08-15-2008, 12:00 AM
I know that is supposed to be enlightenment, but it goes against civilization. I really don't think that freedom and society are compatible. The worst
thing about nagualism is that it eventually starts forcing freedom on you. You go into it, just wanting a simple peek behind the curtain, and the next thing
you know, you're getting all your preconceptions about reality thrown out the window. It's not fair I tell you!
Civilization, at this evolutionary point, is not a creation of the spirit, so yes... freedom is against society. Society may very well be the
field were the flyers "grow" their food.
Nagualism is a path to freedom... if you don't want freedom.... well... what can I say? If you don't want to loose your lower self it will be a growing
issue to a point of conflict and death-end.
Society must be, at most, a field to exercise controlled folly. You can't be a working nagual with a very attached tonal resisting it.
At least for you there is conflict. For the old seers, I presume, it wasn't an issue. They wanted power for morbid things... they got it.
thing about nagualism is that it eventually starts forcing freedom on you. You go into it, just wanting a simple peek behind the curtain, and the next thing
you know, you're getting all your preconceptions about reality thrown out the window. It's not fair I tell you!
Civilization, at this evolutionary point, is not a creation of the spirit, so yes... freedom is against society. Society may very well be the
field were the flyers "grow" their food.
Nagualism is a path to freedom... if you don't want freedom.... well... what can I say? If you don't want to loose your lower self it will be a growing
issue to a point of conflict and death-end.
Society must be, at most, a field to exercise controlled folly. You can't be a working nagual with a very attached tonal resisting it.
At least for you there is conflict. For the old seers, I presume, it wasn't an issue. They wanted power for morbid things... they got it.