Whatever is, is Right

[SelfHealedMadman]

~The universe is pure intelligence: absolute, unerring,
perfect. So what's the difference between the ocean and the stars and the
subatomic world and you? 


Ego, self importance. 


Ego-clad beings alone are capable of imperfection. We alone,
in our segregated condition, are capable of all the things the universe isn't:
error, folly, emotionality, stupidity, appreciation, love, hate, exploration,
awe, self-importance, meaning, art, genocide, and a very long list of other
qualities including, most importantly for our purposes, aspiration. 


We can aspire beyond ourselves, beyond segregated selfhood:
we can transcend our own natures. We can aspire to divest ourselves of our
self-limiting programming and merge back into the integrated condition from
which ego artificially segregates us. 


Ultimately, of course, an ego-bound humanity is a subsystem,
just like the ocean and the stars and the grass and what looks like error from
within is perfection from without. We are perfect in our imperfection: flawed
by design. 


When we divest ourselves of our egoic insistence on judging
actions, intentions, thoughts and feelings as right or wrong, good or bad,
positive or negative, we see that the only criteria by which anything might be judged
is by whether or not it occurs. The heretic is correct in committing his
heresy, if he does, and the angry mob is correct in burning him to death, if
they do. There is no right or wrong or good or evil, only is and isn't. 


Whatever is, is right. 


All is for the best in this, the best of all possible
worlds.

[Erasmia]

Hi, I like your post it show alots for me, but I cant find much hope in it, it sounds to me like a tear, tear for life you are trying to embrace into your life, Its best for us to aspire for the best possible outce, when stop to feel it somehow "interrupting" the flow and let it jump at ourselves fully, there is no choice in the flavor, we had this right and nothing heretic cant occccur if the virgin is man if woman became man to save the whole humanity, we have whole earth at our toes, yet what we do? We move our hands not on the earth but into sky, imagine beign a tree in the forest, your head is down, your roots are in the earth you dont see in space, you cant, you must loose all the flavored manhood designs, there are alot of deities and judging intetion but still in the heart, I feel there some bigger adventure to this like satyr playing on flute on the tree, It feel really strange all the possible worlds, all we can attain, but the right is outhfully ours, we can try to be more of a wolfs and puppets, but we do not want, we flow like liver warmth. We have alot of planets in our body in ourselves the thoughts and feelings but never before we found this particular one, the blue, we would like to make some more contact "invisible", so if you help in residing to the death, you can find alot in your life!, you have so much opportunites, the clouds, winds, waters and fire we have in hearts! we can use it and imagine if you pick out and give to it some more colors than just is...something more flower like, like mayan lotos.
LET THE LOTOS BURN! In our glory!

[shamanka]

the universe being pure intelligence and absolute, is the subjective perception that actually creates the illusion of that man made concept of 'ego'...if you didn't 'know' it was so...you couldn't cling to that idea of 'self',

to aspire beyond ourselves, is to drop the absolute fixing, of what we state is the case.however that doesn't happen externally, thats just a pure projection, reflection of what we assume we know..

would it matter whether the universe was 'pure intelligence'....(what is that anyway)...or not.?

as above, so below, fixing ones ideas about the universe, fixes ideas about the self..

to suggest it is 'intelligence', suggests 'design', suggests 'slavery', suggests 'conflict' within and without, constantly renewed by the cycle of using one belief, made manifest.

as an alternative, maybe the universe is just energy, potential electromagnetic presence that has no design, but is there as a commodity...not 'perfect', no 'design', not 'imperfect', no 'contradiction', no 'intelligence'.

you say, 'to transcend ones own nature'...maybe its to transcend into nature, whether you decide to own that, as a design, or allow it, as that was all, it ever was...is the range of potential subjective perception you are entitled to..yet not fixed, by 'design', to be ruled by...

humanity is not ego bound, you project that it is ego bound, reinforcing that belief into your world view. so it indeed reflects to you that bubble, you are determined to perceive, your intent and 'intelligence' strives to convince you, you are safe in your assumptions, giving you, a sense of self.

wouldn't a design of self, be self important?

it is this sense, that tells you, you are 'perfect in your imperfection'...to state 'our' here was a projection, a belief, a sense of self design, laid upon whats actually available.....your safety blanket, of the theory, of your mind...

there is no 'ultimately', a statement of your fixed self state.....there is no perfection, neither is their imperfection, there is no, one world view, neither is their meant to be, 'over unity' between facets..
no design of the 'one'.

sure, we are all energy..but that doesn't not lead to the necessity of commonality.

red is not blue, and never will be, the fact that blue isn't blue and red isn't red..isn't a fault, of design or intelligence, but deeper connection to the underpinning diversity and range of the kaleidoscope here...

So i ask, what is underlying, that concept of design...would it worry you, that it was everything but design?

could you now perceive, that the concept of ego, could be everything but ego?

How would this alter your world view and sense of self, if they were everything but?

turning everything inside out, brings about perception change, if you are truly with the nature of things..which could be either, or something else.... if the nature of things is that fluid...if it is, just the way, it could ever possibly be perceived...then no layers of 'design' or 'intelligence' is required for it to still function...with or without 'you', having a sense of you.

after all it existed before your form was present and it will exist long after your form has disappeared.
it supports your existence, as it supports all existence here...it has no bias to choose one life form over another...it just supports its own nature. which is a potential commodity, not a slave to any 'one' design..it supports freedom, which is potentially what we could identify as the 'self'....

[Guest]

[Guest]

[Guest]