08-06-2018, 12:01 AM
The question I asked required a simple yes or no answer. I was going to show you and dumb it down for you even more. I no longer have the desire to do so as I am tired of repeating myself.
Right now you're clinging to your belief that even if I was aware, present, and made the choice to eat what I did, and knew the source from which it came since its homegrown I still don't know what I ate. Just look at how ridiculous it is from the side. Can you? Are you flexible enough to do that? Or are you blinded by something heavy and big? A monster with a thousand heads!
Also you're straying far from Dok's description of "to know" as well as you're trying to prove the validity of information with "to know" while his definition is that it is to act and it is power and it's not explained with words and its claimed through action. That's why he separated his description of to know with inventory and information. The only misunderstanding for me was why would you still use to know to express the possession of information since it's something entirely different.
If you want to play this game prove me that I did not eat what I ate this morning. I'm not discarding the possibility of me being insane and making up what I ate and that my memory can be totally screwing with me right now but give me one good reason why I shouldn't have the confidence to say I know what I ate a few hours ago. Please!
There's so many definitions of the word know in here right now that it's ridiculous.
Right now you're clinging to your belief that even if I was aware, present, and made the choice to eat what I did, and knew the source from which it came since its homegrown I still don't know what I ate. Just look at how ridiculous it is from the side. Can you? Are you flexible enough to do that? Or are you blinded by something heavy and big? A monster with a thousand heads!
Also you're straying far from Dok's description of "to know" as well as you're trying to prove the validity of information with "to know" while his definition is that it is to act and it is power and it's not explained with words and its claimed through action. That's why he separated his description of to know with inventory and information. The only misunderstanding for me was why would you still use to know to express the possession of information since it's something entirely different.
If you want to play this game prove me that I did not eat what I ate this morning. I'm not discarding the possibility of me being insane and making up what I ate and that my memory can be totally screwing with me right now but give me one good reason why I shouldn't have the confidence to say I know what I ate a few hours ago. Please!
There's so many definitions of the word know in here right now that it's ridiculous.