12-23-2015, 12:00 AM
"Rooted at the phenomenology of being, I make the ultimate judgement. If at the base, my existence is flawed (I say it is), then it is best accepted that way.. but, NOW I make the next step in truth > I turn (choose to 'pervert') the phenomenology of existence from a negative to a positive by relishing its manifestation even as a negative formation. It is the only reasonable way I know to be thoroughly happy (though I now at least consider the masteries of serloco's ideas in which he rewrites phenomenolgy itself).
I still cannot quite understand his reasoning even if he (I) could perform every miracle. That is a lot of work to comprehend."
Now I understand perfectly. The two concepts are complimentary to each other, they are not exclusive of each other whatsoever. The masteries of 'miracles' is the reasonable course of performing turned phenomenology. I am (I think serloco is) interested in remastering the world as the stage for learning/living ownership of the pain/pleasure medium.
I was a pig greedily eating up, now I've become a reptile, a slithery snake.
I still cannot quite understand his reasoning even if he (I) could perform every miracle. That is a lot of work to comprehend."
Now I understand perfectly. The two concepts are complimentary to each other, they are not exclusive of each other whatsoever. The masteries of 'miracles' is the reasonable course of performing turned phenomenology. I am (I think serloco is) interested in remastering the world as the stage for learning/living ownership of the pain/pleasure medium.
I was a pig greedily eating up, now I've become a reptile, a slithery snake.