06-26-2006, 12:00 AM
Quote:Interweaving elements of entrapment that appear as one thing yet are seen as another. How frightening!
Even more frightening when you see this element appearing behind the eyes of those who speak. Encasement; whispering which way to proceed.
But the question is whose voice and what reality proceeds that voice?
Misappropriation in essence is a contributing factor to the construct created. Whether one is delivered to a cognitive state of enhancement or degradation in essence all elements of syntax are being embezzled by virtue of being here. The largest contributing factor to our perception is the misappropriation of our awareness in terms of it having the calculative maneuverability to discover in essence that it has been misappropriated.
Ones inner voice can appropriate through assimilation, historical data and also ones inner voice can appropriate through experience and even through that experience be misled by virtue of the construct formed.
The voice of interpretation will deliver and interpretation in comparison to the one who possesses it. A voice in essence is but a voice but it is the interpretation of that voice that is the central issue.
A context arising from inner silence may seem to be loud in terms of assimilation that from within challenges the boundaries and emotionality of the conceptual fields that compose the cognitive system of those who witness.
Lujan
I have had this experience that you are speaking of as well; being threatened absolutely to the core by an inanimate object that did increase to the entire construct that contained me within that experience of shock.
- the experience above is not of the eagle; it is of inorganic origin. Even though this seems to be a contradiction, it is not.
What shocked me about this experience is that the corresponding elements that I became aware of had an agenda. It sits behind everything. For example, like when you are in a dream there is something in that dream that is pursuing you on a level of intent that frightens you.
What I saw was the presence of inorganic beings, or shadow beings, outside of a living construct, even though that construct expanded beyond eternity. Nevertheless it was a construct that follows the intent of our eyes that manifest that never-ending universe that is created in correspondence to the entities behind the scenes.
It was not the eagle. The eagle is an idea that has come into manifestation through an emissary and this emissary is CC.
All the available energy of all that focus upon the terminologies put forth, has and will create the manifestations of that terminology, therefore bringing it into being; a description that will only reflect the cognitive system that has been borrowed from one to another.
I know that a lot of people that have followed the path of the warrior have stated they have seen where in actuality they have not. By virtue of this they must guard what they have presented as their reality otherwise they would be liars to themselves and everybody else and we know a lot of CC people are hiding behind this. That is why it is so very important to break fixations upon the terminologies because in essence the terminologies that are not the truth have not come from Juan Matus are slowly becoming the realities which are the wish or the intent of those who want to be beyond who they are and within that wishing they may get what they want, and you know the old saying be careful what you wish for, because in the end that will be the outcome of the intent outlaid, in terms of the compartmentalization, in all its diversity and all forms.
We are in a state of mastery and do not realize this mastery may trap us if we are not careful or has it already?
I know that there are contradictions within what I have just said, but remember there are two sides to a coin - on one side is Juan Matus, on the other side is Castaneda. At the moment the coin is spinning from one to the other because nobody has worked out what is going on and where CC has added himself and said that it was Juan Matus, and if you believe that there is an eagle you will manifest that eagle, but is the eagle in essence a manifestation of inorganic beings through the terminology outlayed through the intent given?
Think about it.
In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?
Even more frightening when you see this element appearing behind the eyes of those who speak. Encasement; whispering which way to proceed.
But the question is whose voice and what reality proceeds that voice?
Misappropriation in essence is a contributing factor to the construct created. Whether one is delivered to a cognitive state of enhancement or degradation in essence all elements of syntax are being embezzled by virtue of being here. The largest contributing factor to our perception is the misappropriation of our awareness in terms of it having the calculative maneuverability to discover in essence that it has been misappropriated.
Ones inner voice can appropriate through assimilation, historical data and also ones inner voice can appropriate through experience and even through that experience be misled by virtue of the construct formed.
The voice of interpretation will deliver and interpretation in comparison to the one who possesses it. A voice in essence is but a voice but it is the interpretation of that voice that is the central issue.
A context arising from inner silence may seem to be loud in terms of assimilation that from within challenges the boundaries and emotionality of the conceptual fields that compose the cognitive system of those who witness.
Lujan
I have had this experience that you are speaking of as well; being threatened absolutely to the core by an inanimate object that did increase to the entire construct that contained me within that experience of shock.
- the experience above is not of the eagle; it is of inorganic origin. Even though this seems to be a contradiction, it is not.
What shocked me about this experience is that the corresponding elements that I became aware of had an agenda. It sits behind everything. For example, like when you are in a dream there is something in that dream that is pursuing you on a level of intent that frightens you.
What I saw was the presence of inorganic beings, or shadow beings, outside of a living construct, even though that construct expanded beyond eternity. Nevertheless it was a construct that follows the intent of our eyes that manifest that never-ending universe that is created in correspondence to the entities behind the scenes.
It was not the eagle. The eagle is an idea that has come into manifestation through an emissary and this emissary is CC.
All the available energy of all that focus upon the terminologies put forth, has and will create the manifestations of that terminology, therefore bringing it into being; a description that will only reflect the cognitive system that has been borrowed from one to another.
I know that a lot of people that have followed the path of the warrior have stated they have seen where in actuality they have not. By virtue of this they must guard what they have presented as their reality otherwise they would be liars to themselves and everybody else and we know a lot of CC people are hiding behind this. That is why it is so very important to break fixations upon the terminologies because in essence the terminologies that are not the truth have not come from Juan Matus are slowly becoming the realities which are the wish or the intent of those who want to be beyond who they are and within that wishing they may get what they want, and you know the old saying be careful what you wish for, because in the end that will be the outcome of the intent outlaid, in terms of the compartmentalization, in all its diversity and all forms.
We are in a state of mastery and do not realize this mastery may trap us if we are not careful or has it already?
I know that there are contradictions within what I have just said, but remember there are two sides to a coin - on one side is Juan Matus, on the other side is Castaneda. At the moment the coin is spinning from one to the other because nobody has worked out what is going on and where CC has added himself and said that it was Juan Matus, and if you believe that there is an eagle you will manifest that eagle, but is the eagle in essence a manifestation of inorganic beings through the terminology outlayed through the intent given?
Think about it.
In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?