03-14-2011, 12:00 AM
Nu Lang wrote:Hey En I just read your post #24 here. I hope by my saying this I can clarify once and for all where you are not connecting to what I've been saying..you said...
"I think I am being obstinate here in that I do not agree that when we watch someone's actions in order to help them 'see' the err of their ways, "I never said that. It has nothing to do with err of their ways. Many, including Dreamways will point out negatives (errs) whether they be true or not, in others. I'm not interested in regular stalking of people, not really. I will sometimes engage people who are doing it to others, but they will have initiated it usually, as Dreamways did. He was trying to show me the err of my ways, for example.
I am saying... stalking... can be used to help someone see.
It's not that I don't understand. It is that I do not agree with this interpretation of stalking.
If you are not stalking someone to help them out of a negative (error) then what are you helping them see? Are you helping them see something about themself? I assume it is a negative pattern, that they wish to be free from.
What is 'regular' stalking of people, and what is the kind that you do (irregular)? As I said before this is a new definition to me. I wish I could agree with you here.
If you are saying that staking like some do on internet forums is engaging the double to shift someone else, that sounds good one paper. I can see how that would be considered a type of stalking. But I don't think that disagreeing where you feel the person is incorrect and attempting to show them or help them see what you see, is using your double to shift them. (Maybe in a small percentage of cases.)
"I think I am being obstinate here in that I do not agree that when we watch someone's actions in order to help them 'see' the err of their ways, "I never said that. It has nothing to do with err of their ways. Many, including Dreamways will point out negatives (errs) whether they be true or not, in others. I'm not interested in regular stalking of people, not really. I will sometimes engage people who are doing it to others, but they will have initiated it usually, as Dreamways did. He was trying to show me the err of my ways, for example.
I am saying... stalking... can be used to help someone see.
It's not that I don't understand. It is that I do not agree with this interpretation of stalking.
If you are not stalking someone to help them out of a negative (error) then what are you helping them see? Are you helping them see something about themself? I assume it is a negative pattern, that they wish to be free from.
What is 'regular' stalking of people, and what is the kind that you do (irregular)? As I said before this is a new definition to me. I wish I could agree with you here.
If you are saying that staking like some do on internet forums is engaging the double to shift someone else, that sounds good one paper. I can see how that would be considered a type of stalking. But I don't think that disagreeing where you feel the person is incorrect and attempting to show them or help them see what you see, is using your double to shift them. (Maybe in a small percentage of cases.)