Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scheme of the sections
#24
I really enjoyed reading your reply, had a good laugh . thnx!

the subsection in The Tonal that im thinking of would be something similar topic wise, but the threads expressing something from the poster, not just the quote or video or link, but actual words/expressing ideas/reasons for posting/reactions/interpretation/further work on the subject of the link/pic/video. Looking behind/at/into the stuff that one links, embeds, etc. Kind of + one more step (than is usually seen in The Tonal threads).

more creative writing/art from members and move there creative things from members from the general tonal into the subsection too. I might see/ask if it would be good to make lead/reply options only to members who want to participate (the rest just read or not)... but hm it just occurred to me that what would work is to make threads normally in The Tonal and then move a thread that would 'qualify' to the subsection.

also sorceric/shamanic look at the function/uses of art, stories, etc.
oooor something like that

A bit after i replied to you last time I remember that you associated body parts with the sections, like dreaming with right ribs... Yea, will have to re-read them books..
What is the negative associated with 3rd eye? (I dont really use that concept either, not because i dont like it, i just dont have experiences like some say about 3rd eye throbbing or such. It hit me as i was already writing the next paragraph in my reply, that omg how could i forget there is a 3rd eye concept linked to seeing.. i had to go back and add that sentence into the bracket and felt like a big noob haha, but now Im thinking it was because you dont like the concept haha. good to have a metaphysical excuse ).

If we were to represent the feminine nature of the site in the order of the sections it should be talk, feeling, seeing, dreaming, reason, will

Im glad you agree with the current scheme of the sections, good co-work hehe

-------White Knight wrote:To get in line with spirits designs by waiting to be forced into impeccability is quite optimistic, as it freaks me out even only by speculating what kind of trouble these changes could bring. Preferred style to get into impeccability is by unbending intent, by struggling on your own to be detached. well, just in your previous post you say "...as it is how it works with woman, they must get a kick to enter impeccability."
it is not that i want to be kicked, but it is kinda good to know that there is the possibility of being kicked, sometimes (just sometimes) a kick is better than nothing...
So my advice to start digging a grave in fact is to start ultimate detachment. ... I mean to let go all addictions, I mean to be detached all over your environment. If you cannot detach in your place, you can try that exercise mentioned in book by being buried in hole with leaves, as it would show what your most addictions are.
this and the living in trees was among the top things i drooled over from the books . I, however, do not live in a good climate for this. digging a hole for a flower is hard work around here (but i guess could be done with hard work a few hours for a week or so), but its raining here all the time + im very sensitive to cold. it will need some major planning hehe...
Why cant the same test of detachment be made while lying in bed? I take the lying in earth as a healing, not about seeing attachments/addictions (though sure that is something one can find out while lying in earth for a while) and possibly it is part of the healing to let go... hm...
So yeah, you have to wait for a sign to start your impeccability. few hours after i read this i got a present (it came with a card that said):
Or of course you can wait for a cold fury going on your spine and feeling the presence of the ghost who screams to claim you soul.
(btw youre welcome to write a short terrifying story for the new subsection.. it will be called 'Story Time')
It is your democratic choice, hehe.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Scheme of the sections - by White Knight - 05-14-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by watergaze - 05-14-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by watergaze - 05-14-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by Guest - 05-14-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by delawaredan - 05-14-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by White Knight - 05-14-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by delawaredan - 05-14-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by White Knight - 05-14-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by watergaze - 05-14-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by delawaredan - 05-14-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by Guest - 05-15-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by White Knight - 05-15-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by watergaze - 05-16-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by White Knight - 05-16-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by watergaze - 05-21-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by White Knight - 05-24-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by watergaze - 05-24-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by watergaze - 05-27-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by glance left - 05-27-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by watergaze - 05-27-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by White Knight - 05-28-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by watergaze - 05-29-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by White Knight - 05-30-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by watergaze - 06-01-2013, 12:00 AM
Scheme of the sections - by guest - 08-21-2019, 12:00 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)