Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
i wouldnt keep a woman barefoot and pregnanti wouldnt keep anyone in ignorance that they could gestate something unwillingly conceived.
i wouldnt poison the water supply with pennyroyal in order to liberate the few who could not choose nay.
i once had i girlfriend walk up to me in college and point to her pregnant belly..and say..
" You see this here? This is YOU.. I am killing YOU"
she then went for an abortion.
as far as she could see the portion of the child that was her, was still in her, with her and part of her
and would be reabsorbed even liberated further by the death of the lost part of me.
for me it was an open shamanic attack, her choice.
a partial truth that the woman is lucky enough to spend nine months in the same time and space as the unborn..
while the man can be anything from a nanometre to 40,000 miles away whilst moving in no easily trackable or relative sense
from his portion of developing life.
some men take this impossible time space conundrum as a cause to become aloof and deny a birth
some take this conundrum as a loss or theft of the clarity they felt when the life was just spunk in their balls
and demand some living return on investment... or at least the right to use their living spunk with a second woman.
so as not to feel.. you know.. the pain.
some men demand contraception and abortion be a right for women because they cannot stand conception caused by other males.
will incite the rights of women to deny all men on principle of sexism
blind to their own heterophobic wrath.
my concrete-
is that it takes more tantric skill to take it out in its entirety than it does to stick it in.
works on so many levels.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
billy wrote:rosygyro, please name your primaries here. That is, reduce to the simplest objective concrete(s).
For example, it would seem clear to me if a society consisted of a few men and women on a small island, it would be barbaric to force a woman to give birth, where she would otherwise abort her pregnancy. With just several persons involved, it would seem logical that the woman would have control over her own body.
Why would someone else be given authority over her autonomy in that context? What principle lawfully changes with larger numbers of persons? I don't see it. I mean, I would not force a woman on that island. I would not force a woman on this planet.
Let me get to the subject at hand. Let me take a stab at reducing for you, rosygyro. The root subject here is Power. Antecedent to Power in humans and sorcery, is hierarchy of Power in mammal groups from which we are born. Please identify a principle or two at the base.
Oh hell, I'll do that as well- even back before a brain cell was formed.
At a phenomenological level I can see no logic supporting what 'ought' to be. No thing had to be.
Skipping ahead without basis, excepting the brutish reality preceding us---> some don Power and others not much so. Now, you can view the logic I assigned as to the woman's autonomy. It no longer has much bearing. The Power of a man forcing the woman to bring the pregnancy to term has come full circle. Underneath, this is not much to do with ethics. It is about Power.
I hear something about sharing Power, but that cuts against any primitive societal instincts (whether mites, monkeys or men), I've generally known. I have Power, now deal with it [LOL].
mis conception, preconception, conception. abortion. the mind it rejects all sorts of perceptions it feels are conception of others thought forms.
individuality of mind is a constantly abortive process.
autonomy in a world of conception is not autonomy at all.
on this basis the male must take responsibility for that of him which is rejected
take responsibility for that of him which is nurtured in his absence..
if that area be an absence within him because something once stemming from him
is loved despite, in spite and blessed respite from him.. then that absence can only be filled
through recapitulation..
**** moved on.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
rosygyro, please name your primaries here. That is, reduce to the simplest objective concrete(s).
For example, it would seem clear to me if a society consisted of a few men and women on a small island, it would be barbaric to force a woman to give birth, where she would otherwise abort her pregnancy. With just several persons involved, it would seem logical that the woman would have control over her own body.
Why would someone else be given authority over her autonomy in that context? What principle lawfully changes with larger numbers of persons? I don't see it. I mean, I would not force a woman on that island. I would not force a woman on this planet.
Let me get to the subject at hand. Let me take a stab at reducing for you, rosygyro. The root subject here is Power. Antecedent to Power in humans and sorcery, is hierarchy of Power in mammal groups from which we are born. Please identify a principle or two at the base.
Oh hell, I'll do that as well- even back before a brain cell was formed.
At a phenomenological level I can see no logic supporting what 'ought' to be. No thing had to be.
Skipping ahead without basis, excepting the brutish reality preceding us---> some don Power and others not much so. Now, you can view the logic I assigned as to the woman's autonomy. It no longer has much bearing. The Power of a man forcing the woman to bring the pregnancy to term has come full circle. Underneath, this is not much to do with ethics. It is about Power.
I hear something about sharing Power, but that cuts against any primitive societal instincts (whether mites, monkeys or men), I've generally known. I have Power, now deal with it [LOL].
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
i wouldnt keep a woman barefoot and pregnanti wouldnt keep anyone in ignorance that they could gestate something unwillingly conceived.
i wouldnt poison the water supply with pennyroyal in order to liberate the few who could not choose nay.
i once had i girlfriend walk up to me in college and point to her pregnant belly..and say..
" You see this here? This is YOU.. I am killing YOU"
she then went for an abortion.
as far as she could see the portion of the child that was her, was still in her, with her and part of her
and would be reabsorbed even liberated further by the death of the lost part of me.
for me it was an open shamanic attack, her choice.
a partial truth that the woman is lucky enough to spend nine months in the same time and space as the unborn..
while the man can be anything from a nanometre to 40,000 miles away whilst moving in no easily trackable or relative sense
from his portion of developing life.
some men take this impossible time space conundrum as a cause to become aloof and deny a birth
some take this conundrum as a loss or theft of the clarity they felt when the life was just spunk in their balls
and demand some living return on investment... or at least the right to use their living spunk with a second woman.
so as not to feel.. you know.. the pain.
some men demand contraception and abortion be a right for women because they cannot stand conception caused by other males.
will incite the rights of women to deny all men on principle of sexism
blind to their own heterophobic wrath.
my concrete-
is that it takes more tantric skill to take it out in its entirety than it does to stick it in.
works on so many levels.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
billy wrote:rosygyro, please name your primaries here. That is, reduce to the simplest objective concrete(s).
For example, it would seem clear to me if a society consisted of a few men and women on a small island, it would be barbaric to force a woman to give birth, where she would otherwise abort her pregnancy. With just several persons involved, it would seem logical that the woman would have control over her own body.
Why would someone else be given authority over her autonomy in that context? What principle lawfully changes with larger numbers of persons? I don't see it. I mean, I would not force a woman on that island. I would not force a woman on this planet.
Let me get to the subject at hand. Let me take a stab at reducing for you, rosygyro. The root subject here is Power. Antecedent to Power in humans and sorcery, is hierarchy of Power in mammal groups from which we are born. Please identify a principle or two at the base.
Oh hell, I'll do that as well- even back before a brain cell was formed.
At a phenomenological level I can see no logic supporting what 'ought' to be. No thing had to be.
Skipping ahead without basis, excepting the brutish reality preceding us---> some don Power and others not much so. Now, you can view the logic I assigned as to the woman's autonomy. It no longer has much bearing. The Power of a man forcing the woman to bring the pregnancy to term has come full circle. Underneath, this is not much to do with ethics. It is about Power.
I hear something about sharing Power, but that cuts against any primitive societal instincts (whether mites, monkeys or men), I've generally known. I have Power, now deal with it [LOL].
mis conception, preconception, conception. abortion. the mind it rejects all sorts of perceptions it feels are conception of others thought forms.
individuality of mind is a constantly abortive process.
autonomy in a world of conception is not autonomy at all.
on this basis the male must take responsibility for that of him which is rejected
take responsibility for that of him which is nurtured in his absence..
if that area be an absence within him because something once stemming from him
is loved despite, in spite and blessed respite from him.. then that absence can only be filled
through recapitulation..
**** moved on.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
rosygyro, good for you on that subjectivity bent. Thus, it begins there.
My impeccable recap lasted for several months (5-7). I hardly ever slept more than a few hours. Though objectiviy is the tool, subjectivity surely is the entire body of recap. I was consumingly, wholly myself to the exclusion of an external world.
What I did was amazing, and I wanted even more. So a few months after the that recap concluded I went ALL IN. I wanted to destroy myself with shame, self hatred, and self-negation generally with avid recap fixed on just those things mentioned. About a month into this I began having identical, repeat nightmares that were morbidly reeking of death and foreboding. Yet, when I realized these were going to recur nightly without exception, I began to anticipate and embrace the nightmare. Even so, the jolt to my system was massively intrusive. Interestingly, Susan would begin screaming from her sleep state silmutaneously each and every time without exception. This happened for two weeks.
Then, one morning I woke up with unequivocal knowledge that this happening was abruptly at cessation. I had utter comprehension that I was disengaged from the world as I had experienced it before. That is, I was factually detached without my doing. I was empty. I had no clue what to do with my self, with my thoughts and emotions. These had no quality of connection or import. Technically I was insane, except for that I was able to drop down into the quiet empty at anytime. I tried to emerge many times as a viable party to the world, but it was useless because my emotions would careen so wildly and without sense that I could only drop back into peace at the bottom. After a couple weeks I realized what a 'gift' I had inherited. I would only move out from the tranquil emptiness. I had near perfect equanimity, and understood to be even more detached and aware when thoughts and emotions stabilized some. What I had not learned at this juncture was how to control the subjectivity for creative, objective value.
Then I accidentally came here, and immediately serloco began showing me. But, serloco is not entirely grounded and so I entered a sorceric limbo. Kaomea began stalking me, and more [MORE] or less made a fool out of me by manipulating me into her wholehearted submissive. Kaomea {whether by being thoughtful or careless (or both)} did show me the error of my ways. She taught me subjectivity and sorcery required a goodly mixture of fluidity and objectivity together. As an example, a sorcerer can be likened to a manager of workers. If she/he is to get the optimum responses and productive outcomes, she/he must objectify the entities. Though I project, I yell at this one, have patience with that one, and encourage another with compliments because the entities respond differently. I pay attention in my fully subjective autonomy, and I objectify in the forthcoming time. I can SEE [KNOW] if I practice this. Interacting with reflective dialogue only complicates what should be simple, as I already know HOW and WHY to act. Do I really need to entertain the others' emanations through linguistics? If I ask, I am partially enslaved to another's script in the play. When focused on the HOW and WHY of my being, I readily CHOOSE to command the outcomes based on SEEING [KNOWING] what is what.
watergaze will kindly sharpen this aspect of potential manifestation. She will show me that fluidity is NOT divergent from the objective moving into corporeal.. AND THIS while I retain the entirety of my own subjectivity, else there be no integrity. In return, I will show her that sorcerers as myself can MANIFEST hugely (and kindly).
I AM authentic as there ever will be. I AM passionate and empathetic too. I AM GOOD!
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
watergaze, to make certain you know this, I AM asking you - NOT commanding. So it is clear, I reiterate that I AM calling for my own deference to you in any way you should determine appropriate. This deference is real and spiritually charged. I will give you my best attention. I will consider greatly your opinions on how I manifest the knowledge gained.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
rosygyro, good for you on that subjectivity bent. Thus, it begins there.
My impeccable recap lasted for several months (5-7). I hardly ever slept more than a few hours. Though objectiviy is the tool, subjectivity surely is the entire body of recap. I was consumingly, wholly myself to the exclusion of an external world.
What I did was amazing, and I wanted even more. So a few months after the that recap concluded I went ALL IN. I wanted to destroy myself with shame, self hatred, and self-negation generally with avid recap fixed on just those things mentioned. About a month into this I began having identical, repeat nightmares that were morbidly reeking of death and foreboding. Yet, when I realized these were going to recur nightly without exception, I began to anticipate and embrace the nightmare. Even so, the jolt to my system was massively intrusive. Interestingly, Susan would begin screaming from her sleep state silmutaneously each and every time without exception. This happened for two weeks.
Then, one morning I woke up with unequivocal knowledge that this happening was abruptly at cessation. I had utter comprehension that I was disengaged from the world as I had experienced it before. That is, I was factually detached without my doing. I was empty. I had no clue what to do with my self, with my thoughts and emotions. These had no quality of connection or import. Technically I was insane, except for that I was able to drop down into the quiet empty at anytime. I tried to emerge many times as a viable party to the world, but it was useless because my emotions would careen so wildly and without sense that I could only drop back into peace at the bottom. After a couple weeks I realized what a 'gift' I had inherited. I would only move out from the tranquil emptiness. I had near perfect equanimity, and understood to be even more detached and aware when thoughts and emotions stabilized some. What I had not learned at this juncture was how to control the subjectivity for creative, objective value.
Then I accidentally came here, and immediately serloco began showing me. But, serloco is not entirely grounded and so I entered a sorceric limbo. Kaomea began stalking me, and more [MORE] or less made a fool out of me by manipulating me into her wholehearted submissive. Kaomea {whether by being thoughtful or careless (or both)} did show me the error of my ways. She taught me subjectivity and sorcery required a goodly mixture of fluidity and objectivity together. As an example, a sorcerer can be likened to a manager of workers. If she/he is to get the optimum responses and productive outcomes, she/he must objectify the entities. Though I project, I yell at this one, have patience with that one, and encourage another with compliments because the entities respond differently. I pay attention in my fully subjective autonomy, and I objectify in the forthcoming time. I can SEE [KNOW] if I practice this. Interacting with reflective dialogue only complicates what should be simple, as I already know HOW and WHY to act. Do I really need to entertain the others' emanations through linguistics? If I ask, I am partially enslaved to another's script in the play. When focused on the HOW and WHY of my being, I readily CHOOSE to command the outcomes based on SEEING [KNOWING] what is what.
watergaze will kindly sharpen this aspect of potential manifestation. She will show me that fluidity is NOT divergent from the objective moving into corporeal.. AND THIS while I retain the entirety of my own subjectivity, else there be no integrity. In return, I will show her that sorcerers as myself can MANIFEST hugely (and kindly).
I AM authentic as there ever will be. I AM passionate and empathetic too. I AM GOOD!
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
watergaze, to make certain you know this, I AM asking you - NOT commanding. So it is clear, I reiterate that I AM calling for my own deference to you in any way you should determine appropriate. This deference is real and spiritually charged. I will give you my best attention. I will consider greatly your opinions on how I manifest the knowledge gained.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
rosygyro, good for you on that subjectivity bent. Thus, it begins there.
My impeccable recap lasted for several months (5-7). I hardly ever slept more than a few hours. Though objectiviy is the tool, subjectivity surely is the entire body of recap. I was consumingly, wholly myself to the exclusion of an external world.
What I did was amazing, and I wanted even more. So a few months after the that recap concluded I went ALL IN. I wanted to destroy myself with shame, self hatred, and self-negation generally with avid recap fixed on just those things mentioned. About a month into this I began having identical, repeat nightmares that were morbidly reeking of death and foreboding. Yet, when I realized these were going to recur nightly without exception, I began to anticipate and embrace the nightmare. Even so, the jolt to my system was massively intrusive. Interestingly, Susan would begin screaming from her sleep state silmutaneously each and every time without exception. This happened for two weeks.
Then, one morning I woke up with unequivocal knowledge that this happening was abruptly at cessation. I had utter comprehension that I was disengaged from the world as I had experienced it before. That is, I was factually detached without my doing. I was empty. I had no clue what to do with my self, with my thoughts and emotions. These had no quality of connection or import. Technically I was insane, except for that I was able to drop down into the quiet empty at anytime. I tried to emerge many times as a viable party to the world, but it was useless because my emotions would careen so wildly and without sense that I could only drop back into peace at the bottom. After a couple weeks I realized what a 'gift' I had inherited. I would only move out from the tranquil emptiness. I had near perfect equanimity, and understood to be even more detached and aware when thoughts and emotions stabilized some. What I had not learned at this juncture was how to control the subjectivity for creative, objective value.
Then I accidentally came here, and immediately serloco began showing me. But, serloco is not entirely grounded and so I entered a sorceric limbo. Kaomea began stalking me, and more [MORE] or less made a fool out of me by manipulating me into her wholehearted submissive. Kaomea {whether by being thoughtful or careless (or both)} did show me the error of my ways. She taught me subjectivity and sorcery required a goodly mixture of fluidity and objectivity together. As an example, a sorcerer can be likened to a manager of workers. If she/he is to get the optimum responses and productive outcomes, she/he must objectify the entities. Though I project, I yell at this one, have patience with that one, and encourage another with compliments because the entities respond differently. I pay attention in my fully subjective autonomy, and I objectify in the forthcoming time. I can SEE [KNOW] if I practice this. Interacting with reflective dialogue only complicates what should be simple, as I already know HOW and WHY to act. Do I really need to entertain the others' emanations through linguistics? If I ask, I am partially enslaved to another's script in the play. When focused on the HOW and WHY of my being, I readily CHOOSE to command the outcomes based on SEEING [KNOWING] what is what.
watergaze will kindly sharpen this aspect of potential manifestation. She will show me that fluidity is NOT divergent from the objective moving into corporeal.. AND THIS while I retain the entirety of my own subjectivity, else there be no integrity. In return, I will show her that sorcerers as myself can MANIFEST hugely (and kindly).
I AM authentic as there ever will be. I AM passionate and empathetic too. I AM GOOD!
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
watergaze, to make certain you know this, I AM asking you - NOT commanding. So it is clear, I reiterate that I AM calling for my own deference to you in any way you should determine appropriate. This deference is real and spiritually charged. I will give you my best attention. I will consider greatly your opinions on how I manifest the knowledge gained.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
rosygyro, good for you on that subjectivity bent. Thus, it begins there.
My impeccable recap lasted for several months (5-7). I hardly ever slept more than a few hours. Though objectiviy is the tool, subjectivity surely is the entire body of recap. I was consumingly, wholly myself to the exclusion of an external world.
What I did was amazing, and I wanted even more. So a few months after the that recap concluded I went ALL IN. I wanted to destroy myself with shame, self hatred, and self-negation generally with avid recap fixed on just those things mentioned. About a month into this I began having identical, repeat nightmares that were morbidly reeking of death and foreboding. Yet, when I realized these were going to recur nightly without exception, I began to anticipate and embrace the nightmare. Even so, the jolt to my system was massively intrusive. Interestingly, Susan would begin screaming from her sleep state silmutaneously each and every time without exception. This happened for two weeks.
Then, one morning I woke up with unequivocal knowledge that this happening was abruptly at cessation. I had utter comprehension that I was disengaged from the world as I had experienced it before. That is, I was factually detached without my doing. I was empty. I had no clue what to do with my self, with my thoughts and emotions. These had no quality of connection or import. Technically I was insane, except for that I was able to drop down into the quiet empty at anytime. I tried to emerge many times as a viable party to the world, but it was useless because my emotions would careen so wildly and without sense that I could only drop back into peace at the bottom. After a couple weeks I realized what a 'gift' I had inherited. I would only move out from the tranquil emptiness. I had near perfect equanimity, and understood to be even more detached and aware when thoughts and emotions stabilized some. What I had not learned at this juncture was how to control the subjectivity for creative, objective value.
Then I accidentally came here, and immediately serloco began showing me. But, serloco is not entirely grounded and so I entered a sorceric limbo. Kaomea began stalking me, and more [MORE] or less made a fool out of me by manipulating me into her wholehearted submissive. Kaomea {whether by being thoughtful or careless (or both)} did show me the error of my ways. She taught me subjectivity and sorcery required a goodly mixture of fluidity and objectivity together. As an example, a sorcerer can be likened to a manager of workers. If she/he is to get the optimum responses and productive outcomes, she/he must objectify the entities. Though I project, I yell at this one, have patience with that one, and encourage another with compliments because the entities respond differently. I pay attention in my fully subjective autonomy, and I objectify in the forthcoming time. I can SEE [KNOW] if I practice this. Interacting with reflective dialogue only complicates what should be simple, as I already know HOW and WHY to act. Do I really need to entertain the others' emanations through linguistics? If I ask, I am partially enslaved to another's script in the play. When focused on the HOW and WHY of my being, I readily CHOOSE to command the outcomes based on SEEING [KNOWING] what is what.
watergaze will kindly sharpen this aspect of potential manifestation. She will show me that fluidity is NOT divergent from the objective moving into corporeal.. AND THIS while I retain the entirety of my own subjectivity, else there be no integrity. In return, I will show her that sorcerers as myself can MANIFEST hugely (and kindly).
I AM authentic as there ever will be. I AM passionate and empathetic too. I AM GOOD!
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
watergaze, to make certain you know this, I AM asking you - NOT commanding. So it is clear, I reiterate that I AM calling for my own deference to you in any way you should determine appropriate. This deference is real and spiritually charged. I will give you my best attention. I will consider greatly your opinions on how I manifest the knowledge gained.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
i am a great believer in "future retrospective"a force that was present in vincent van goghs life
that knew his work would become facsimiled millions of times.
I know that the internet is realisticly about 20 years old
as a global influence represented by new illuminations of the
habitual assemblage point.
I feel that the "future retrospective" force will start to oneday mine the internet
... it will be a web archeological dig that can only uncover as far as 1995 before
it ceases to exist.. (the fibre illuminated by the habitual assemblage point)
as a recapitulation tool= the point in the habitual assemblage points illuminations
that traverses the birth of the www is great.
but what too of the web archeologists who track this pool...
do they mould us or sculpt us, or do we sculpt them?
i.e. What of tody still develops the intent of the once living vangogh? and what of today
is influenced by van goghs works?
The SPEAR OF DESTINY" is such a powerful awakening tool
that it will literally end peoples tonals and confront them with
global change.It will even in that moment of first contact offer them the chance
of total absolution if they step into a new world.
-or to die.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
i am a great believer in "future retrospective"a force that was present in vincent van goghs life
that knew his work would become facsimiled millions of times.
I know that the internet is realisticly about 20 years old
as a global influence represented by new illuminations of the
habitual assemblage point.
I feel that the "future retrospective" force will start to oneday mine the internet
... it will be a web archeological dig that can only uncover as far as 1995 before
it ceases to exist.. (the fibre illuminated by the habitual assemblage point)
as a recapitulation tool= the point in the habitual assemblage points illuminations
that traverses the birth of the www is great.
but what too of the web archeologists who track this pool...
do they mould us or sculpt us, or do we sculpt them?
i.e. What of tody still develops the intent of the once living vangogh? and what of today
is influenced by van goghs works?
The SPEAR OF DESTINY" is such a powerful awakening tool
that it will literally end peoples tonals and confront them with
global change.It will even in that moment of first contact offer them the chance
of total absolution if they step into a new world.
-or to die.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
i am a great believer in "future retrospective"a force that was present in vincent van goghs life
that knew his work would become facsimiled millions of times.
I know that the internet is realisticly about 20 years old
as a global influence represented by new illuminations of the
habitual assemblage point.
I feel that the "future retrospective" force will start to oneday mine the internet
... it will be a web archeological dig that can only uncover as far as 1995 before
it ceases to exist.. (the fibre illuminated by the habitual assemblage point)
as a recapitulation tool= the point in the habitual assemblage points illuminations
that traverses the birth of the www is great.
but what too of the web archeologists who track this pool...
do they mould us or sculpt us, or do we sculpt them?
i.e. What of tody still develops the intent of the once living vangogh? and what of today
is influenced by van goghs works?
The SPEAR OF DESTINY" is such a powerful awakening tool
that it will literally end peoples tonals and confront them with
global change.It will even in that moment of first contact offer them the chance
of total absolution if they step into a new world.
-or to die.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
i am a great believer in "future retrospective"a force that was present in vincent van goghs life
that knew his work would become facsimiled millions of times.
I know that the internet is realisticly about 20 years old
as a global influence represented by new illuminations of the
habitual assemblage point.
I feel that the "future retrospective" force will start to oneday mine the internet
... it will be a web archeological dig that can only uncover as far as 1995 before
it ceases to exist.. (the fibre illuminated by the habitual assemblage point)
as a recapitulation tool= the point in the habitual assemblage points illuminations
that traverses the birth of the www is great.
but what too of the web archeologists who track this pool...
do they mould us or sculpt us, or do we sculpt them?
i.e. What of tody still develops the intent of the once living vangogh? and what of today
is influenced by van goghs works?
The SPEAR OF DESTINY" is such a powerful awakening tool
that it will literally end peoples tonals and confront them with
global change.It will even in that moment of first contact offer them the chance
of total absolution if they step into a new world.
-or to die.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
"The SPEAR OF DESTINY" is such a powerful awakening tool"
This sounds important. I still don't know what you mean by the spear of destiny...as well as most of your metaphors and diagrams. But maybe, like Jesus' parables, they're only meant for those in a position to understand...."ears to hear" as it's been said.
Anyways, you mentioned that a thorough recapitulation creates a charge which impacts those around whom come into contact with that charge. And, unlike the fact that photographic memory doesn't rub off on those around the one gifted with it, the charge might rub off on those in proximity. Have you seen this? I wonder if this is the "critical mass" DJ and CC were talking about regarding if enough people cultivate this charge born of complete recapitulation. Critical mass which might result in sweeping change to shift the whole of humanity.
First contact?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
"The SPEAR OF DESTINY" is such a powerful awakening tool"
This sounds important. I still don't know what you mean by the spear of destiny...as well as most of your metaphors and diagrams. But maybe, like Jesus' parables, they're only meant for those in a position to understand...."ears to hear" as it's been said.
Anyways, you mentioned that a thorough recapitulation creates a charge which impacts those around whom come into contact with that charge. And, unlike the fact that photographic memory doesn't rub off on those around the one gifted with it, the charge might rub off on those in proximity. Have you seen this? I wonder if this is the "critical mass" DJ and CC were talking about regarding if enough people cultivate this charge born of complete recapitulation. Critical mass which might result in sweeping change to shift the whole of humanity.
First contact?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
"The SPEAR OF DESTINY" is such a powerful awakening tool"
This sounds important. I still don't know what you mean by the spear of destiny...as well as most of your metaphors and diagrams. But maybe, like Jesus' parables, they're only meant for those in a position to understand...."ears to hear" as it's been said.
Anyways, you mentioned that a thorough recapitulation creates a charge which impacts those around whom come into contact with that charge. And, unlike the fact that photographic memory doesn't rub off on those around the one gifted with it, the charge might rub off on those in proximity. Have you seen this? I wonder if this is the "critical mass" DJ and CC were talking about regarding if enough people cultivate this charge born of complete recapitulation. Critical mass which might result in sweeping change to shift the whole of humanity.
First contact?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
"The SPEAR OF DESTINY" is such a powerful awakening tool"
This sounds important. I still don't know what you mean by the spear of destiny...as well as most of your metaphors and diagrams. But maybe, like Jesus' parables, they're only meant for those in a position to understand...."ears to hear" as it's been said.
Anyways, you mentioned that a thorough recapitulation creates a charge which impacts those around whom come into contact with that charge. And, unlike the fact that photographic memory doesn't rub off on those around the one gifted with it, the charge might rub off on those in proximity. Have you seen this? I wonder if this is the "critical mass" DJ and CC were talking about regarding if enough people cultivate this charge born of complete recapitulation. Critical mass which might result in sweeping change to shift the whole of humanity.
First contact?
|
