10-19-2010, 12:00 AM
I think you miss the point. If you eliminate the phrase you reacted to, it reads thus:
It also shows that what we view from our perspective as "negative" events, thoughts or emotions are all merely a part of the Loosh spectrum of radiation, and exalting the virtues of the perceived "positive" forms over the "negative" ones is wholly redundant. Suppressing "negative" feelings actually runs contrary to the design.
In other words, the production of Loosh, perhaps our primary reason for existing in human form, comes primarily from conflict, not from love and light, which would explain the popularity of war, for example, to date our most dramatic and fascinating invention.
It also shows that what we view from our perspective as "negative" events, thoughts or emotions are all merely a part of the Loosh spectrum of radiation, and exalting the virtues of the perceived "positive" forms over the "negative" ones is wholly redundant. Suppressing "negative" feelings actually runs contrary to the design.
In other words, the production of Loosh, perhaps our primary reason for existing in human form, comes primarily from conflict, not from love and light, which would explain the popularity of war, for example, to date our most dramatic and fascinating invention.