12-13-2017, 12:00 AM
glance left wrote:
"You wouldn't be the first to try that, but you may find to your surprise that once it's all over with and down on paper no one understands it but you"
Yeah, we've seen plenty of that around. But, in the interest of sharing one's experiences and having to use description in that attempt....why not?
My whole issue is when seers become fixated on their seeing and try to solidify it/institute it, stating "this is the way things are....period. Now everyone follow me because I know what's what!" That, to me, is the essence of what DJ described as "Clarity becoming the enemy of the man of knowledge".
It's a mystery. It's a proper mystery. We have schools of thought and whole universities and research labs just because apparently the world WANTS US TO KNOW IT. It just WANTS US to share our results and build grand systems.
"You wouldn't be the first to try that, but you may find to your surprise that once it's all over with and down on paper no one understands it but you"
Yeah, we've seen plenty of that around. But, in the interest of sharing one's experiences and having to use description in that attempt....why not?
My whole issue is when seers become fixated on their seeing and try to solidify it/institute it, stating "this is the way things are....period. Now everyone follow me because I know what's what!" That, to me, is the essence of what DJ described as "Clarity becoming the enemy of the man of knowledge".
It's a mystery. It's a proper mystery. We have schools of thought and whole universities and research labs just because apparently the world WANTS US TO KNOW IT. It just WANTS US to share our results and build grand systems.