07-12-2013, 12:00 AM
RG;
“The foundations of the habitual
assemblage point run very deep
they go back further than the oldest
beings alive and into tradition and hierarchy.“
////////////////
Yes, I see the truth of that. Personal
karma is compounded by family and even a society's karma. False and
limiting beliefs are passed on through the generations, and rarely
are they questioned. So it is with states of consciousness,
especially given the negative influences of modern mass media.
/////////////////
What you said about the socially
programmed role of the sexes is quite interesting. As you implied,
some of our male and female behavior is also genetic. I suspect that
the norms of history and pre-history have become ingrained in our
DNA, and as any student of history knows, the human past is saturated
with ill-intent.
///////////////////
This of course brings us to the fact
that very little of our past as a species, has been based upon
consensual agreement. Even in the modern day where it is assumed that
we are so “liberated” in our beliefs and social mores, sexual
role-playing, obligation and rigid beliefs still govern the norm.
This is definitely NOT an enlightened world society in which we live,
it would rightfully be called “the Neo-Dark Age” where both male
and female are disempowered into inhibited smallness, that is defined
for them by religion, education, social karma and the mass media.
//////////////////////////
I fully agree that tantra is a long
overdue subject for discussion. The first thing that seems
necessary, is to challenge utterly the role-playing norms of the
yin/yang, to free their energies from these artificial and
disempowering norms. A return to the natural is called for, but
through the cultivation of enlightened minds that question, and who
have the personal power to be progressive with each other. When men
and women have the personal power to guide themselves effectively,
they will then also have the power to guide each other into higher
levels of bliss and mutual strengthening; don't you agree?
////////////////////////
Messenger, you said;
“We could say sexual energy is the
same as dreaming energy ,
That the river of being upon floats a
seed .
That the seed misuse causes a river of misuse “
///////////////
I'd say that you're right, but also
that sexual energy is the foundation of EVERYTHING the body does. To
strengthen it is to strengthen all of it's activities, including
those of the mind. The misuse of sex, or should I say, sexual intent
that is destructive/unnatural/non-evolutionary certainly does result
in a weakeningof the body, not to mention other bodies. The modern
world needs desperately to purify sexual intention in general, to get
away from this norm of mutual resentment and violent aggression to a
position of innate joy, natural sensitivity and consensual benefit.
“The foundations of the habitual
assemblage point run very deep
they go back further than the oldest
beings alive and into tradition and hierarchy.“
////////////////
Yes, I see the truth of that. Personal
karma is compounded by family and even a society's karma. False and
limiting beliefs are passed on through the generations, and rarely
are they questioned. So it is with states of consciousness,
especially given the negative influences of modern mass media.
/////////////////
What you said about the socially
programmed role of the sexes is quite interesting. As you implied,
some of our male and female behavior is also genetic. I suspect that
the norms of history and pre-history have become ingrained in our
DNA, and as any student of history knows, the human past is saturated
with ill-intent.
///////////////////
This of course brings us to the fact
that very little of our past as a species, has been based upon
consensual agreement. Even in the modern day where it is assumed that
we are so “liberated” in our beliefs and social mores, sexual
role-playing, obligation and rigid beliefs still govern the norm.
This is definitely NOT an enlightened world society in which we live,
it would rightfully be called “the Neo-Dark Age” where both male
and female are disempowered into inhibited smallness, that is defined
for them by religion, education, social karma and the mass media.
//////////////////////////
I fully agree that tantra is a long
overdue subject for discussion. The first thing that seems
necessary, is to challenge utterly the role-playing norms of the
yin/yang, to free their energies from these artificial and
disempowering norms. A return to the natural is called for, but
through the cultivation of enlightened minds that question, and who
have the personal power to be progressive with each other. When men
and women have the personal power to guide themselves effectively,
they will then also have the power to guide each other into higher
levels of bliss and mutual strengthening; don't you agree?
////////////////////////
Messenger, you said;
“We could say sexual energy is the
same as dreaming energy ,
That the river of being upon floats a
seed .
That the seed misuse causes a river of misuse “
///////////////
I'd say that you're right, but also
that sexual energy is the foundation of EVERYTHING the body does. To
strengthen it is to strengthen all of it's activities, including
those of the mind. The misuse of sex, or should I say, sexual intent
that is destructive/unnatural/non-evolutionary certainly does result
in a weakeningof the body, not to mention other bodies. The modern
world needs desperately to purify sexual intention in general, to get
away from this norm of mutual resentment and violent aggression to a
position of innate joy, natural sensitivity and consensual benefit.