." 
"The art of stalking is learning all the quirks of your disguise," Belisario said, paying no attention to what don Juan was telling him. "And it is to learn them so well no one will know you are disguised. For that you need to be ruthless, cunning, patient, and sweet." 
He made don Juan practice his womanly behavior skills in every town they passed through. 
And don Juan honestly believed he was teaching him to be an actor. But Belisario insisted that he was teaching him the art of stalking. He told don Juan that stalking was an art applicable to everything, and that there were four steps to learning it: ruthlessness, cunning, patience, and sweetness. 
I felt compelled to interrupt his account once more. 
"But isn't stalking taught in deep, heightened awareness?" I asked. 
"Of course," he replied with a grin. "But you have to understand that for some men wearing women's clothes is the door into heightened awareness. In fact, such means are more effective than pushing the assemblage point, but are very difficult to arrange." 
Don Juan said that his benefactor drilled him daily in the four moods of stalking and insisted that don Juan understand that ruthlessness should not be harshness, cunning should not be cruelty, patience should not be negligence, and sweetness should not be foolishness. 
He taught him that these four steps had to be practiced and perfected until they were so smooth they were unnoticeable. He believed women to be natural stalkers. And his conviction was so strong he maintained that only in a woman's disguise could any man really learn the art of stalking. 
"I went with him to every market in every town we passed and haggled with everyone," don Juan went on. "My benefactor used to stay to one side watching me. 'Be ruthless but charming,' he used to say. 'Be cunning but nice. Be patient but active. Be sweet but lethal. Only women can do it. If a man acts this way he's being prissy.' " 
Don Juan explained to me that ruthlessness, cunning, patience, and sweetness were the essence of stalking. They were the basics that with all their ramifications had to be taught in careful, meticulous steps. 
He stressed repeatedly that teaching stalking was one of the most difficult things sorcerers did.  And he insisted that no matter what they themselves did to teach me stalking, and no matter what I believed to the contrary, it was impeccability which dictated their acts. 
He asserted that stalking was the beginning, and that before anything could be attempted on the warrior's path, warriors must learn to stalk; next they must learn to intend, and only then could they move their assemblage point at will. 
"The very first principle of stalking is that a warrior stalks himself," he said. "He stalks himself ruthlessly, cunningly, patiently, and sweetly." 
I wanted to laugh, but he did not give me time. Very succinctly he defined stalking as the art of using behavior in novel ways for specific purposes. He said that normal human behavior in the world of everyday life was routine. Any behavior that broke from routine caused an unusual effect on our total being. That unusual effect was what sorcerers sought, because it was cumulative. 
"The real challenge for those sorcerer seers," don Juan went on, "was finding a system of behavior that was neither petty nor capricious, but that combined the morality and the sense of beauty which differentiates sorcerer seers from plain witches." 
He said that for sorcerers stalking was the foundation on which everything else they did was built. 
"Some sorcerers object to the term stalking," he went on, "but the name came about because it entails surreptitious behavior. 
"It's also called the art of stealth, but that term is equally unfortunate. We ourselves, because of our nonmilitant temperament, call it the art of controlled folly. You can call it anything you wish. We, however, will continue with the term stalking since it's so easy to say stalker and, as my benefactor used to say, so awkward to say controlled folly maker." 
"When the pressure of their connecting link is too great, sorcerers relieve it by stalking themselves." 
"I still don't think I understand what you mean by stalking" I said. "But at a certain level I think I know exactly what you mean." 
"I'll try to help you clarify what you know, then," he said. "Stalking is a procedure, a very simple one. Stalking is special behavior that follows certain principles. It is secretive, furtive, deceptive behavior designed to deliver a jolt. And, when you stalk yourself you jolt yourself, using your own behavior in a ruthless, cunning way." 
He explained that when a sorcerer's awareness became bogged down with the weight of his perceptual input, which was what was happening to me, the best, or even perhaps the only remedy was to use the idea of death to deliver that stalking jolt. 
"Your problem is very simple," he said. "You become easily obsessed. I have been telling you that sorcerers stalk themselves in order to break the power of their obsessions. There are many ways of stalking oneself. If you don't want to use the idea of your death, use the poems you read me to stalk yourself." 
"As I hear the words," don Juan said when I had finished reading, "I feel that that man is seeing the essence of things and I can see with him. I don't care what the poem is about. I care only about the feeling the poet's longing brings me. I borrow his longing, and with it I borrow the beauty. And marvel at the fact that he, like a true warrior, lavishes it on the recipients, the beholders, retaining for himself only his longing. This jolt, this shock of beauty, is stalking." 
"In order to protect themselves from that immensity," don Juan said, "sorcerers learn to maintain a perfect blend of ruthlessness, cunning, patience, and sweetness. These four bases are inextricably bound together. Sorcerers cultivate them by intending them. These bases are, naturally, positions of the assemblage point." 
He went on to say that every act performed by any sorcerer was by definition governed by these four principles. So, properly speaking, every sorcerer's every action is deliberate in thought and realization, and has the specific blend of the four foundations of stalking. 
"Sorcerers use the four moods of stalking as guides," he continued. "These are four different frames of mind, four different brands of intensity that sorcerers can use to induce their assemblage points to move to specific positions." 
He smiled, his eyes shining like two spots of light. He said that sorcerers, in an effort to protect themselves from the overwhelming effect of silent knowledge, developed the art of stalking. Stalking moves the assemblage point minutely but steadily, thus giving sorcerers time and therefore the possibility of buttressing themselves. 
"Within the art of stalking," don Juan continued, "there is a technique which sorcerers use a great deal: controlled folly. Sorcerers claim that controlled folly is the only way they have of dealing with themselves - in their state of expanded awareness and perception - and with everybody and everything in the world of daily affairs." 
Don Juan had explained controlled folly as the art of controlled deception or the art of pretending to be thoroughly immersed in the action at hand - pretending so well no one could tell it from the real thing. Controlled folly is not an outright deception, he had told me, but a sophisticated, artistic way of being separated from everything while remaining an integral part of everything. 
"Controlled folly is an art," don Juan continued. "A very bothersome art, and a difficult one to learn. Many sorcerers don't have the stomach for it, not because there is anything inherently wrong with the art, but because it takes a lot of energy to exercise it." 
Don Juan admitted that he practiced it conscientiously, although he was not particularly fond of doing so, perhaps because his benefactor had been so adept at it. Or, perhaps it was because his personality - which he said was basically devious and petty - simply did not have the agility needed to practice controlled folly. 
"What was the nagual Elias's reason for training the Tulios as he did?" I asked. 
Don Juan peered at me and laughed loudly. At that instant the lights of the plaza were turned on. He got up from his favorite bench and rubbed it with the palm of his hand, as if it were a pet. 
"Freedom," he said. "He wanted their freedom from perceptual convention. And he taught them to be artists. Stalking is an art. For a sorcerer, since he's not a patron or a seller of art, the only thing of importance about a work of art is that it can be accomplished." 
Don Juan expressed his bewilderment at the fact that out of all the marvelous things the old sorcerers learned exploring those thousands of positions, only the art of dreaming and the art of stalking remain.  
He reiterated that the art of dreaming is concerned with the displacement of the assemblage point. Then he defined stalking as the art that deals with the fixation of the assemblage point on any location to which it is displaced. 
"To fixate the assemblage point on any new spot means to acquire cohesion," he said. "You have been doing just that in your dreaming practices." 
The old sorcerers called the entire act of acquiring uniformity and cohesion outside the normal world stalking perception. 
"The art of stalking," he continued, "as I have already said, deals with the fixation of the assemblage point. The old sorcerers discovered, through practice, that important as it is to displace the assemblage point, it is even more important to make it stay fixed on its new position, wherever that new position might be." 
He explained that if the assemblage point does not become stationary, there is no way that we can perceive coherently. We would experience then a kaleidoscope of disassociated images. This is the reason the old sorcerers put as much emphasis on dreaming as they did on stalking. 
One art cannot exist without the other, especially for the kinds of activities in which the old sorcerers were involved. 
"Let your energy body intend to reach the optimum dreaming position," he explained. 
"Then, let your energy body intend to stay at that position and you will be stalking." 
"We can't have dealings with them [IB’s]," he answered, "and yet we can't stay away from them. My solution has been to take their energy but not give in to their influence. This is known as the ultimate stalking. 
"I'm going to propose a line of action for you," he said in a curt tone when we had finished our lunch. "It's the last task of the third gate of dreaming, and it consists of stalking the stalkers, a most mysterious maneuver. To stalk the stalkers means to deliberately draw energy from the inorganic beings' realm in order to perform a sorcery feat." 
"I want you two to break the boundaries of the normal world and, using awareness as an energetic element, enter into another," he said. "This breaking and entering amounts to stalking the stalkers. Using awareness as an element of the environment bypasses the influence of the inorganic beings, but it still uses their energy." 
"Your total physical mass has to be added to your energy body," don Juan replied, looking into her eyes. "The great difficulty of this maneuver is to discipline the energy body, a thing the two of you have already done. Lack of discipline is the only reason the two of you may fail in performing this feat of ultimate stalking. Sometimes, as a fluke, an average person ends up performing it and entering into another world. But this is immediately explained away as insanity or hallucination."
Reply
#2



“In order to practice stalking and controlled folly, since
it is not a way to fool or chastise people or feel superior to them, one has to
be capable of laughing at oneself. Florinda said that one of the results of a
detailed recapitulation is genuine laughter upon coming face to face with the
boring repetition of one's self-esteem, which is at the core of all human
interaction.” 


The words ‘stalking’ and ‘controlled folly’ get a lot of use,
yet if you keep to the simple quote as mentioned above, you’re on the right
track.  It’s often said that, “So and so
is stalking the board, or stalking in chat, or stalking someone else, etc.,
etc.”  Incorrect.  This is ego and self importance from giver
and receiver.  Keep in mind that ego and self
importance are smarter than ‘you,’ WAY smarter. 
This needs repeating.  


Your ego and self importance are smarter than ‘you,’ WAY
smarter. 


Discussion boards, chats, the written or spoken word
anywhere is ego’s playground.  All
stalking is self stalking.  Being
concerned with another individual, lying in wait in any shape or form to point
anything out to them is ego and self importance. 


The tool used in stalking is the recapitulation which will
be discussed in another post.  Just
choose one thing in your self importance and begin.  Don’t fret over terminology such as fixating
the assemblage point, moving it, seeing, ruthlessness, cunning, patience and
sweetness, Tulio and his antics, etc., etc. 
Just choose one thing and get to the bottom of it.  When you can get to the bottom of one thing
you’ll have gotten to the bottom of every-thing.  This also need be repeated. 


When you get to the bottom of one thing you’ll have gotten
to the bottom of every-thing.  


…but don’t worry about that now, either.  Just choose one thing in your self importance
and stalk it. 


Controlled folly is employed with other people; yet don’t
concern yourself over that just yet either. 
If you’ve yet to do any recapitulation, then you are just messing with
people and they may see you as a bit strange. 
This ‘messing with people’ is what we often see in chat and on
discussion boards, not stalking or controlled folly.  If you want to mess with people that’s fine,
just don’t label it stalking or controlled folly. 


If anyone should get to the point in stalking and recapitulation
where one needs ‘another,’ then the stalker will glean from this other person
traits that need be self-stalked.  That’s
it.  Some may say that dealing with
others in a warrior’s way is controlled folly. 
Let’s clear that up. 


Think vehicles and destinations.  Stalking/recapitulation of self is the
vehicle, the doing.  Controlled folly is
the destination, the result.  You can’t
‘do’ controlled folly.  It’s the result
OF recapitulation and self stalking.  If
you think you are stalking another, or performing controlled folly with another
then you are just messing with them. 
Controlled folly emerges out of the empty self and then the end of the
quote above begins to make sense.  “The
results of a detailed recapitulation is genuine laughter upon coming face to
face with the boring repetition of one's self-esteem, which is at the core of
all human interaction.” 


Controlled folly such as Don Juan and others mention and
describe is performed once one has passed the barrier of the gateless gate, the
totality of self, and there is no use in discussing it here. 


SHM
Reply
#3
What is the difference between controlled folly and dream ? If I dream a do a certain interaction with world, If I do controlled folly I do interaction with people, but even getting into influence of IOBs is foolish=folly so what about that influence Don Juan Matus(Juma Antus) was speaking speaking about ? does it has something to do with the interaction of people the chains - the attachments that we get when we act without controlling our folly ? and if so what the *** the Control mean ? If we are to cross something which is gateless gate in means of something that is Uncontrolable Control ?
So if all human interaction is in core self-esteem...How can you become something else ? Are we doomed to the end of infinity to serve the self-esteem ?
I want to discuss the "tabu" the "one which should not be disscussed", can you please tell me how you can cross gateless gate, how you can cross a gate that is without gate which means that you are already there ? how you going to pass through the barrier of something which has no barrier, no gate ? Or is something little else behind all that words of this fool SHM and even bigger fool Don Juan ?
Or am I the biggest fool because I make fool out of everyone, because I really piss on all boundaries...barriers...? and if I am fool by doing so... what it in makes from you? Or more properly said what it didnt made in you...
Reply
#4
One more (su)guesstion If its good for us to not get under the influence of inorganic beigns, how is it possible that the attachments of energy - the chains that are created by our not controled folly, can be broken by chains created by non-attachment the controlled folly ??? Because if I control something I got it in chains...if I do not I have no control - nothing bounds it in place...
So when I connect 1 and 1 together the Controlled folly which is done by controlling chains - controlling controlled does it has something in common with gateless gate like...
If you want to cross gate without gates you must see gate inside gate or more properly said gate inside EVERY gate as everything we do is controlled folly right ??
and also the dreaming could be said of as gate as thats what it does...it opens another world so my (su)guesstion is... Is everything boundless in other word the "Infinity" as it would again fit the description of "gateless gate" and so does it mean that I must start to think of everything as of boundless bound ?
Sincerely your Con(tra)(nse) Troll. nse= Nice Saw Energy
Nice=Trough as light shines, as we all shine so... shining must be nice or it is not ? and what it does make of us if we dont like the Shine - the something that goes through...that shines somewhere...when we are luminous beigns ? Which means that every shine must penetrate through darkness or more properly said in the world of more shinings connects them and make from the a bigger ray of light...
Reply
#5
NagualHuman wrote:One more (su)guesstion If its good for us to not get under the influence of inorganic beigns, how is it possible that the attachments of energy - the chains that are created by our not controled folly, can be broken by chains created by non-attachment the controlled folly ??? Because if I control something I got it in chains...if I do not I have no control - nothing bounds it in place...
So when I connect 1 and 1 together the Controlled folly which is done by controlling chains - controlling controlled does it has something in common with gateless gate like...
If you want to cross gate without gates you must see gate inside gate or more properly said gate inside EVERY gate as everything we do is controlled folly right ??
and also the dreaming could be said of as gate as thats what it does...it opens another world so my (su)guesstion is... Is everything boundless in other word the "Infinity" as it would again fit the description of "gateless gate" and so does it mean that I must start to think of everything as of boundless bound ?
Sincerely your Con(tra)(nse) Troll. nse= Nice Saw Energy
Nice=Trough as light shines, as we all shine so... shining must be nice or it is not ? and what it does make of us if we dont like the Shine - the something that goes through...that shines somewhere...when we are luminous beigns ? Which means that every shine must penetrate through darkness or more properly said in the world of more shinings connects them and make from the a bigger ray of light...Beautiful.
Reply
#6
~



Hi NagualHuman.  

I don't enter into question and answer discussions unless it's a question regarding exactly where the questioner is.  Your comments and questions may be 'beautiful' as Kao mentioned, but it's all just more belief to me and I don't deal with that; my job is about assisting others in assassinating belief, not promote it.  I'm the one handing you or anyone else a grenade.  You are the one who has to pull the pin and demolish self.  (Eliminating beliefs, personal history, self importance, etc., etc.)  

You don't need to add me or anyone else to your equation, you need to subtract yourself.  Begin by re-examining your assumptions.  It's clear from your posts that you consider yourself a serious person, a serious seeker.  That's the first assumption you'll want to challenge.  You're sure that a serious seeker is what you are and you think I (and others) see you that way too, but this is not the case.  I know serious when I see it and I know a hand-puppet of self importance and ego when I see it.  You think you're on top of something, but the only thing to be on top of is ego and self importance, and it's on top of you like a house on a mouse.  

Maybe if we were to have a discussion one day I would tell you to cut off an ounce of your body every day until you can answer the question, "Who am I?"  Any ounce as long as it's an ounce. That should bring you quickly into focus; light a fire under you.  If you had to do this, cut off an ounce of your body every day, how much time do you think you would waste writing posts full of CC lingo and twirling it around like a fancy six-shooter?  Not bloody much.  You would soon become a self-stalking-recapitulation-machine.  Sleep and food would be reduced to barest minimums.  Relationships and activities once deemed essential would be forgotten.  You would enter into a burning mania of single-pointedness.  Soon, anything other than the question Who am I? would seem comically irrelevant.  There's your new-warrior's way; the warrior's way for the new millennium.  

Who am I?  That's the only koan there is; the only one anyone ever needs.  Every day you don't answer this question, another ounce.  Take a moment to think about what it would mean to have to sit down with a scalpel at a certain time every day and amputate an ounce of your body.  You would quickly have to learn things about asking and answering, about how the process of recapitulation works and doesn't work, about how to help it and how to get out of its way.  You would have to learn how to unlearn, un-do.  You would discard clever CC concepts for cold facts, pretty CC vocabulary for words of scientific precision.  The process is one of 'seeing' clearly, not just blindly lashing out.  The act of seeing clearly takes time and resources and the mind must work almost ceaselessly at levels far beyond the everyday.  

As barbaric and unthinkable as this ounce-a-day approach may seem, I can assure you that anyone who has ever managed to awaken to the totality of self was driven by equally unendurable mental and emotional forces.  

This is where the process of recapitulation comes in.  Recapitulation is ultimately about clear seeing; clearly seeing what is, which is what we do when we stop seeing what's not.  We can use recapitulation to raise the ordinary powers of the mind up to the extraordinary levels necessary in order to see life and the world and ourselves as they truly are.  

Your CC lingo or spirituality or whatever you choose to call it is just another false garment, another layer of the lie of self.  Your spirituality defines the dimensions of your cell and the fact that you don't see that tells me that you have no idea where you are or whose rules you are living under.  You have no grasp of your true situation, of the nature of your captive status.  You're clinging desperately to your lies; shielding them with emotional energy.  Why?  Because these lies are you.  They are who you are.  You don't have imperfections, you are imperfections.  Ask yourself why you even wrote the posts above?  What's the point?  None of what I'm saying is new to you.  And you here you are, writing impassioned posts, trying to stand your lies back up on their feet.  If you like your lies, fine, but you're not going to make them true through the power of your conviction.  Who you are is a lie; that's a fact.  You're a fictional character in a state of wondrous denial.

A serious person must remember at all times where he is and who's running the show.  This is Ego's house.  It controls everything.  It has every advantage.  Why not drop all these fancy terms and posts and just begin.  As per the previous post, pick one thing and start the recapitulation.  

Or not.  

SHM
Reply
#7
The problem is I have no sovereign over me, I given myself to the force, I see no boundaries only that which I made by myself, your problem is that you do not see anything behind my words because you are too much serious about yourself and your proggress taking it deadly serious, you are just cutting your pieces and you scream because you perceive it as pain... I know who I am is a lie, but I know everything is a lie...everything is just another bound and belief...and thus it allows to me to be the greatest the best, the swiftest, the one with the last word... You havent answered my single question yet you again repeat the words of CC or whatever bible you use, I see noone of your ORIGINALITY and thats makes me sad...
You are able to speak about how I am bad and what I deny, make bad etc. but you havent sayeth to me a single world of light a single word that would make something clearer, nothing new on your account... and tell me that I am bad because I see no sovereign over me no voice that tells me that world that is on my head saying that I am doing something wrong or that I made something not good enough...
I work on the opposital side of the wave.... can you understand what I mean ?
Reply
#8
stalker/ing , i have personally witnessed / witness to be like this .
kings and queens were made to be ,
each given a staff,

each told a story to power and importance,
in itself given a mirror to gaze into ,
looking down into the mirror ,

they saw they were dreaming their self ,
one side of the mirror and another ,
throwing a stone into the mirrored pond created a ripple ,
the stalker and dreamer seeked them self,
this is where i differ to what i head ,
when stalking the self ,

perhaps it was best not to completely lose the self ,
as the reflection required to throw a stone ,
towards ones dreamer , was stalking ,
in silence the reflection awaited to be discovered ,
and each time thrown ,

a feed back ,
yelling at reflections ,

and stalking as such ,
the animal hunted ,

was to be found to be following a path ,
the other side of a self ,
which could only be witnessed ,
as it was not stationary ,
as such an old reflection would indicate a shadow / path ,
as such the intervention through integration ,
would indicate an immensity ,
witnessed and used ,

so the self annhialation necessary to arrive at another self ,

in facet one self,
so not necessary to indicate ,
path as lying in wait for this hunter ,
the indication ,
is the realisation of the inseparation brought about by the emergence of

heart ,
how so ?
the mergence .

absolute faith and assurance ,
of absolute foot on path .

which center brought about mergence ?
totality ,
heart ,

guidance ,

seeking balance ,

she and he ,
so ,

stalking is about dreaming ,
awakening within the dream ,
throwing pebbles to capture reflections ,
of infinity.
Reply
#9
"The art of stalking was introduced to me as a set of procedures and attitudes that enabled one to get the best out of any conceivable situation."

this explains a lot about you kris....

could stalking be anything else , but the use of will and power in the tonal/dreaming realms?
Reply
#10
No.
Reply
#11
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)