04-02-2011, 12:00 AM
Sedna wrote:
You are welcome, and here are some more.
You state that you can easily see the true nature or core of a person. However, what it is that you respond to (provoke) is their invented self while ignoring their true self. On some level you must see that love begets love and invented self begets more invented self. My question, although you have already answered it, is WHAT you choose to call out of others?
A seer also sees when a bullshit artist is playing games of semantics and NLP. Sorry sorry, love me, love me.
The other issue I have with your description is your stating that one IS a tyrant when you also say that one IS love. If one IS love then one cannot also be a tyrant, so you may need to choose words that more clearly describe what it is that you are trying to communicate.
IF you knew anything about sorcery, you would know the concept of dualty - not dualism, but duality. The reality of it is this: two things may exist simultaneously without either threatening the sovereignty of the other. Yin and yang - a piece of each wihin the other. I can love someone unconditionally and not like them in the least. So you may want to consider more carefully what YOU are trying to communicate. Or are you trying to communicate at all, or only cloud the issue?
I agree, in the tonal, one can go about one invented self to another invented self...you made quite a game of it with your MIL. However, my questions concern what might happen if you WERE your true self, if you WERE love, with your MIL how differently those interactions might be. It can be confusing trying to distinguish between your beliefs and values and who you ARE.
Yes, you are living proof of that, my old friend. *winks* Nothing has changed with you. Nothing ever will. That is who you ARE.
However, if who you ARE is an expression of love then anything that is anything other than an expression of love is not you.
Incorrect. I'm not going to waste anymore time trying to explain to you why or how it works, because clearly you are only here to muddy the waters and play the same old games you've been playing for years. I had "indulged" you briefly for the purpose of drawing you out, but this is going nowhere.
It can also be difficult to distinguish or discern the various loves one has from the love they are, this is why I asked you as an expression of your true self, the expression of love you ARE, what you would express to her...however, you couldn't answer this.
I answered it. You simply didn't like the answer - which, of course is not my problem, but yours.
Consider carefully, what one really IS?
I have. Have you? (Please -don't answer that. If you were authentic, you wouldn't be hiding behind yet one more avatar, pretending... preteding...)
You are welcome, and here are some more.
You state that you can easily see the true nature or core of a person. However, what it is that you respond to (provoke) is their invented self while ignoring their true self. On some level you must see that love begets love and invented self begets more invented self. My question, although you have already answered it, is WHAT you choose to call out of others?
A seer also sees when a bullshit artist is playing games of semantics and NLP. Sorry sorry, love me, love me.
The other issue I have with your description is your stating that one IS a tyrant when you also say that one IS love. If one IS love then one cannot also be a tyrant, so you may need to choose words that more clearly describe what it is that you are trying to communicate.
IF you knew anything about sorcery, you would know the concept of dualty - not dualism, but duality. The reality of it is this: two things may exist simultaneously without either threatening the sovereignty of the other. Yin and yang - a piece of each wihin the other. I can love someone unconditionally and not like them in the least. So you may want to consider more carefully what YOU are trying to communicate. Or are you trying to communicate at all, or only cloud the issue?
I agree, in the tonal, one can go about one invented self to another invented self...you made quite a game of it with your MIL. However, my questions concern what might happen if you WERE your true self, if you WERE love, with your MIL how differently those interactions might be. It can be confusing trying to distinguish between your beliefs and values and who you ARE.
Yes, you are living proof of that, my old friend. *winks* Nothing has changed with you. Nothing ever will. That is who you ARE.
However, if who you ARE is an expression of love then anything that is anything other than an expression of love is not you.
Incorrect. I'm not going to waste anymore time trying to explain to you why or how it works, because clearly you are only here to muddy the waters and play the same old games you've been playing for years. I had "indulged" you briefly for the purpose of drawing you out, but this is going nowhere.
It can also be difficult to distinguish or discern the various loves one has from the love they are, this is why I asked you as an expression of your true self, the expression of love you ARE, what you would express to her...however, you couldn't answer this.
I answered it. You simply didn't like the answer - which, of course is not my problem, but yours.
Consider carefully, what one really IS?
I have. Have you? (Please -don't answer that. If you were authentic, you wouldn't be hiding behind yet one more avatar, pretending... preteding...)