06-25-2012, 12:00 AM
Vultures depicted reaching for headless
human bodies. The originals are drawn in red.]
[Image: Catal Huyuk, Central
Anatolia, 7400 to 6200 BC.
... the vultures
Catal Huyuk also had a fascination with vultures, shown in murals as
giant birds, rendered in red, biting after headless corpses. Some vultures
are depicted with human feet, actually a close approximation of vulture
feet. There are wall sculptures of breasts which include vulture beaks
breaking out to form the nipples. This is an obscure iconography.
Amigo has posted me on Apr 06, 2012 at 12:45 am
The knowledge I'm posting is being banned on Sustained Reaction but you can read the banned posts here:
http://sorcery.yuku.com/topic/3693/The- ... -Sorcerers
This post too, posted on Sustained Action has been banned:
Scout1 says:
>motto: Experience is the source of all knowledge. - Edmund Husserl
Yep, ya gotta go the distance to see the other side.
What
Castaneda describes is outlandish by far and not in anyway acceptable
to the linearity of the socially conditioned (brainwashed) mind.
What
is astounding and cannot be over or understressed is the main
anthropological view that human beings have no significant predator.
The
earth has been around for nearly 5 billion years and every single
species that has evolved here on this planet has had a significant
predator.
The
scholarly evolutionary and anthropological view is that man has no
predator. Sure, the scholarly academic view is that Man is unique, we
are the only
creatures
on the planet that have "intelligence" to the extraordinarily high
degree that we exhibit it. And yet the academic view fails to account
for the
fact that - just like all the species that came before us - in the long line of evolution- had a predator.
Of
course, to take Castaneda at his word and to say that a predator exists
that preys specifically on human beings by in large fixing their
attention and hence their perception into the stagnant view that this
world is all there is (ie. that there are no other worlds for mankind to
journey to). It is certainly worthy of investigation.
Has
anyone experienced directly the predator? Has anyone used the
techniques of Castaneda to 'see' the predator. I know of many religious
texts that have been passed down for millenia that describe the
existence of demons.
Don
Juan is purported to have stated that the Cosmic Predator came 10,000
years ago and enslaved humanity. This around the same time that
agriculture started, the domestication of animals began and humans began
to live in cities.
Evidence
of 'flyers' - the cosmic predator is can be inferred from the paintings
on the walls of Catal Huyuk, Central Anatolia, 7400 to 6200 BC. where
-" Vultures are depicted reaching for headless human bodies. The originals are drawn in red."
http://saturniancosmology.org/arch.php
".
. . biting after headless corpses. Some vultures are depicted with
human feet, actually a close approximation of vulture feet. There are
wall sculptures of breasts which include vulture beaks breaking out to
form the nipples."
Odd
isn't it? Are they describing the invasion of a predator that they
could see and depicting how it affected their fellow men and women? The
human figures are headless and is the'vulture' replacing their heads,
their 'minds'? Why do the vultures have human feet? Didn't Castaneda and
don Juan say that the result of the predator eating human awareness is a
fringe of awareness that only goes up to the toes?
And
what of these ancient peoples worship of bull horns? (see image same
page) Archeaologists call a shrine room the "horns of concentration."
Was this where these people turned in order to protect themselves, their
'minds' from being eaten? Did they realize a certain degree of
concentration was needed so they would not become 'prey' to the vultures
(flyers). I think there is evidence here at Catal Huyuk that shows
early man was aware of the flyers and these people do show human beings
becoming headless, (mindless) humans afflicted with the vultures
voracious appetite down to the toe level.
human bodies. The originals are drawn in red.]
[Image: Catal Huyuk, Central
Anatolia, 7400 to 6200 BC.
... the vultures
Catal Huyuk also had a fascination with vultures, shown in murals as
giant birds, rendered in red, biting after headless corpses. Some vultures
are depicted with human feet, actually a close approximation of vulture
feet. There are wall sculptures of breasts which include vulture beaks
breaking out to form the nipples. This is an obscure iconography.
Amigo has posted me on Apr 06, 2012 at 12:45 am
The knowledge I'm posting is being banned on Sustained Reaction but you can read the banned posts here:
http://sorcery.yuku.com/topic/3693/The- ... -Sorcerers
This post too, posted on Sustained Action has been banned:
Scout1 says:
>motto: Experience is the source of all knowledge. - Edmund Husserl
Yep, ya gotta go the distance to see the other side.
What
Castaneda describes is outlandish by far and not in anyway acceptable
to the linearity of the socially conditioned (brainwashed) mind.
What
is astounding and cannot be over or understressed is the main
anthropological view that human beings have no significant predator.
The
earth has been around for nearly 5 billion years and every single
species that has evolved here on this planet has had a significant
predator.
The
scholarly evolutionary and anthropological view is that man has no
predator. Sure, the scholarly academic view is that Man is unique, we
are the only
creatures
on the planet that have "intelligence" to the extraordinarily high
degree that we exhibit it. And yet the academic view fails to account
for the
fact that - just like all the species that came before us - in the long line of evolution- had a predator.
Of
course, to take Castaneda at his word and to say that a predator exists
that preys specifically on human beings by in large fixing their
attention and hence their perception into the stagnant view that this
world is all there is (ie. that there are no other worlds for mankind to
journey to). It is certainly worthy of investigation.
Has
anyone experienced directly the predator? Has anyone used the
techniques of Castaneda to 'see' the predator. I know of many religious
texts that have been passed down for millenia that describe the
existence of demons.
Don
Juan is purported to have stated that the Cosmic Predator came 10,000
years ago and enslaved humanity. This around the same time that
agriculture started, the domestication of animals began and humans began
to live in cities.
Evidence
of 'flyers' - the cosmic predator is can be inferred from the paintings
on the walls of Catal Huyuk, Central Anatolia, 7400 to 6200 BC. where
-" Vultures are depicted reaching for headless human bodies. The originals are drawn in red."
http://saturniancosmology.org/arch.php
".
. . biting after headless corpses. Some vultures are depicted with
human feet, actually a close approximation of vulture feet. There are
wall sculptures of breasts which include vulture beaks breaking out to
form the nipples."
Odd
isn't it? Are they describing the invasion of a predator that they
could see and depicting how it affected their fellow men and women? The
human figures are headless and is the'vulture' replacing their heads,
their 'minds'? Why do the vultures have human feet? Didn't Castaneda and
don Juan say that the result of the predator eating human awareness is a
fringe of awareness that only goes up to the toes?
And
what of these ancient peoples worship of bull horns? (see image same
page) Archeaologists call a shrine room the "horns of concentration."
Was this where these people turned in order to protect themselves, their
'minds' from being eaten? Did they realize a certain degree of
concentration was needed so they would not become 'prey' to the vultures
(flyers). I think there is evidence here at Catal Huyuk that shows
early man was aware of the flyers and these people do show human beings
becoming headless, (mindless) humans afflicted with the vultures
voracious appetite down to the toe level.