Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Stalking America
#1
It's no secret I'm American; a proud American at that.  I stumbled upon a video about American forces that I found very inspiring.  Inspiration can also be found worldwide too so if you have a video to share I would love to see it.  When we talk about "being nagual" or "becoming a warrior" I ponder upon the meaning of warriorship.  The forgein installation is relevant to what is considered foreign.  For me, the middle east would be foreign.  To others, America might be foreign.  Perhaps there's a universal method of being a warrior, a method that isn't so structured in the ways Carlos has structured them.  A method to apply warrioship in any situation, even beyond Sorcery.  

Just sayin'.

What are we preaching?

I preach freedom.  There's a video for that xD

[url=
Reply
#2
the habitual assemblage point is a genus wide phenomenon.the science of warriorship is designed to tackle social conditioning
as it appears in the habitual as it appears in humans.

We are all hardwired into our nationalities to a certain extent
but this is social conditioning.

in a way as part of my own shedding of human form
i should by all rights be totally global in my concerns
with complete objectivity and sobriety over and beyond any nationalistic pride
or predjudice versus other nations.

It isnt quite so..

I settle myself with finding new layers of the cocoon
that make light of nationalism in a more zen balanced way.

for instance if i am to poke fun at another nation it will be intentionally harmless
and because it is harmless, and because the layers of the cocoon are relative to the hap
i can happily allow those layers to be empowered anywhere in the hap as it occurs genus wide
as i know that even in the hands of murdering scum.. my gift to the haps outer potential is not violent.

It is ludicrous for me to say i have a fluid assemblage point and yet have a nationalistic or racist attitude
ludicrous to say i am fluid yet be culturally conditioned.

the habitual assemblage point as it stands will be the death of the species unless it can be set into a SHIFT.

i hate those pictures of the earth where they say stuff like dehli is the third eye or australia is the penis 
of the world.
these ideas of geographic power points relative to the human energy system although linked to the collective
are not really very workable..
just as it is folly for many of the psy-ops programmes to keep hammering away at superiority
wether chinese, russian, america, , australian, british, german, italian, swiss.

no single nation can move the habitual assemblage point for us all
although individuals from any nation can escape the habitual assemblage point for themselves.

its very important that the tensions between different nations are understood within the process of time 
as they move toward potential.
we set our world apon a future and then be immpeccable within the intent.

hell i am not an american..
i can still say oo rah
and hang out with miley cyrus.. can't I?
Reply
#3
If I can still hang with Germany and Hitler in my dreams, I see no reason why you can't hang with Miley. Intelligence has no skin color.

As for the shifts, fluidity has enough space to accommodate ego and pride. Although, maybe I'm just being silly here. Consider this: those with true command over their consciousness have no limits. If there are no limits, couldn't there be a moment in time when an aware individual selects ego, nationalism, or pride? If those concepts (social conditioning) serve the objective, then avoiding embracing those would result in failure.

Delhi probably could be the third eye and Australia the massive dick of the planet. What harm is there to be have an ego? I know Carlos aims to move beyond these things to eliminate them, but Carlos seems to have missed a detail or two. Once a person moves beyond a trait, why not turn around and use that trait in appropriate situations? Perhaps the point isn't to eliminate, but control. If we eliminated all of these "lesser" traits of self, I'm unconvinced that's a desired global outcome. Now, control over the lesser traits seems far more useful. To simplify myself: I would rather have lots of options than to permanently eliminate all (or most) of my options. That's just me though, everyone lives their own beliefs. I know DokGreen preferred total elimination over control. To each their own. Do you prefer control or elimination, Rosy?
Reply
#4
no single nation can move the habitual assemblage point for us all
although individuals from any nation can escape the habitual assemblage point for themselves.
Reply
#5
Not one escapes the habitual assemblage point. Each new arrangement becomes the new habit. Even constant fluctuation becomes a habit. I prefer to think that though we all may be ignorant of self, there is always more to discover and there are always more to punish (or reward).
Reply
#6
Reply
#7
Reply
#8
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)