02-21-2011, 12:02 AM
Enchantra wrote:
Bob, your post reminds me of this:
Syntax
A man staring at his equations
said that the universe had a beginning.
There had been an explosion, he said.
A bang of bangs, and the universe was born.
And it is expanding, he said.
He had even calculated the length of its life:
ten billion revolutions of the earth around the sun.
The entire globe cheered;
They found his calculations to be science.
None thought that by proposing that the universe began,
the man had merely mirrored the syntax of his mother tongue;
a syntax which demands beginnings, like birth,
and developments, like maturation,
and ends, like death, as statements of facts.
The universe began,
and it is getting old, the man assured us,
and it will die, like all things die,
like he himself died after confirming mathematically
the syntax of his mother tongue.
**************************
The Other Syntax
Did the universe really begin?
Is the theory of the big bang true?
These are not questions, though they sound like they are.
Is the syntax that requires beginnings, developments
and ends as statements of fact the only syntax that exists?
That's the real question.
There are other syntaxes.
There is one, for example, which demands that varieties
of intensity be taken as facts.
In that syntax nothing begins and nothing ends;
thus birth is not a clean, clear-cut event,
but a specific type of intensity,
and so is maturation, and so is death.
A man of that syntax, looking over his equations, finds that
he has calculated enough varieties of intensity
to say with authority
that the universe never began
and will never end,
but that it has gone, and is going now, and will go
through endless fluctuations of intensity.
That man could very well conclude that the universe itself
is the chariot of intensity
and that one can board it
to journey through changes without end.
He will conclude all that, and much more,
perhaps without ever realizing
that he is merely confirming
the syntax of his mother tongue.
***************************
From "The Active Side of Infinity" by Carlos Castaneda
Hi Enchantra,
Here is another "Syntax" concerning the Creation Myth and also the Big Bang Theory that most people don't consider.
What if it is not speaking of "time" at all, but by using the passage of time allegorically, it is really speaking of levels of manifestation of Spirit?
Then the closer to the "beginning" the more rarified the substance of all that is manifest.
Beyond the "beginning" would then be outside of time and space. Pure Consciousness. Spirit. Silence.
And that would mean that it is all here now, and still in the process of Creating.
A never ending fountain of Spirit being poured out into more and more dense receptacles of manifestation.
I would use the word "density" rather than intensity. We are in a plane where it and we have become so dense that we no longer see or hear.
And that is the goal. To begin to see and hear and begin our journey back to Spirit.
That is the Qabalah.
Bob, your post reminds me of this:
Syntax
A man staring at his equations
said that the universe had a beginning.
There had been an explosion, he said.
A bang of bangs, and the universe was born.
And it is expanding, he said.
He had even calculated the length of its life:
ten billion revolutions of the earth around the sun.
The entire globe cheered;
They found his calculations to be science.
None thought that by proposing that the universe began,
the man had merely mirrored the syntax of his mother tongue;
a syntax which demands beginnings, like birth,
and developments, like maturation,
and ends, like death, as statements of facts.
The universe began,
and it is getting old, the man assured us,
and it will die, like all things die,
like he himself died after confirming mathematically
the syntax of his mother tongue.
**************************
The Other Syntax
Did the universe really begin?
Is the theory of the big bang true?
These are not questions, though they sound like they are.
Is the syntax that requires beginnings, developments
and ends as statements of fact the only syntax that exists?
That's the real question.
There are other syntaxes.
There is one, for example, which demands that varieties
of intensity be taken as facts.
In that syntax nothing begins and nothing ends;
thus birth is not a clean, clear-cut event,
but a specific type of intensity,
and so is maturation, and so is death.
A man of that syntax, looking over his equations, finds that
he has calculated enough varieties of intensity
to say with authority
that the universe never began
and will never end,
but that it has gone, and is going now, and will go
through endless fluctuations of intensity.
That man could very well conclude that the universe itself
is the chariot of intensity
and that one can board it
to journey through changes without end.
He will conclude all that, and much more,
perhaps without ever realizing
that he is merely confirming
the syntax of his mother tongue.
***************************
From "The Active Side of Infinity" by Carlos Castaneda
Hi Enchantra,
Here is another "Syntax" concerning the Creation Myth and also the Big Bang Theory that most people don't consider.
What if it is not speaking of "time" at all, but by using the passage of time allegorically, it is really speaking of levels of manifestation of Spirit?
Then the closer to the "beginning" the more rarified the substance of all that is manifest.
Beyond the "beginning" would then be outside of time and space. Pure Consciousness. Spirit. Silence.
And that would mean that it is all here now, and still in the process of Creating.
A never ending fountain of Spirit being poured out into more and more dense receptacles of manifestation.
I would use the word "density" rather than intensity. We are in a plane where it and we have become so dense that we no longer see or hear.
And that is the goal. To begin to see and hear and begin our journey back to Spirit.
That is the Qabalah.