03-23-2013, 12:03 AM
cabbageman wrote:
QS is free to do whatever she pleases, anytime, anywhere, anyhow. All of us have the right to free will. She needs not explain herself. She is still going to be on her forum from what I gather so I don't really see the big deal anyways.
there is no "big deal". I only saw people expressing their thoughts on Qs's presence, and more specificly, replying to the idea that we should be happy to see her leave (A concept she introduced in her post...albeit in a joking manner). Its natural for people to reply to QS in the way they did, given the concept/idea being responded to. Not trying to infringe on her rights for self determination. But thanks for the perspective, it is true, even expressing ones feelings or thoughts can be in a way an attempt to impose limitations if one chooses to view it from that perspective. I suppose if one wants to stretch it, and look for that, RM saying dont go could be misinterpreted to fit your perception. But having seen some of the past, posting here, i saw it more as her honest reaction to the prospect; despite some past friction, she recognizes the value of what QS is and shares. I dont see any of that as negative. Then again, "Seeing" is often the issue. As is the internal dialogue...so who knows what we see
QS is free to do whatever she pleases, anytime, anywhere, anyhow. All of us have the right to free will. She needs not explain herself. She is still going to be on her forum from what I gather so I don't really see the big deal anyways.
there is no "big deal". I only saw people expressing their thoughts on Qs's presence, and more specificly, replying to the idea that we should be happy to see her leave (A concept she introduced in her post...albeit in a joking manner). Its natural for people to reply to QS in the way they did, given the concept/idea being responded to. Not trying to infringe on her rights for self determination. But thanks for the perspective, it is true, even expressing ones feelings or thoughts can be in a way an attempt to impose limitations if one chooses to view it from that perspective. I suppose if one wants to stretch it, and look for that, RM saying dont go could be misinterpreted to fit your perception. But having seen some of the past, posting here, i saw it more as her honest reaction to the prospect; despite some past friction, she recognizes the value of what QS is and shares. I dont see any of that as negative. Then again, "Seeing" is often the issue. As is the internal dialogue...so who knows what we see