The primary purpose of stalking (for warriors)

[alien]

ninth octave wrote:
Well I see what you mean.
 In this forum a person's syntax is their signature identity.
  Exactly.  And when the syntax is *seen* to be false, we know we are dealing with a false identity and the old games are once again afoot.   For those who choose to engage, fair warning has been given.  *shrugs*  Beyond that... nmp.

[alien]

Gonzo wrote:
I'm of the opinion, if a forum can be "destroyed", it wasn't worth much to begin with.Maybe.  But another opinion is that the forums which are being targeted are the ones with active members and intelligent posts.  Agent Smith cannot afford to allow others to think outside the box.  The Matrix must be maintained, status quo protected.  This person pretends to be "stalking others" for their own good (and other tired cliches) but the reality is that she is here to play the game of Who's The Better Warrior.  She was seen through years ago and has been seen through yet again. 
Of course... if you need help locating your awareness, try a proctologist.  Probably a lot more accurate than "Sedna", and a lot less painful in the end (yes, pun intended).
"Sorry sorry, love me, love me."  (Now where have we heard that before.)

[Guest]

alien wrote:
Gonzo wrote:

I'm of the opinion, if a forum can be "destroyed", it wasn't worth much to begin with.Maybe.  But another opinion is that the forums which are being targeted are the ones with active members and intelligent posts.  Agent Smith cannot afford to allow others to think outside the box.  The Matrix must be maintained, status quo protected.  This person pretends to be "stalking others" for their own good (and other tired cliches) but the reality is that she is here to play the game of Who's The Better Warrior.  She was seen through years ago and has been seen through yet again. 
Of course... if you need help locating your awareness, try a proctologist.  Probably a lot more accurate than "Sedna", and a lot less painful in the end (yes, pun intended).
"Sorry sorry, love me, love me."  (Now where have we heard that before.)

LOL

[Nu Lang]

Gonzo wrote:I don't believe there is any need to feel responsible for others here who have not had the experience of dealing with this person, whoever she is. Everyone pays their money and takes their chances. Both Lex and Nu Lang have stated they prefer to engage. They have been warned, and they choose still to engage. I fail to see any reasonable reason in discouraging further discourse.Actually I've already engaged with Sedna. If you read the beginning of these threads you will recall we had quite an extensive interaction which I thoroughly enjoyed...not at first...but later. Now if she engages me, I will laugh and laugh... Tractors tipping over. If she hits a nerve, laugh it off...like runners do.

[Sedna]

alien wrote:
Gonzo wrote:

I'm of the opinion, if a forum can be "destroyed", it wasn't worth much to begin with.Maybe.  But another opinion is that the forums which are being targeted are the ones with active members and intelligent posts. 
This is where I would disagree, there has been no direct or intelligent answer to my question on stalking.  No one here seems to agree or to know what they are doing, furthermore, the members act like they are some great something yet have little direct knowledge.  What was targeted was a concrete answer to what stalking others is...the question remains unanswered.  In conclusion, I have concluded, that it is hogwash and a fantasy game players here play to delude themselves to thinking that they are all that.  You, Alien, are a piece of crazy bread that's all I have to say...I can't believe I bought your book.

[Gonzo]

@Sedna



In my opinion several examples of stalking were provided. Perhaps you could provide, yourself, an example of stalking that would fit your definition.

[alien]

Sedna wrote:
alien wrote:

Gonzo wrote:

I'm of the opinion, if a forum can be "destroyed", it wasn't worth much to begin with.Maybe.  But another opinion is that the forums which are being targeted are the ones with active members and intelligent posts. 
This is where I would disagree, there has been no direct or intelligent answer to my question on stalking.  No one here seems to agree or to know what they are doing, furthermore, the members act like they are some great something yet have little direct knowledge.  What was targeted was a concrete answer to what stalking others is...the question remains unanswered.  In conclusion, I have concluded, that it is hogwash and a fantasy game players here play to delude themselves to thinking that they are all that.  You, Alien, are a piece of crazy bread that's all I have to say...I can't believe I bought your book. 
  Ah, Sheila, you really need to take a long, hard look at yourself in the mirror and get over this notion that you are some kind of teacher in possession of great knowledge - a knowledge which you claim eludes all others, yet yourself remain unable to demonstrate except through your lack of it.  Crazy bread?  M'dear, YOU are the one with 3500 alternyms and a clear-cut case of multiple personality disorder running rampant through cyberspace, so if that ain't the potty calling the kettle metal, I don't know what is.  You're a hoot and a holler and the best thing you could do would be to get yerself to a nunnery!
Funny you should mention my book.  At least I've written a book.  LOL.  Have you?  If so, under what name?  I'd be curious to read YOUR analysis/assimilation of your experiences in the Toltec traditions, but of course... that would mean actually do-ing something and not just creeping around the internet pretending to be John Spirit Warrior, "Poor Dead Matt" and a host of others.  You came onto my Delphi forum years ago, wrote me privately, and claimed there were "vile stalkers" about - but when I asked you to name them, you pointed the finger at 2 people I knew personally (long-time friends), and the reality was that YOU were the only stalker on board, and you came there for the sole purpose of disrupting, just as you are doing now.  Saw through you then, saw through you again now.  Your act needs some polish and you REALLY should consider getting back on your meds so you can spew your "sustainable love" BS to the other bliss ninnies instead of trying to pass your Don Juannabe song and dance routine off on people who know you for what you are and *see* you for the damaged goods you have always been.
So, Sheila... why are you really here?  Game's over.  Cards are on the table.  Your cover is blown, so I won't ask WHO you are.  But I will ask why you are really here.  The **** you're peddling about "innocently" asking about stalking is every bit as transparent as the **** you tried to pull on my forum years ago when you were asking how you could "steal energy" from others.  *gotta laugh*  How's that workin' fer ya?
Sorry sorry, love me, love me.

[Guest]

Sedna wrote:
alien wrote:

Gonzo wrote:

I'm of the opinion, if a forum can be "destroyed", it wasn't worth much to begin with.Maybe.  But another opinion is that the forums which are being targeted are the ones with active members and intelligent posts. 
This is where I would disagree, there has been no direct or intelligent answer to my question on stalking.
Yes there has been given to you several good examples of stalking. You just keep saying this because you're trolling and seeking a reaction. You will not get one.
  No one here seems to agree or to know what they are doing,
Your statement of this is only to belittle the members. It is not true.
furthermore, the members act like they are some great something yet have little direct knowledge. 
Just trying to get a reaction. You know members here have knowledge. You envy their knowledge which is why you keep saying this.
What was targeted was a concrete answer to what stalking others is..
You've got your answers, plenty of concrete ones. You were asked by Gonzo to give a stalking example yourself. It's your turn. What is an example of stalking?
.the question remains unanswered. 
It has been answered. Several times. Now it's your turn expert. What is an example of stalking, to you?
In conclusion, I have concluded, that it is hogwash and a fantasy game players here play to delude themselves to thinking that they are all that.  You, Alien, are a piece of crazy bread that's all I have to say...I can't believe I bought your book.  
I can't believe you came back and are still trying to pretend you're someone else forest. So, what is an example of stalking, to you?

[Guest]

And this is where the plot thickens. Sedna will not reply with an example of stalking because she only knows one method. And that's internet stalking.

[alien]

datura8 wrote:

And this is where the plot thickens. Sedna will not reply with an example of stalking because she only knows one method. And that's internet stalking.

Exactly - and that's been my point from the start.  ANY Don Juanita can hide behind an avatar and an alternym and pretend to be anything they want.  In the past, Gonzo used to argue that FW's stunt was comparable to that of Julian and the Tulios - but the flaw in THAT logic is that 1) the stunt would NOT have worked had it been enacted in the real world, the flesh-and-blood reality that is NOT cyberspace; and 2) some of us DID see through the charade from the very beginnings, and IF this person were truly a stalker of the CC variety, NO ONE would have seen it coming. 
As I said to Gonzo back then, and repeat again now for those who were not present in the past adventures, stalking is actually an activity requiring thought, planning and skill.  Those who are mentally deranged (no offense intended to Sheila - honest) simply cannot help themselves, and so their actions are not planned and calculating, but clumsy and rooted in indulgence, addictions and ego.  Put simply:  FW/Sedna is no more a "stalker" than Chuck Manson was a "prophet".  She is simply compelled to engage in these behaviours, not for any noble purpose, but merely to satisfy the compulsion itself.
You can dress it up, but it's still a sheep in wolf's clothing.

[ninth octave]

alien wrote:

Sedna wrote:

alien wrote:

Maybe.  But another opinion is that the forums which are being targeted are the ones with active members and intelligent posts. 
This is where I would disagree, there has been no direct or intelligent answer to my question on stalking.  No one here seems to agree or to know what they are doing, furthermore, the members act like they are some great something yet have little direct knowledge.  What was targeted was a concrete answer to what stalking others is...the question remains unanswered.  In conclusion, I have concluded, that it is hogwash and a fantasy game players here play to delude themselves to thinking that they are all that.  You, Alien, are a piece of crazy bread that's all I have to say...I can't believe I bought your book. 
  Ah, Sheila, you really need to take a long, hard look at yourself in the mirror and get over this notion that you are some kind of teacher in possession of great knowledge - a knowledge which you claim eludes all others, yet yourself remain unable to demonstrate except through your lack of it.  Crazy bread?  M'dear, YOU are the one with 3500 alternyms and a clear-cut case of multiple personality disorder running rampant through cyberspace, so if that ain't the potty calling the kettle metal, I don't know what is.  You're a hoot and a holler and the best thing you could do would be to get yerself to a nunnery!
Funny you should mention my book.  At least I've written a book.  LOL.  Have you?  If so, under what name?  I'd be curious to read YOUR analysis/assimilation of your experiences in the Toltec traditions, but of course... that would mean actually do-ing something and not just creeping around the internet pretending to be John Spirit Warrior, "Poor Dead Matt" and a host of others.  You came onto my Delphi forum years ago, wrote me privately, and claimed there were "vile stalkers" about - but when I asked you to name them, you pointed the finger at 2 people I knew personally (long-time friends), and the reality was that YOU were the only stalker on board, and you came there for the sole purpose of disrupting, just as you are doing now.  Saw through you then, saw through you again now.  Your act needs some polish and you REALLY should consider getting back on your meds so you can spew your "sustainable love" BS to the other bliss ninnies instead of trying to pass your Don Juannabe song and dance routine off on people who know you for what you are and *see* you for the damaged goods you have always been.
So, Sheila... why are you really here?  Game's over.  Cards are on the table.  Your cover is blown, so I won't ask WHO you are.  But I will ask why you are really here.  The **** you're peddling about "innocently" asking about stalking is every bit as transparent as the **** you tried to pull on my forum years ago when you were asking how you could "steal energy" from others.  *gotta laugh*  How's that workin' fer ya?
Sorry sorry, love me, love me.

  
  LOL!!  Alien, very humorous

[Guest]

..... Ten years later.....

[Gonzo]

Time flies when you're having fun.

[Guest]

So the call is on to curb the toxicity on these threads. Already forest, like in past, you are making people sick. I am flabbergasted by all this. Two long threads with you getting the attention. (How's that working for you)? How long will you last?
I'm not going to allow history to repeat itself, so here's what I'm going to do. I am going to allow for you to answer my post, and only my post, because you're not going to avoid it.
So you will answer my post: to provide an example of stalking. And if you do not, and you just ramble on with Gonzo playing games, talking about awareness, your new topic, I will delete every post you make.
You WILL address my question and provide an example, and if you will not then you will lose your voice. I will not allow you to turn this place into a kitty box with your sludge. So think carefully as you're about to post.
And if you don't like it leave, and don't let the door hit you on the ass on your way out....

[Guest]

And Sedna, make no mistake,  I am stalking you.  This is what I'm doing. Here's your example. I am putting on the squeeze, so you can come out, and either be authentic, or run for the hills.
You're such an expert on cc, you should be able to provide to me a clear, concise, neat, example of stalking. The tables are turned, ball is in your court. It is due time.  I want my example.  And if I do not get it, *poof* you disappear, and I will enjoy, demolishing your posts, from here on out.

[seesaw]

Well IMO 'stalking the self' is literally a case of denconstructing the routines that make us who we normally are. That is a simple way of describing it. Lets start with that. Just mapping out the **** that makes me me and then chucking a spanner or two in the mix just for the hell of it. It sound simple doesn't it?  It is, even though i currently struggle with this insanely simple idea.
Later on when we start to gather power with this we can move these simple disruptions of routines into genuine 'not doings'.
For me a genuine not doing is practicing a disrupted routine that has been singled out by 'power'. I'll give an example.
I once went to a weekend tensegrity seminar, took part and went home. When at home i went upstairs to read a book as per normal, (some non dual **** i was into at the time) To my surprise i found i was more comfortable reading the book when the page was reversed. I actually felt the need to read the book using a mirror.It just felt much more comfortable this way.It was a complete surprise.  This was not pre concieved, planned ,or anything. It just happened.
I think stalking ourself and power go hand in hand. One will lead simply to the next on its own. Following such things is merely hunting abstract events, AKA 'stalking'.
This is where i am right now with the word. That i can describe with any lucidity anyway.

[Littlepaw]

i just want to add that what also kills a warriors quest is ignoring knowledge. I and everybody else constantly has little knowings about about life, little certaintys which like synchrnisitys are also very easy to wrtie off as nothing.

[Guest]