07-11-2013, 12:00 AM
The foundations of the habitual assemblage point run very deep
they go back further than the oldest beings alive and into tradition and hierarchy.
we are born into a world which is essentially a series of sexual DIODES (one way valves)
The KNOWN or the male sexual energy is predominantly programmed to penetrate
but before intial sexual penetration occurs the male has no concept of WITHDRAWEL either..
here is a massive problem.. im sure that every teenage boy has encountered it on that special day their sex life begins.
they have dreamed of the day they could put it into the unknown..
likewise the female UNKNOWN in all its empty silence has no clue as to how to reject foreign fibres before it has experienced foreign fibre hosting.
It is important to discuss the nature of tantra i think..
especially..
Consensuality.
the problem i am hinting at is that although a single beings first experience with the opposite sex can be desribed as an utterly individual threshold to cross.
the sexual act itself is so ingrained with institutionalised sexual procedure perpetuated by billions
that the second motion of sex i.e. the withdrawel /or ejection.. is not a great threshold of freedom like penetration was..
but is more in the style of a 30kg lead weight attatched to/inserted into the genitals and immpossible to undo!
ThE KNOWN once activated is not easily undone.
they go back further than the oldest beings alive and into tradition and hierarchy.
we are born into a world which is essentially a series of sexual DIODES (one way valves)
The KNOWN or the male sexual energy is predominantly programmed to penetrate
but before intial sexual penetration occurs the male has no concept of WITHDRAWEL either..
here is a massive problem.. im sure that every teenage boy has encountered it on that special day their sex life begins.
they have dreamed of the day they could put it into the unknown..
likewise the female UNKNOWN in all its empty silence has no clue as to how to reject foreign fibres before it has experienced foreign fibre hosting.
It is important to discuss the nature of tantra i think..
especially..
Consensuality.
the problem i am hinting at is that although a single beings first experience with the opposite sex can be desribed as an utterly individual threshold to cross.
the sexual act itself is so ingrained with institutionalised sexual procedure perpetuated by billions
that the second motion of sex i.e. the withdrawel /or ejection.. is not a great threshold of freedom like penetration was..
but is more in the style of a 30kg lead weight attatched to/inserted into the genitals and immpossible to undo!
ThE KNOWN once activated is not easily undone.