Feminism: the Stalk

[rosygyro]

i watched tommorowland todaywithin which this tachyon power antennae was broadcasting a frequency from another dimension
this frequency was fuelled a long time ago, the bridge between dimensions closed
and from the unreachable it was urging mankind to extinction.
not the greatest plot (and sorry if i spoiled it)

but then these words echo through my mind.
the scene=
 having sex with my female partner and eventually ejaculating
after the initial sigh of aknowledgement the sexual act has finished
she says "Do it again".
or having a blowjob, cumming and before the last drop is out and shes still watersnakeing it..
"do it again".

There is a horrible moment of impotence after ejaculation
something the abused and the raped have taken on as a glimpse of a peacefull world.
and yet from the mass HAP perspective
this enormous droplet of spunk of several billion males ,all having briefly lost
is easily as dangerous as the Tachyon antenae from another dimension leading us to destruction.

in short. the attempts to objectify the male have NOT aided the process of sexual equality.

i have hit a few cervix in my time and will not remember one
not because i cannot if i try
but because the cervix is an internal part of another being
and within life.. we are born alone, die alone, and totality for us to be healthy
requires our tantra is overall alone.

I know there are males with awareness disease who will count their sexual history in terms
of cervix contact, tonsil contact and ****..
men who will consider sex to be the depth of hole and shape of flesh displaced by their penis.
will never recapitulate to the time before penetration and see the labia as sealed- beyond which only NOTHING.
men who must create an energy body that has a permanent erection for them to occasionally inhabit, built out of worry of losing their edge.
its pretty gross..

but so too are their women who declare ALL men to be potential rapists..
equally as bad as the men who ignore labia and count only cervix/
or can count only once, and only if it is a virgin.

women in their objectification of men are sculptors of our destiny to a certain extent
i know ive had sex over 10000 times with 35 women
but i will never recapitulate the act of penetration.
and still seek to recapitulate the moments before .

i used to consider the solarsystem wide aura of the HAP as being like two
hollowed out glass giants.. whos interlocking bits were diffuse and expansive.
tantric gates the property of no single person.
tantric gates representing a wounded people

i hoped i suppose
that by mapping out the instants before pentration
and aligning them in the sorcerers world
that i could travel to the giant hole of the universal female
and not be sucked in by her desire to maim another.

[find dharma girl]

Single cell, to amphibian, to reptile, to mammal.. involves a rather violent reproductive drive.  Our ancestry was marked by patriarchal domination.  One male ape controlled a 'shrewdness' of approximately ten submissive males and ten submissive females.  It was recently discovered that the dominant ape is actually hardwired with a gene distinguishing itself from the others.

    If genetics won't convince you, empirical observation should.  All of the dominant ape's gestures of authority, pleasure and pride are reflected identically in a confident man today, just as the mannerisms of a socially recessive man or woman are exactly the same as a submissive ape.

   (a confident woman is a ****)


   Why the fuss?  Human history in universal time is hardly a blink.  I mean, the difference between a worm and a human on a cosmic scale is nothing.   Einstein has virtually no smarts over a ****, and Mother Teresa is on par with Hitler.
 
   I fit myself with conventional clothing, but I AM being real here.

rosygyro, you are lucky to have dick so big that it reaches the woman's cervix.  
JJ, do not listen to Kuntomea.. don't be a man---> be the sissy boy ya are.
Kuntomea, why this feminist sh*t?   YOU the man.  Strap it........    JJ is on four!

rosygyro:  i hoped i suppose
that by mapping out the instants before pentration
and aligning them in the sorcerers world
(mapping out?  Before penetration, I  move from the mid cortex, down the reptillian stem brain, and align only with my crotch for intelligence)

that i could travel to the giant hole of the universal female
(****I KNOW such a HOLE here on this forum...)

and not be sucked in by her desire to maim another.
(rosygyro, you've experienced vagina dentata)

[Julio Juliopolis]

Kao13 wrote:
JJ the issue isn't about gender. The issue is unfair treatment, regardless of gender, income, or belief.  If "the issue" you're talking about is feminism then it's very obvious even in the definition you provided earlier, which I pointed out was written by feminists that the issue is about sex. If you want to whine, add in other issues to strengthen your argument. Whether or not mentioning issues is whining is a matter of opinion. It would be nice if those opinions would be soundly based on the nature of the issues themselves, rather than on the gender-exclusive empathy of modern society. As it stands you sound like a misinformed dude angry at vaginas. What mental gymnastics did you go through to reach that conclusion? He doesn't agree with feminists... feminists want to empower women... women have vaginas... thus he's angry at vaginas! Also, calling someone else misinformed without first examining the information they do have is just idiocy. That you read what I've written here and conclude I "sound like a misinformed dude angry at vaginas" says a lot more about your ability or willingness to rationally consider these issues than it does about me. Be a man! Take a stand!I have a male body and was born more than 18 years ago. Thus, I am a man. I can't not be a man, at least not while I'm awake in this world, short of gender re-assignment surgery. But of course that's not what people mean when they say "Be a man!". What they mean is "Follow my rules and base your self-image of yourself as a man on them!". Er, no thanks.

[Julio Juliopolis]

Hey billy,

Thanks for that well thought out and meaningful post. I'm sure many will find it worthwhile and something other than part of your usual sh*tting all over the site.

[rosygyro]

rosygyro, you are lucky to have dick so big that it reaches the woman's cervix.  ..................I probably don't. As i said i don't remember.hey maybe its a coping mechanism.

[Guest]

rosygyro wrote:

i hoped i suppose
that by mapping out the instants before pentration
and aligning them in the sorcerers world
that i could travel to the giant hole of the universal female
and not be sucked in by her desire to maim another.

You always had access to the universal female. To survive the objective hole hunting you would have to reverse history itself for the UF is the result of the choices humanity has made. You cannot change one, without rewriting all. When you change one, you control the future and time itself.

That's what you hoped for? I mean, you did it for the hole, but I hoped you knew how deep it went. The universe is like a tampon...sometimes an entire galaxy will fall out upon removal.

The blood of the existence covers your hands now.

If you give a mouse a cookie, they begin to hope, to dream, and before they know it... they are made red and covered in their own blood.

You were maimed. You survived. Have you birthed a new hope?

[Guest]

Julio Juliopolis wrote:Kao13 wrote:

JJ the issue isn't about gender. The issue is unfair treatment, regardless of gender, income, or belief.  If "the issue" you're talking about is feminism then it's very obvious even in the definition you provided earlier, which I pointed out was written by feminists that the issue is about sex. If you want to whine, add in other issues to strengthen your argument. Whether or not mentioning issues is whining is a matter of opinion. It would be nice if those opinions would be soundly based on the nature of the issues themselves, rather than on the gender-exclusive empathy of modern society. As it stands you sound like a misinformed dude angry at vaginas. What mental gymnastics did you go through to reach that conclusion? He doesn't agree with feminists... feminists want to empower women... women have vaginas... thus he's angry at vaginas! Also, calling someone else misinformed without first examining the information they do have is just idiocy. That you read what I've written here and conclude I "sound like a misinformed dude angry at vaginas" says a lot more about your ability or willingness to rationally consider these issues than it does about me. Be a man! Take a stand!I have a male body and was born more than 18 years ago. Thus, I am a man. I can't not be a man, at least not while I'm awake in this world, short of gender re-assignment surgery. But of course that's not what people mean when they say "Be a man!". What they mean is "Follow my rules and base your self-image of yourself as a man on them!". Er, no thanks.

Oh, I didn't realize you were being serious.

So. Being serious... you seriously are offended at people helping themselves? What bubble did you grow up in? You're complaining about unequal rights because women are supported? Your response to unfair treatment is to rewrite an opinion article on the internet?

Holy mother of insanity!

For crying out loud, if you're upset go DO something! Start a faction, create a war, network! Instead you sit behind a keyboard to ****?

You must not be angry enough yet. Only passionate people create change. Sheep whine.

[Guest]

Billy, the feminist **** was because JJ chose to assume the position. He becomes most upset when an assertive female presents herself. He favors the sympathetic mother, so I'm trying to help him break the habit by systemically breaking that mold.

He's doing great so far. He's willing to engage the frustration. Now that I'm presenting as condescending he may disengage but that would work too. Discussion is progress via desensitization. Avoidance is progress via fury. If he gives up then he loses. Any outcome is satisfying....progress or a loss. I win with either. He wins with progress.

Billy. I have missed you. Don't do that again.

[Julio Juliopolis]

Kao13 wrote:
Oh, I didn't realize you were being serious.Serious isn't quite the right way to say it. Rational in spite of your transparent attempts to steer things away from rationality which you continued here.
So. Being serious... you seriously are offended at people helping themselves? Nope. How about connecting the things you're writing to the things I've written which you're responding to? What bubble did you grow up in? You're complaining about unequal rights because women are supported? Your response to unfair treatment is to rewrite an opinion article on the internet? Nonsensical question, no, and I've never done that.
Holy mother of insanity!

For crying out loud, if you're upset go DO something! Start a faction, create a war, network! Instead you sit behind a keyboard to ****? Who said I was upset? It's true that I have been upset with feminism in the past, but really I never saw that there was much I could do about it. Although some of the writings "I sat behind a keyboard" to create did have an effect. I remember when a lurker to the newsgroup I used to frequent emailed me to tell me he'd been so inspired by them that he was going to create a group and wanted permission to use my writings, with credit of course. I didn't expect much to come of it, this was near the end of my "activist" days and I'd seen so little change in society as a result of what we'd done I'd pretty much given up. However, the man was polite and I was flattered to be singled out, (I later found out so were 7 others xD ), so I gave him full permission provided that if he was going to edit anything he'd link back to the original source. It was some number of years later when I first heard of the group MGTOW, (an acronym for Men Going Their Own Way), and some years after that before I ever went to look at their website. I was surprised to see my old online nickname on there and to learn that this was the group the original mystery lurker who'd emailed me years before had created. I did see some of my old writings there, and true to his word the guy didn't edit them. So, do I get to put a checkmark by "start a faction"? 

You must not be angry enough yet. Only passionate people create change. Sheep whine.Getting angrier probably isn't a good strategy, but thanks for the suggestion. Lots of passionate people have proven unable to create change when the powers that be don't want that change to happen, for example, the US war with Iraq or this recent oil pipeline thtough the Dakotas. The powers that be back feminism, and thus any change towards real equality will be difficult. There is some good news for the MRM though, the movie "The Red Pill", in spite of multiple bannings and much feminist inspired censorship, (because in the movie men's rights activists are allowed to present some arguments), is gaining traction! It was number 1 on Netflix before they removed it. It's been a long time since September, when the premier of the movie was cancelled by the Australian theater which had scheduled it due to feminist pressure, and the longer the battle's gone the more interest the movie has generated.

[Julio Juliopolis]

Kao13 wrote:Billy, the feminist **** was because JJ chose to assume the position. He becomes most upset when an assertive female presents herself. He favors the sympathetic mother, so I'm trying to help him break the habit by systemically breaking that mold. Yadda yadda.  

He's doing great so far. He's willing to engage the frustration. Now that I'm presenting as condescending he may disengage but that would work too. Discussion is progress via desensitization. Avoidance is progress via fury. If he gives up then he loses. Any outcome is satisfying....progress or a loss. I win with either. He wins with progress. So I must keep replying to your nonsense or I lose? Hmmm.... well that sounds legit, but originally I decided to come into this thread to see if I could get rosy to question his assumption that patriarchy exists, by teaching him the difference between the people in charge being male and thus giving other males advantages, (which would be patriarchy), and the people in charge being male and not giving a f*ck about other males, (which is a type of oligarchy). I think he learned it. Billy's reply on the other hand about how gorillas always have a male in charge and thus their society is patriarchal humorously shows the bottom of the intellectual barrel for reading comprehension on his part. Still he didn't start randomly accusing me of hating vaginas and encouraging me to hate them more, so maybe he wasn't the bottom of the barrel after all.

[Guest]

Sweet JJ.  Let me put basic, transparent, and simple.  I will even use a picture since you still lack true understanding of what I'm doing:



Here is a numbered list for you:

1. I presented an ideo I knew you were opposed to (see: lead post).
2. You countered argued.
3. I counter-counter argued.
4. You are being rational (which you always are when you argue).
5. I refuse rationality because that the only thing you accept.  

Your choices:
1. Continue to demand rationality!  Which got you a picture and numbered list, well done!
2. Be irrational and copy my expression (which would likely confuse me, briefly).
3. Give no fucks.

Your rationality won you some degree of rationality in response so yay!  Your tactic worked!  But for how long?  Is this truly a rational post?  Have I responded to your request to address your core concerns?  Will you seriously attempt to answer each of my questions?  Am I fucking with you or are you fucking with me?  If it's a contest of who's having the most fun, who might win?  If it's a contest of who is most rational, who might win?  If it's a contest of who's most amazing, I win.

I win!

Okay, okay, now seriously.  Tell me how I'm being a unicorn and whine about your points going missed again.  Do it!  See what will happen!

Be like SilverWind and argue with someone (me) who cares enough to show you, but respects you enough not to tell you [the truth].

[Julio Juliopolis]

Kao13 wrote:Sweet JJ.  Let me put basic, transparent, and simple.  I will even use a picture since you still lack true understanding of what I'm doing:
Ah good. I'm glad you included a picture so I wouldn't have to rely on just words for understanding.

Here is a numbered list for you:
A numbered list too! You're too kind.1. I presented an ideo I knew you were opposed to (see: lead post).I noticed.2. You countered argued.A little. Originally I was going to ignore this stalk but I wanted to give rosy a new way of looking at stuff. Beyond that was just me indulging.3. I counter-counter argued.That's debatable.4. You are being rational (which you always are when you argue).Thank you. I guess I just don't see much point to making irrational arguments. Perhaps if I was trying to run a pyramid scheme and convince people it was in their best interest to give me money in exchange for nothing I'd take up the art of making irrational arguments.5. I refuse rationality because that the only thing you accept.  That's not a rational reason.

Your choices:
1. Continue to demand rationality!  Which got you a picture and numbered list, well done!Those are worthy fruits no doubt, but where did I make this demand of you?2. Be irrational and copy my expression (which would likely confuse me, briefly).I don't think I'd have to copy you to be irrational. That's just one way to do it.3. Give no fucks.
I've been doing that all along.Is this truly a rational post?  Have I responded to your request to address your core concerns?  Will you seriously attempt to answer each of my questions?No, no, and maybe. Am I fucking with you or are you fucking with me?  If it's a contest of who's having the most fun, who might win?  If it's a contest of who is most rational, who might win?  If it's a contest of who's most amazing, I win.Both, unknown, me, and opinion.Okay, okay, now seriously.  Tell me how I'm being a unicorn and whine about your points going missed again.  Do it!  See what will happen!Ok. You're being a unicorn! You missed my points completely! (This better be good)

[Guest]

That's adorable you used the more appropriate word. You do enjoy arguing

Funny you bring up pyramid schemes. I run one of those; for-profit. You should try it, maybe you could invest in a better phone plan. Join cult Kao and I'll show you how

[rosygyro]

[Nagual Menagerie]

Julio Juliopolis wrote:Hey billy,

Thanks for that well thought out and meaningful post. I'm sure many will find it worthwhile and something other than part of your usual sh*tting all over the site.
I would rather read Billy's honest emotions than your attempt to appear intelligent and rational.  Crazy doesn't conceal itself well; the fact that Billy waves his freak flag says that he's likely the most sane of us here.  The notion that you attempt to shield yourself with a sane argument over what is obviously a **** attempt by Kao to argue with people tells me "you know nothing, John Snow."  JJ, you're like a five scoop, same flavor personality.

[Guest]

[Guest]

[Guest]