08-04-2018, 12:00 AM
Dok from what I gather you and I are using different words with the same definitions that's all.
As I said knowledge, awareness, perception are subject to change. We can definitely change the descriptions of the what we perceive in any way we want. That doesn't make one thing less true than another it just makes it another potential description and assemblage position.
One can stay fixated in that one position or be fluid.
We're free to traverse the unknown, find, and learn new assemblage positions and realities.
Here's a certainty our (assemblage) points are holding a lot of knowledge (I call it knowledge Dok calls it inventory) right now for example about DJ and CCs descriptions of the world. We're free to play with it that's the cool part. Do we put it to the test and find out for ourselves? Do we discard it? Do we assume it's all valid? Do we blindly believe in it? Do we become monks or get on the FBIs most wanted list?
"Unless we do the right things. The right things won't happen."
As I said knowledge, awareness, perception are subject to change. We can definitely change the descriptions of the what we perceive in any way we want. That doesn't make one thing less true than another it just makes it another potential description and assemblage position.
One can stay fixated in that one position or be fluid.
We're free to traverse the unknown, find, and learn new assemblage positions and realities.
Here's a certainty our (assemblage) points are holding a lot of knowledge (I call it knowledge Dok calls it inventory) right now for example about DJ and CCs descriptions of the world. We're free to play with it that's the cool part. Do we put it to the test and find out for ourselves? Do we discard it? Do we assume it's all valid? Do we blindly believe in it? Do we become monks or get on the FBIs most wanted list?
"Unless we do the right things. The right things won't happen."