02-04-2011, 12:01 AM
Here are the comments I was responding to (not quite sure how to make someone else's comments show up in my comment with the vertical lines alongside them )
Lex:
Wow, I tell you. Trying to get people to talk about this no
object perspective of DJ’s is not easy. It’s like pulling teeth. From
the replies in this thread it seems people would rather talk about
anything else, especially the unknown. I have patiently tried to keep
bringing this back but now the deflections are mounting so fast that
trying to recover DJ’s subtle perspective concerning this requires a
different tact.
Now this is where the difficulty lies. People see
the unknowable all the time they just do not recognize it. Then there
are those who are spiritually sensitive and have made great headway in
their journey adroitly distinguishing between the known and the unknown
but for them the unknowable seems like some mystery hidden behind the
scenes a mystery that they guess is at the core of everything and then
they start building the “monumental edifices” of speculation concerning
this so called mystery. In the end these spiritually sensitive ones are
just as unable as those who nothing of the unknown when it comes to the
unknowable. The spiritually sensitive ones do not know how to separate
the unknowable from the unknown.
So I will shelve the topic for now. I will find a way to come back to it.
What
seems to be of interest is what is swirling in the deflections. When I
brought up the unknowable and this subtle distinction of DJ’s concerning
new and old seers there seemed to be a mild scrambling to seize the
narrative concerning this subtle distinction of DJ’s and steer that
narrative into something more inline with how people imagine themselves
as new seers and away from DJ’s view about the old seers, to steer the
narrative into something more comfortable.
So we can leave the
unknowable and no objects alone for the time being and focus on these
other issues instead. I just want it noted that that is what we appear
to be doing.
Probably intent has a hand in this, so let’s see where it goes.
Lex:
Wow, I tell you. Trying to get people to talk about this no
object perspective of DJ’s is not easy. It’s like pulling teeth. From
the replies in this thread it seems people would rather talk about
anything else, especially the unknown. I have patiently tried to keep
bringing this back but now the deflections are mounting so fast that
trying to recover DJ’s subtle perspective concerning this requires a
different tact.
Now this is where the difficulty lies. People see
the unknowable all the time they just do not recognize it. Then there
are those who are spiritually sensitive and have made great headway in
their journey adroitly distinguishing between the known and the unknown
but for them the unknowable seems like some mystery hidden behind the
scenes a mystery that they guess is at the core of everything and then
they start building the “monumental edifices” of speculation concerning
this so called mystery. In the end these spiritually sensitive ones are
just as unable as those who nothing of the unknown when it comes to the
unknowable. The spiritually sensitive ones do not know how to separate
the unknowable from the unknown.
So I will shelve the topic for now. I will find a way to come back to it.
What
seems to be of interest is what is swirling in the deflections. When I
brought up the unknowable and this subtle distinction of DJ’s concerning
new and old seers there seemed to be a mild scrambling to seize the
narrative concerning this subtle distinction of DJ’s and steer that
narrative into something more inline with how people imagine themselves
as new seers and away from DJ’s view about the old seers, to steer the
narrative into something more comfortable.
So we can leave the
unknowable and no objects alone for the time being and focus on these
other issues instead. I just want it noted that that is what we appear
to be doing.
Probably intent has a hand in this, so let’s see where it goes.