Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Even in distant positions of dreaming I always have a sense of what is taking place. I know within me the new laws of the dream, my new abilities, what gist of what is taking place. I see it as something feeding you the conscious awareness you need. When I see in a dream it is the essence of what is there that I see. It tells me the knowledge of what is taking place. I agree, Little paw that it is understandable and natural for the mind to come to the wrong conclusion at times however. Ideally though I prefer to rely on the silent knowledge to guide me or my seeing.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
serloco wrote:No, its just a synchronicity, not much too it really.
Every position of reality has its own reasoning that goes along with it, so long as you are not clinging to the attachment to that position of reasoning then you are fine. However if your reasoning is sound and you can see then it is correct reasoning and nothing to worry about.I disagree, not all experiences can be reasoned and trying to do so apart from being inaccurate can actually be dangerous. I have literally seen my life flash before my eyes once, not sure how close I was to death but I was very afraid and it all had something to do with trying to understand what I was seeing.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Littlepaw wrote:
serloco wrote:No, its just a synchronicity, not much too it really.
Every position of reality has its own reasoning that goes along with it, so long as you are not clinging to the attachment to that position of reasoning then you are fine. However if your reasoning is sound and you can see then it is correct reasoning and nothing to worry about.
I disagree, not all experiences can be reasoned and trying to do so apart from being inaccurate can actually be dangerous. I have literally seen my life flash before my eyes once, not sure how close I was to death but I was very afraid and it all had something to do with trying to understand what I was seeing.
It is my understanding that the truth of what is occurring is always there to see. It may not make sense to your standard position of awareness as the reasoning within that position is obsolete, however the new position should have its own reasoning. The old seers held the position of awareness that was firmly on the silent knowledge, that could see the perfect position of reasoning, they could see the reasoning of any position of awareness. I see it as universal truths.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Even in distant positions of dreaming I always have a sense of what is taking place. I know within me the new laws of the dream, my new abilities, what gist of what is taking place. I see it as something feeding you the conscious awareness you need. When I see in a dream it is the essence of what is there that I see. It tells me the knowledge of what is taking place. I agree, Little paw that it is understandable and natural for the mind to come to the wrong conclusion at times however. Ideally though I prefer to rely on the silent knowledge to guide me or my seeing.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
"It is my understanding that the truth of what is occurring is always there to see. It may not make sense to your standard position of awareness as the reasoning within that position is obsolete, however the new position should have its own reasoning. The old seers held the position of awareness that was firmly on the silent knowledge, that could see the perfect position of reasoning, they could see the reasoning of any position of awareness. I see it as universal truths."
i love this expression of it..ty serloco
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
I think that there are two types of knowledge, irrational and rational. How can you reason about irrational knowledge?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
if feel it has its own type of glossary Little Paw, not to be reflected on or analysed..it just is, what it is....it doesnt trigger any response it is just 'accepted' as being...
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Sorry Shamanka I am not sure what you mean, what has its own type of glossary? I am pointing out that there is left side awareness and right side awareness. Also that left side awareness cannot be grasped by the rational mind or reason. If someone sais something like every position of reality has it own reasoning I will say how can it?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
The known and the unknown sides of awareness may be opposing, but the unknown is still knowable, meaning that we can and do become aware of it, and quite naturally any awareness that was previously unknown becomes known to us, including the reasoning that lies within it. It seems you are speaking of the unknowable in which case no known reasoning would apply.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Because you can question it.
Left side of awareness same as right has nothing to do with rationality or irrationality, rather than that it has much more to do with access to different states of awareness.
Every single step or word you make is a change of reality.
Can you please explain what does irrationality means ? Because for me everyone has different meaning of these, for someone would be irrational to catch fishes when he can read books all day and vice versa. If you are describing some sort of commonly used rationality, then I would love to know from which group this idea came from.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
How do you know you cant reason in unknowable ?
Or did you ment that you would have to use unknown reasoning ?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
I don`t personally know anything about the unknowable so how can i from reasoning based on unknown variables
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Even in alternate states of awareness there is reasoning, it is just altered reasoning. The habitual reasoning is no longer active however there are new laws and ways of alignment, new variables. New reasoning becomes activated.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
"It is my understanding that the truth of what is occurring is always there to see. It may not make sense to your standard position of awareness as the reasoning within that position is obsolete, however the new position should have its own reasoning. The old seers held the position of awareness that was firmly on the silent knowledge, that could see the perfect position of reasoning, they could see the reasoning of any position of awareness. I see it as universal truths."
i love this expression of it..ty serloco
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
I think that there are two types of knowledge, irrational and rational. How can you reason about irrational knowledge?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
if feel it has its own type of glossary Little Paw, not to be reflected on or analysed..it just is, what it is....it doesnt trigger any response it is just 'accepted' as being...
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Sorry Shamanka I am not sure what you mean, what has its own type of glossary? I am pointing out that there is left side awareness and right side awareness. Also that left side awareness cannot be grasped by the rational mind or reason. If someone sais something like every position of reality has it own reasoning I will say how can it?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
The known and the unknown sides of awareness may be opposing, but the unknown is still knowable, meaning that we can and do become aware of it, and quite naturally any awareness that was previously unknown becomes known to us, including the reasoning that lies within it. It seems you are speaking of the unknowable in which case no known reasoning would apply.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Because you can question it.
Left side of awareness same as right has nothing to do with rationality or irrationality, rather than that it has much more to do with access to different states of awareness.
Every single step or word you make is a change of reality.
Can you please explain what does irrationality means ? Because for me everyone has different meaning of these, for someone would be irrational to catch fishes when he can read books all day and vice versa. If you are describing some sort of commonly used rationality, then I would love to know from which group this idea came from.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
How do you know you cant reason in unknowable ?
Or did you ment that you would have to use unknown reasoning ?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
I don`t personally know anything about the unknowable so how can i from reasoning based on unknown variables
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Even in alternate states of awareness there is reasoning, it is just altered reasoning. The habitual reasoning is no longer active however there are new laws and ways of alignment, new variables. New reasoning becomes activated.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
"It is my understanding that the truth of what is occurring is always there to see. It may not make sense to your standard position of awareness as the reasoning within that position is obsolete, however the new position should have its own reasoning. The old seers held the position of awareness that was firmly on the silent knowledge, that could see the perfect position of reasoning, they could see the reasoning of any position of awareness. I see it as universal truths."
i love this expression of it..ty serloco
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
I think that there are two types of knowledge, irrational and rational. How can you reason about irrational knowledge?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
if feel it has its own type of glossary Little Paw, not to be reflected on or analysed..it just is, what it is....it doesnt trigger any response it is just 'accepted' as being...
|
