06-30-2005, 12:00 AM
The realization that there was an organized, intelligent opposition to good out in there, actually helped lift me from a spell of withdrawal from the world. I began to find myself getting involved in activism like never before and taking up what I believed were good causes.
I met J in a group involved in a very positive, non-political cause. The members however, sure had their own strong political ideas. At one point, someone passed on some information that I immediately recognized was a truthful exposure of one of the biggest mass deceptions we have all been affected by recently. I always had my suspicions, but these new facts brought before me, confirmed my worst fears about it. I had a very angry reaction. J and I got into a conversation about it. Although he agreed with the veracity of the revelations, he was more concerned about my reaction and proceeded to deliver the following dissertation:
It is always pleasant to verify that there's a growing number of folks becoming immune to a few things, of which, they themselves probably don't even know that have been attacking them fiercely without their knowledge or awareness.
I told him what he was saying sounded cryptic and a bit sinister.
Please allow me to bother you a few moments now with some of my out of order convictions. If for nothing else, it might at least give you some food for thought and engender some ideas of your own as to ways to improve dealing with and handling yourself in day-to-day affairs.
Something deep inside prompted me to listen very carefully.
People are always against something, no matter what it might be. As long as it doesn't conform to their personal views on morals, ethics, behavior, etc, or it somehow threatens those views, they will assume a posture of being against it. And depending on its severity, gravity or even urgency, they will proceed to defend themselves and/or to fight that matter. They really believe that to fight it is the only way of ending it, or at least keeping it on a short leash so as to minimize its negative effects.
Well, do I have news for you. I'm not against anything. I'm rather ALWAYS "in favor" of something. Sounds bizarre, does it not? Yes. But don't forget that in Life, nothing, absolutely nothing is what it seems.
I actually very much resonated with what J was saying, but no body had ever put it quite this way before.
When we look at things, we usually only see what either conforms to our expectations of what we should see when we look, or else to what we want to see, regardless of what may actually be presenting itself at the moment.
The act of seeing as humans commonly use it, is not understood by 99% of us on this planet. Science tells us we see through our eyes, due to light reflecting off objects and being converted into electrical signals that proceed to wind their way to our organic brain, where they are then decoded, interpreted and identified as being this or that.
This isnt so, not even by a long shot. I would have to write a very thick tome to pass on all my understanding on this issue. So, Ill simply tell you a very brief and "compressed" idea of the whole thing.
To start with, the brain decodes the information. This decoding is nothing more than the classification or labeling of the signals reaching it. For example, the signals that refer to the legs of a chair will have a characteristic, while the signals that refer to the seat will have another one and the whole thing will have yet another one, so as to define the chair as an individual object with some specific characteristics. Such definitions are the building blocks of the brain's database structure.
Next, it will interpret the signals. And here is where the **** starts to hit the fan and smell really bad, as far as the mighty, arrogant scientific establishment is concerned in their explanations to the rest of us, humble sheep under their tutelage. The process of interpretation is one of analyzing. Now, to do so, there must be some pre-existing information available, as a reference platform or table of contents, so to speak, upon which to establish the analysis.
Since we are all born ignorant, and the brain comes into being like a blank slate, that is, completely empty of any information of any kind, how the hell would anybody be able to start to label and interpret the constant data reaching their brain, if there is no reference to establish an analysis?
Then comes identification, the final labeling of the product of the two previous operations, the decoding and the interpretation. Identification is a process of comparison. Again, since the brain is empty at birth, how is identification to be achieved, huh?
The act of seeing has nothing to do with the physical eyes. The mechanism through which any sentient, organic creature sees is not even located in the organic vessel, but is rather extraneous to it. Its main interface device is equally located outside, in the immediate vicinity within the vessel's outer energetic field. This is what some call the aura, but I see it simply as an energetic field.
Now. I said we don't need our physical eyes to see. And I say it again. Every single cell of our organic body, which might at any given moment be exposed to the environment as our eyes are, is receiving exactly the same light reflections as our eyes receive. The only reason why we use our eyes predominantly is because such has been the programming, the teaching which we have all been subject to since the moment of birth.
Our parents are the first ones to teach us that great thing which is to see with our eyes. And if for some reason our eyes come with a faulty circuitry, we are condemned to live in complete ignorance of seeing, while all along billions of cells in our body are receiving all the images we would like to see. But because science says that without eyes we are blind, thats exactly how the brain behaves. It simply ignores the signals coming from the cells as seeing signals and uses them strictly according to how it has been programmed to use them as feeling signals for touch, aromatic signals for smell and taste and sound signals for hearing. And all the while, the seeing signals are there as well. But the brain has been programmed to ignore them as such if they do not come from the eyes.
But wait, there's more. Even if by some terrible aberration of the circuitry, my brain was completely disconnected from all physical receiving sensors in my body, I personally would still be able to see, hear, taste, smell, feel and do something else, as well as I do now. Why? Because I have understood after probing into it long ago, that the act of seeing does not originate in the physical vessel. And so could millions of so called "disabled" persons, in order to have better lives, as we shall come to achieve, in due time.
Anyway. All this for what? To give your brain enough reference material to better process what follows.
This was certainly more than I bargained for at the start of our conversation. On the surface, it struck me as a bit eccentric. But really, I was riveted. Js every word struck me at a deep and familiar level I cannot adequately verbalize. I had an eerie cognition that I had been preparing for a long time to hear what J was about to disclose.
To be continued.
- Toltechie
I met J in a group involved in a very positive, non-political cause. The members however, sure had their own strong political ideas. At one point, someone passed on some information that I immediately recognized was a truthful exposure of one of the biggest mass deceptions we have all been affected by recently. I always had my suspicions, but these new facts brought before me, confirmed my worst fears about it. I had a very angry reaction. J and I got into a conversation about it. Although he agreed with the veracity of the revelations, he was more concerned about my reaction and proceeded to deliver the following dissertation:
It is always pleasant to verify that there's a growing number of folks becoming immune to a few things, of which, they themselves probably don't even know that have been attacking them fiercely without their knowledge or awareness.
I told him what he was saying sounded cryptic and a bit sinister.
Please allow me to bother you a few moments now with some of my out of order convictions. If for nothing else, it might at least give you some food for thought and engender some ideas of your own as to ways to improve dealing with and handling yourself in day-to-day affairs.
Something deep inside prompted me to listen very carefully.
People are always against something, no matter what it might be. As long as it doesn't conform to their personal views on morals, ethics, behavior, etc, or it somehow threatens those views, they will assume a posture of being against it. And depending on its severity, gravity or even urgency, they will proceed to defend themselves and/or to fight that matter. They really believe that to fight it is the only way of ending it, or at least keeping it on a short leash so as to minimize its negative effects.
Well, do I have news for you. I'm not against anything. I'm rather ALWAYS "in favor" of something. Sounds bizarre, does it not? Yes. But don't forget that in Life, nothing, absolutely nothing is what it seems.
I actually very much resonated with what J was saying, but no body had ever put it quite this way before.
When we look at things, we usually only see what either conforms to our expectations of what we should see when we look, or else to what we want to see, regardless of what may actually be presenting itself at the moment.
The act of seeing as humans commonly use it, is not understood by 99% of us on this planet. Science tells us we see through our eyes, due to light reflecting off objects and being converted into electrical signals that proceed to wind their way to our organic brain, where they are then decoded, interpreted and identified as being this or that.
This isnt so, not even by a long shot. I would have to write a very thick tome to pass on all my understanding on this issue. So, Ill simply tell you a very brief and "compressed" idea of the whole thing.
To start with, the brain decodes the information. This decoding is nothing more than the classification or labeling of the signals reaching it. For example, the signals that refer to the legs of a chair will have a characteristic, while the signals that refer to the seat will have another one and the whole thing will have yet another one, so as to define the chair as an individual object with some specific characteristics. Such definitions are the building blocks of the brain's database structure.
Next, it will interpret the signals. And here is where the **** starts to hit the fan and smell really bad, as far as the mighty, arrogant scientific establishment is concerned in their explanations to the rest of us, humble sheep under their tutelage. The process of interpretation is one of analyzing. Now, to do so, there must be some pre-existing information available, as a reference platform or table of contents, so to speak, upon which to establish the analysis.
Since we are all born ignorant, and the brain comes into being like a blank slate, that is, completely empty of any information of any kind, how the hell would anybody be able to start to label and interpret the constant data reaching their brain, if there is no reference to establish an analysis?
Then comes identification, the final labeling of the product of the two previous operations, the decoding and the interpretation. Identification is a process of comparison. Again, since the brain is empty at birth, how is identification to be achieved, huh?
The act of seeing has nothing to do with the physical eyes. The mechanism through which any sentient, organic creature sees is not even located in the organic vessel, but is rather extraneous to it. Its main interface device is equally located outside, in the immediate vicinity within the vessel's outer energetic field. This is what some call the aura, but I see it simply as an energetic field.
Now. I said we don't need our physical eyes to see. And I say it again. Every single cell of our organic body, which might at any given moment be exposed to the environment as our eyes are, is receiving exactly the same light reflections as our eyes receive. The only reason why we use our eyes predominantly is because such has been the programming, the teaching which we have all been subject to since the moment of birth.
Our parents are the first ones to teach us that great thing which is to see with our eyes. And if for some reason our eyes come with a faulty circuitry, we are condemned to live in complete ignorance of seeing, while all along billions of cells in our body are receiving all the images we would like to see. But because science says that without eyes we are blind, thats exactly how the brain behaves. It simply ignores the signals coming from the cells as seeing signals and uses them strictly according to how it has been programmed to use them as feeling signals for touch, aromatic signals for smell and taste and sound signals for hearing. And all the while, the seeing signals are there as well. But the brain has been programmed to ignore them as such if they do not come from the eyes.
But wait, there's more. Even if by some terrible aberration of the circuitry, my brain was completely disconnected from all physical receiving sensors in my body, I personally would still be able to see, hear, taste, smell, feel and do something else, as well as I do now. Why? Because I have understood after probing into it long ago, that the act of seeing does not originate in the physical vessel. And so could millions of so called "disabled" persons, in order to have better lives, as we shall come to achieve, in due time.
Anyway. All this for what? To give your brain enough reference material to better process what follows.
This was certainly more than I bargained for at the start of our conversation. On the surface, it struck me as a bit eccentric. But really, I was riveted. Js every word struck me at a deep and familiar level I cannot adequately verbalize. I had an eerie cognition that I had been preparing for a long time to hear what J was about to disclose.
To be continued.
- Toltechie