03-14-2011, 12:00 AM
trying to play catch-up here....
nu lang, i understand that you have your opinion about the ways and means of stalking. i was never trying to say that you are wrong and i am right.... i was trying to point out that there are obviously two major points of view on the subject, and so when you (or anyone) speaks about stalking, you cannot take for granted that the person on the receiving end of that discussion is in agreement and will relate to your terms. i still don't agree with your definition, but we don't have to agree, so it doesn't matter. i am being obstinate, but it was because you were missing my meanings.
what i said in RF was something pertinent to the conversation in RF and ought to have been left there, but since you bring it up, what i said was that we could fool ourselves into thinking we were helping people out of their boxes, but "isn't like that the saddest ego trip you could possibly take?" i never said you. i mean, "you" as in me, you, anyone. replace with "an individual". i still feel that way. but i also clearly said "it's just my opinion, and i would never expect anyone to agree or even care about it." if you want to dissect it, the reason i feel that way is pretty simple - if you look at someone and think to yourself that maybe just maybe you make them a better person with some thought out stalking, you are sitting in judgement of that person and what is judging them and calling the shots is the ego. the glasses you are viewing them through are colored by your ego. unless you have lost your ego, you are not in a position to see clearly or make those calls because you are just as much bogged down with your own **** as that person is with his. and, just so we're clear here, when i say "you" - i mean anyone.
nu lang, i understand that you have your opinion about the ways and means of stalking. i was never trying to say that you are wrong and i am right.... i was trying to point out that there are obviously two major points of view on the subject, and so when you (or anyone) speaks about stalking, you cannot take for granted that the person on the receiving end of that discussion is in agreement and will relate to your terms. i still don't agree with your definition, but we don't have to agree, so it doesn't matter. i am being obstinate, but it was because you were missing my meanings.
what i said in RF was something pertinent to the conversation in RF and ought to have been left there, but since you bring it up, what i said was that we could fool ourselves into thinking we were helping people out of their boxes, but "isn't like that the saddest ego trip you could possibly take?" i never said you. i mean, "you" as in me, you, anyone. replace with "an individual". i still feel that way. but i also clearly said "it's just my opinion, and i would never expect anyone to agree or even care about it." if you want to dissect it, the reason i feel that way is pretty simple - if you look at someone and think to yourself that maybe just maybe you make them a better person with some thought out stalking, you are sitting in judgement of that person and what is judging them and calling the shots is the ego. the glasses you are viewing them through are colored by your ego. unless you have lost your ego, you are not in a position to see clearly or make those calls because you are just as much bogged down with your own **** as that person is with his. and, just so we're clear here, when i say "you" - i mean anyone.