04-19-2011, 12:00 AM
I would just like to acknowledge that it appears Nemo was correct in pointing this out.
If you research what has been said by Carlos and DJ you will find the term for this forum is erroneous and would be confusing for those who will come. Thebeginning of the new seers cycle was about 500 years ago and ended with DJ's lineage We inherit a working living knowledge from both groups, directly becauseof the tenant. Maybe understanding this difference can be helpful to this thread. Nemo
The Seers of the New Era
"The old and the new seers represent two extreme positions facing the same challenge,the result of the adaptation of sorcerers to very concrete historical circumstances. Buttoday, times, have changed."By the Eagle's design, at least one of the lineages of new seers has been able to redirectits task. The last twenty-seven naguals of my line had tried to recover the fearless spirit ofthe old seers, while at the same time maintaining the sobriety of purpose of the new. Inthat way, we were able to gather enough energy to attempt a new and more balancedadaptation of the teachings."According to Don Juan, massive changes in energy are happening at the present time,which will inevitably cause the emergence of a new cycle of warriors. To differentiatethem from their predecessors, I have called them modern seers, or seers of the new era." Nemo
http://sorcery.yuku.com/topic/2918/New- ... ers?page=3
To which I responded....
I believe this is pure Castaneda, not sure DJ had anything to do with this remark, but that is just me. But in saying this, "To differentiate them from their predecessors" by predecessors is he referring to the old seers or the new seers or both. If so perhaps Nemo you can point out how they differ? Lex
I now believe I was wrong about this and that DJ had everything to do with this as I hope to show
Lex, That old trick of asking questions, that you know the answers to. Nemo
Nemo I sincerely did not know the answer to the question I posed to you but now I see that was indeed the right question to ask! As we shall see here.
If you research what has been said by Carlos and DJ you will find the term for this forum is erroneous and would be confusing for those who will come. Thebeginning of the new seers cycle was about 500 years ago and ended with DJ's lineage We inherit a working living knowledge from both groups, directly becauseof the tenant. Maybe understanding this difference can be helpful to this thread. Nemo
The Seers of the New Era
"The old and the new seers represent two extreme positions facing the same challenge,the result of the adaptation of sorcerers to very concrete historical circumstances. Buttoday, times, have changed."By the Eagle's design, at least one of the lineages of new seers has been able to redirectits task. The last twenty-seven naguals of my line had tried to recover the fearless spirit ofthe old seers, while at the same time maintaining the sobriety of purpose of the new. Inthat way, we were able to gather enough energy to attempt a new and more balancedadaptation of the teachings."According to Don Juan, massive changes in energy are happening at the present time,which will inevitably cause the emergence of a new cycle of warriors. To differentiatethem from their predecessors, I have called them modern seers, or seers of the new era." Nemo
http://sorcery.yuku.com/topic/2918/New- ... ers?page=3
To which I responded....
I believe this is pure Castaneda, not sure DJ had anything to do with this remark, but that is just me. But in saying this, "To differentiate them from their predecessors" by predecessors is he referring to the old seers or the new seers or both. If so perhaps Nemo you can point out how they differ? Lex
I now believe I was wrong about this and that DJ had everything to do with this as I hope to show
Lex, That old trick of asking questions, that you know the answers to. Nemo
Nemo I sincerely did not know the answer to the question I posed to you but now I see that was indeed the right question to ask! As we shall see here.