The Eye of Knowledge

[serloco]

It takes a lil bit of practice, but in time the awareness needed to develop the eye of knowledge is gained and you can see it clearly. Knowledge is power, but the wrong kind can be disastrous. Take for example the knowledge that every human must die and catch ill. The knowledge that everyone must grow old. Its these lil tidbits of knowledge we collect as we grow that put all the pieces together and sets our intent. Knowledge can be a great thing too. For example "what doesnt kill us makes us stronger". A piece of knowledge that gives us power for going thru our hardships. When applied can do great things for our power and will. 

Knowledge however, as many do not know, is a choice to apply and activate or discard and deactivate. Choice must be exercised all through out our lives when handling knowledge. Knowledge may not only be found and hunted but also created yourself. Over time one develops the eye for it. When overhearing someone talk about their beliefs, and their ideas, you can see right into them and see what they intend for themselves and for their worlds around them. With the eye of knowledge you can see right into their tonals and see even how they might die. Death indeed is intended and thus met. Just like every piece of knowledge one applies to their lives is met. 

For myself I see that the average man is covered in ****. Weakness, and frailty. Illness is rampant in their vocabulary. They all talk about it and words beckon form and power to us. Words should be carefully considered when used. I never say "there is a cold going around and so I can catch one". I never apply myself to the common man. I stand apart, ready to make my own decisions and take my own road if need be. Even if I am the only one going there. I havent been sick in over 15 years now as result. I am not sure I can be sick anymore. My immune system is bolstered by knowledge that says otherwise. 

When you hear a piece of knowledge you must ask yourself, you must see it carefully, and see the consequences of having it active in your life. You must see the intent involved and ask yourself "do i want to intend that result?" "what goes around comes around" is an interesting piece of knowledge. So is "no good deed goes unpunished". Will you intend your good deeds get punished? Do you believe they will? Is it a choice to apply it or not? Who's choice is it? Its your of course. You practice what you preach.

[Le_Regard]

One thing I'm sure about is that in the world today there exists a class of people whose language is full to overflowing with the vocabulary of sickness, weakness, and frailty -- and these people are called doctors.

[Le_Regard]

Who are you talking to right now if you "stand apart, ready to make my own decisions and take my own road if need be. Even if I am the only one going there"?

[serloco]

I am sharing a piece of myself. I did say if need be. I am not a lemming. Nor am I a sheep. Many people are full of death, and their knowledge leads to disaster. I would not follow them anywhere. However the common man also has accumulated many treasures, gifts that can move us higher on our path. There you can count me in. However, as stated, if need be, I am ready to turn on a dime and head out on my own way. It takes one person to begin a new way. Often it takes a new idea, a new solution, or a new way of doing something to achieve something amazing.

[Le_Regard]

Nothing is very amazing when you are alone.

[Le_Regard]

By the way it's traditional for discourses on immortality to begin with a discussion of childbirth, etc., as this is the conventional form of immortality, accessible even to the animals and the dullest of men, etc., etc.

[serloco]

Le_Regard wrote:
Nothing is very amazing when you are alone.

Ya see, that is the reason for my post. The eye of knowledge. Reading you, your knowledge, I can see that being alone would be quite dull for you. I have been alone for ages and enjoy the moments of miracles and wonders purely on my own. Oh I have friends, good ones too. But I enjoy, very much so, time to myself alone. It is when I am alone that I can truly think on my own. No tv, no media, no social influences. Being alone is the birth place of original thinking.

[Le_Regard]

What language do you think to yourself in when you're alone?

[serloco]

Le_Regard wrote:
By the way it's traditional for discourses on immortality to begin with a discussion of childbirth, etc., as this is the conventional form of immortality, accessible even to the animals and the dullest of men, etc., etc.

Is that so? You DO seem to be an expert on nearly everything. If you could read between the lines I am sure you can find the idea of childbirth present. After all the knowledge that the common man attains is collected since birth and taught to us as we grow. Death, age, illness, are all things we have been taught and are all forms of traditional knowledge. Indeed, shedding the average forms of knowledge is key to attaining immortality. But since we are on the topic I can add to that further. Child birth, egg and sperm, is the beginning of life. The raw potential before it is formed. It is here where potential is at its fullest, and it here where we may begin again once we have shed all the **** we have been taught. Taking back, a form of recap of the knowledge and intents we have set leads us to freedom. A new life.

[serloco]

Le_Regard wrote:
What language do you think to yourself in when you're alone?

I think in primal tongue. A language of awareness and consciousness. A pure form. No language. Just ideas, and impulses, thoughts without dialogue. Pure spark of creativity.

[Le_Regard]

serloco wrote:
Le_Regard wrote:
What language do you think to yourself in when you're alone?

I think in primal tongue. A language of awareness and consciousness. A pure form. No language. Just ideas, and impulses, thoughts without dialogue. Pure spark of creativity. 

Have you ever considered that the primal tongue is easy, effortless really, and maybe speaking English to other human beings might actually be the greater challenge?

[Le_Regard]

Aristotle more or less said God was "Thought thinking Itself" by the way.

God is bodiless, thought is bodiless...

But what could be before God? Nothing, so... Thought thinking Itself.

[serloco]

Le_Regard wrote:
serloco wrote:


I think in primal tongue. A language of awareness and consciousness. A pure form. No language. Just ideas, and impulses, thoughts without dialogue. Pure spark of creativity. 

Have you ever considered that the primal tongue is easy, effortless really, and maybe speaking English to other human beings might actually be the greater challenge?

Actually it takes a heightened state of awareness to isolate it after years of social conditioning, being trained to speak and think in an internal dialogue. It takes more work to remove that dialogue. I find the pure awareness to be a beautiful thing. So fresh and direct. Tasty even. After all, why bother speaking to ourselves at all? Why use language? The question you posed was when I was alone right? Now you are speaking of relating to other human beings? Isnt that what we are doing now? 

I find even better then language is the pure and primal telepathic delivery. The ability to see and be seen, to project thought to another. Or the ability to move their position of awareness to one that can see you clearly. Words are slow, and although they do have their beauty and purpose, they are something that wont last forever within human evolution. Direct communication will be one day learned and taught by all.

[serloco]

Le_Regard wrote:
Aristotle more or less said God was "Thought thinking Itself" by the way.

God is bodiless, thought is bodiless...

But what could be before God? Nothing, so... Thought thinking Itself.

Sounds like "Schiz" -split "Phrenia" - Mind. A split mind. 

God can take and be any form. 

Have you ever heard of thought forms? Thought can indeed take form. Hallucinations, illusions, projections of consciousness. Perception even.

[Le_Regard]

serloco wrote:
[that wont evolution. Direct communication will be one day learned and taught by all. 

I suspect that if you tried this for real, the world would immediately end in flames.

[serloco]

Le_Regard wrote:
serloco wrote:
[that wont evolution. Direct communication will be one day learned and taught by all. 

I suspect that if you tried this for real, the world would immediately end in flames.

Oh I have been in worlds of pure telepathy. Inorganic beings are beings of pure awareness. They see your every thought and can see everyone else's as well. Of course they also take many forms and can pretend to be other things they are not, but ultimately they are pure. I lived in a world like that for many years. I have also spent countless hours in telepathic communication with many humans. Some of them even here have witnessed this in chat. And I dont know why you think the world would end in flames but it is an incredible experience. So intimate.

[Le_Regard]

serloco wrote:
Oh I have been in worlds of pure telepathy. Inorganic beings are beings of pure awareness. They see your every thought and can see everyone else's as well. Of course they also take many forms and can pretend to be other things they are not, but ultimately they are pure. I lived in a world like that for many years. I have also spent countless hours in telepathic communication with many humans. Some of them even here have witnessed this in chat. And I dont know why you think the world would end in flames but it is an incredible experience. So intimate. 

It does nevertheless still seem to me that if you were telepathically open to ALL beings, and not just a tiny set of SOME beings (maybe even ONE being) they wouldn't have to be in all these separate worlds and invisible to each other most of the time in the first place.

[Le_Regard]

There's also a whole book called The Fire From Within, right?

There's a fire. From within. I couldn't possibly just make something like that up.

[serloco]

Le_Regard wrote:
There's also a whole book called The Fire From Within, right?

There's a fire.  From within.  I couldn't possibly just make something like that up.

Yes but burning from within has nothing to do with telepathy activating it. Well maybe it could, but that seems like a long shot.

[Le_Regard]

serloco wrote:
Le_Regard wrote:
There's also a whole book called The Fire From Within, right?

There's a fire.  From within.  I couldn't possibly just make something like that up.

Yes but burning from within has nothing to do with telepathy activating it. Well maybe it could, but that seems like a long shot. 

Starting from the premise that everything we perceive is just the emanations of an Indescribable Force, the only way I can explain telepathy is... like a million people driving around a city in their cars, and they can't even see or hear each other but they're all potentially at least listening to the same radio station.

[Le_Regard]

If you were to somehow hack your radio to listen to all frequencies at once instead of one at a time I think that would set up a classic Burning From Within scenario.

[serloco]

So let me get this straight, you actually think over stimulation of sensory input causes freedom? If only it were that easy..

[Le_Regard]

SENSORY input?

[Le_Regard]

[Le_Regard]

Basically, this.  It all just analyzes down to this in the end.